Implant Surface Finishing Influence on Tissue-Implant Anchoring

Abstract:

The implant surface morphology and microstructure significantly affect cells and tissue quantity formed at the interface. Therefore, the biocompatibility of an implant is just one of many parameters that influence tissue response to metallic implants. In order to understand the importance of the surface morphology and microscopic structures, we must retain first the main problem that limit the application and operation of metal implants - the lack of implant viable anchoring within the tissue. On this basis, experimental studies were carried out on implants having different microstructures and macrostructures that have been used in order to achieve a better long-term anchoring and stability of the implant support.

• Periodical: Solid State Phenomena (Volume 216)
• Pages: 39-44
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/SSP.216.39
• Online since: August 2014
• Authors: Florin Miculescu, Lucian Toma Ciocan, Marian Miculescu*, Daniela Meghea, Marin Bane, Mihai Branzei
• Keywords: Metallic Implant, Surface Finishing, Tissue Anchoring

References

[1] C.N. Elias, Y. Oshidab, J. H. Cavalcanti Lima, C. A. Mullere, Relationship between surface properties (roughness, wettability and morphology) of titanium and dental implant removal torque, J Mech. Behr Biomed Mat, 1 (3) (2008) 234–242.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2007.12.002

[2] S.I. Voicu, A.C. Nechifor, B. Serban, G. Nechifor, M. Miculescu, Formylated Polysulphone Membranes for Cell Immobilization, J Optoelectron Adv M 9 (2007) 3423-3426.

[3] S. Bauer, P. Schmuki, K. von der Mark, J. Park, Progress in Materials Science, Engineering biocompatible implant surfaces: Part I: Materials and surfaces, 58 (3) (2013) 261–326.

DOI: 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2012.09.001

[4] O. Vasile, F. Miculescu, S.I. Voicu, Correlation aspects between morphology, infrared and acoustic absorptions properties of various material, Optoelectron Adv Mat 6 (5-6) (2012) 631-638.

[5] S.I. Voicu, A. Dobrica, S. Sava, A. Ivan, L. Naftanaila, Cationic surfactants-controlled geometry and domensions of polymeric membrane pores, J Optoelectron Adv M 14 (11-12) (2012) 923-928.

[6] J.E. Davies, E Ajami, R Moineddin, V.C. Mendesa, The roles of different scale ranges of surface implant topography on the stability of the bone/implant interface, Biomaterials, 34 (14) (2013) 3535–3546.

DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.01.024

[7] G. Nechifor, S.I. Voicu, A.C. Nechifor, S. Garea, Nanostructure hybrid membrane polysulfone-carbon nanotubes for hemodyalisis, Desalination 241 (2009) 342-348.

DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2007.11.089

[8] D.M. Brunette, B. Chehroudi, The Effects Of The Surface Topography Of Micromachined Titanium Substrata On Cell Behavior In Vitro And In Vivo, J. Biom. Eng., 121 (1999) 49 –57.

DOI: 10.1115/1.2798042

[9] G. E. Stan, A. C. Popa, A. C. Galca, et al, Strong bonding between sputtered bioglass-ceramic films and Ti-substrate implants induced by atomic inter-diffusion post-deposition heat-treatments, Appl. Surf. Sci., 280 (2013) 530-538.

DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2013.05.022

[10] G. Luo, A.M. Sadegh, H. Alexander, W. Jaffe, D. Scott, S.C. Cowin, The effect of surface roughness on the stress adaptation of trabecular architecture around a cylindrical implant, J Biomechanics, 32 (3) (1999) 275–284.

DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9290(98)00172-9

[11] G. E. Stan, I. Pasuk, M.A. Husanu, et al, Highly adherent bioactive glass thin films synthetized by magnetron sputtering at low temperature, J Mater Sci-Mater M 22 (12) (2012) 2693-2710.

DOI: 10.1007/s10856-011-4441-1

[12] G. Mendonçaa, D.B.S. Mendonçaa, F.J.L. Aragãoa, L.F. Cooper, Advancing dental implant surface technology – From micron- to nanotopography, Biomaterials, 29 (28) (2008) 3822–3835.

DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.05.012

[13] F Grizon, E Aguado, G Huré, M. F Baslé, D Chappard, Enhanced bone integration of implants with increased surface roughness: a long term study in the sheep, J Dentistry, 30 (5–6) (2002) 195–203.

DOI: 10.1016/s0300-5712(02)00018-0

[14] G. E. Stan, S. Pina, D.U. Tulyaganov, et al, Biomineralization capability of adherent bio-glass films prepared by magnetron sputtering, J Mater Sci-Mater M 21 (10) (2010) 2899-2899.

DOI: 10.1007/s10856-010-4040-6

[15] De Lange G. De Putter C., Structure Of The Bone Interface To Dental Implants In Vivo, J Oral Implant, 19 (1993) 123-35.