Comparative Study of the Biomechanics of Materials Used in Stenting

Article Preview

Abstract:

This paper presents a comparative bibliographic study of different materials with elevated biomechanical biocompatibility regarding the stent-blood vessel interaction. Only the materials used in coronary stents’ manufacturing are considered: stainless-steel (316L), Cobalt-Chromium alloys (CoCrMo, CoNiCrMo), Nickel-Titanium alloys (Nitinol), Tantalum. The main characteristics that result from the stress-strain curve of each material are presented, as well as the biocompatibility and durability. The stainless-steel has good mechanical properties, excellent biocompatibility and low price. Cobalt-Chromium alloys have excellent mechanical properties, excellent biocompatibility, acceptable shape memory properties, but high density and low flexibility. The Nitinol represents the best choice, with excellent mechanical properties, excellent biocompatibility, good corrosion resistance, high flexibility (super-elastic behavior), low density, but high price. Tantalum alloys present the best biocompatibility and high flexibility, but the mechanical properties are relative modest.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Solid State Phenomena (Volume 188)

Pages:

76-81

Citation:

Online since:

May 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] F. Migliavacca, L. Petrini, P. Massarotti, S. Schievano, F. Auricchio, G. Dubini: Stainless and shape memory alloy coronary stents, a computational study on the interaction with the vascular wall, Biomechan Model Mechanobiol 2 (2004), p.205–217

DOI: 10.1007/s10237-004-0039-6

Google Scholar

[2] Information on http://tipspedia.ro

Google Scholar

[3] Information on http://www.mdd.ro

Google Scholar

[4] Issel Anne, L. Lim: Biocompatibility of Stent Materials, Volume 11 (2004)

Google Scholar

[5] Dan Batalu: Biocompatible materials used for implants. Implant design (2007)

Google Scholar

[6] L.A. Alicea, J.I. Aviles et al: Mechanics Biomaterials: Stent, Application of Engineering Mechanics in Medicine, GED – University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez, (2004)

Google Scholar

[7] C. Craciunescu, I. Mihalea: Advanced Materials and Structures, Politehnica (1999)

Google Scholar

[8] G. Mani, M. D. Feldman, D. Patel, C. Mauli Agrawal: Coronary stents: A materials perspective, Biomaterials, Volume 28 (2007), pp.1689-1710

DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.11.042

Google Scholar

[9] R. Erbel, A. Fischer: Flexible support - Metallic biomaterials for coronary stents, Essener Unikate 13 (2000)

Google Scholar

[10] Information on http://www.mediligence.com

Google Scholar

[11] Information on http://medicaldesign.com

Google Scholar

[12] A.Scherssler, A.Melzer: Nitinol-Smart Materials for vascular Interventions, Trade Magazine, Medizintechnik in Bayern (2002)

Google Scholar

[13] A.R. Pelton, D. Stöckel, T.W. Duerig: Medical uses of nitinol, Materials Science Forum, Vols. 327-328 (2000), pp.63-70

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/msf.327-328.63

Google Scholar

[14] P. Poncin, C. Millet, J. Chevy, J. L. Proft: Comparing and Optimizing Co-Cr Tubing for Stent Applications, Proceedings of the International Conference on Material and Processes for Medical Devices, ASM International (2004)

Google Scholar

[15] Information on http://revista-urologia.ro

Google Scholar