Strength Analysis of Shipping Container Floor with Gooseneck Tunnel under Heavy Cargo Load

Arkadiusz Rzeczycki; Bogusz Wiśnicki

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/SSP.252.81

Paper Titles

The Identification of Selected Issues of Port Facilities Wear in Dusty Environments of Bulk Cargoes
p.31

Selected Issues of Corrosive - Mechanical Wear in the Port Grain Elevator
p.41

Cavitation Wear of CuZn10 Alloy in As-Cast State and after Plastic Working and Annealing
p.51

The Evaluation of the Cavitational Damage in MgAl2Si Alloy Using Various Laboratory Stands
p.61

The Method for Quantitative Determination of Wear and Tear of Machines’ Elements in Diagnostic Tests
p.71

Strength Analysis of Shipping Container Floor with Gooseneck Tunnel under Heavy Cargo Load
p.81

Issues of Container Handling Modeling in the Aspect of Generating the Corrosion and Mechanical Wear
p.91

The Identification of Wear Processes in Production and Transport of Concrete Mixtures
p.101

The Influence of Liquid Refrigerant on Refrigerating Compressors Sliding Surfaces
p.111

HomeSolid State PhenomenaSolid State Phenomena Vol. 252Strength Analysis of Shipping Container Floor with...

Strength Analysis of Shipping Container Floor with Gooseneck Tunnel under Heavy Cargo Load

Abstract:

Currently, guidelines for safely loading shipping containers with heavy cargo in the gooseneck tunnel region do not exist. This work investigates the influence of the construction type of the gooseneck tunnel on the strength of the floor of the shipping container. The main objective is to develop guidelines for loading shipping containers with heavy cargo in the gooseneck tunnel region. This paper investigates strength of the floor using finite element method. The finite element analysis shows how the container's floor responds in the given loading scenarios.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Wear Processes in the Transport Engineering

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Solid State Phenomena (Volume 252)

Pages:

81-90

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/SSP.252.81

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

July 2016

Authors:

Arkadiusz Rzeczycki*, Bogusz Wiśnicki

Keywords:

Finite Element Method, Gooseneck Tunnel, Heavy Cargo, Shipping Container, Strength Analysis

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

References

[1] H. K. Kap, G. Hans-Otto, Container Terminals and Cargo Systems. Design, Operations Management and Logistics Control Issues, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, (2007).

Google Scholar

[2] A. Imai, Multi-objective simultaneous stowage and load planning for a container ship with container rehandle in yard stacks, European Journal of Operational Research Vol. 171, No. 2 (2006) 373–389.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2004.07.066

Google Scholar

[3] P. Corry, E. Kozan, Decision support system for intermodal train planning, Proceedings of the second international Intelligent Logistics Systems Conference Australian Society for Operations Research, Queensland Branch, (2006).

Google Scholar

[4] J. Flodén, Modelling Intermodal Freight Transport - The Potential of Combined Transport in Sweden, Göteborg University, Publishing, Göteborg (2007).

Google Scholar

[5] Polski Rejestr Statków, Rules for the Construction of Containers, Gdańsk, (2014).

Google Scholar

[6] Singamas Container Holdings Limited, Kukdong MES CO., LTD, information on http: /www. singamas. com.

Google Scholar

[7] K. Giriunas, H. Sezen, R.B. Dupaix, Evaluation, modeling, and analysis of shipping container building structures, Eng. Structures 43, (2012) 48-57.

DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.05.001

Google Scholar

[8] O.I. Balyts'kyi, J. Chmiel, Resistance of plate shipbuilding steels to cavitation-erosion and fatigue fracture, Materials Science, Vol. 50, No. 5 (2015) 736-739.

DOI: 10.1007/s11003-015-9779-y

Google Scholar

[9] O.I. Balyts'kyi, J. Chmiel, J. Trojanowski, Degradation of steels in the hulls of river ships, Materials Science, Vol. 43, No. 3 (2007) 434-438.

DOI: 10.1007/s11003-007-0050-z

Google Scholar