The Kinetics of Melting: Liquid Fraction versus Time

Abstract:

The fraction liquid present during semi-solid processing has a critical effect. Conventionally the process window has been defined by inspecting the liquid fraction versus temperature curve (derived from thermodynamic prediction using a thermodynamic prediction software package for example, or derived from differential scanning calorimetry results). It has been assumed that a freezing range with temperature is required for semi-solid processing to be possible. However, recently a South African group (Curle, Moller and Wilkins) has shown that it is possible to rheo-process both high-purity aluminium and a binary Al-Si eutectic alloy i.e. materials with no freezing range. This behaviour highlights the fact that it takes time for liquid to form i.e. the kinetics of melting are important. Here the liquid fraction vs time for high purity aluminium is derived from experimental results to identify the process window in terms of time rather than temperature. The time sensitivity in thixoforming or rheocasting depends on the sample mass, the heat flux and the phase transformation temperature. It is also important in determining the vulnerability to defects such as hot tears, which tend to occur particularly with the alloys which are conventionally wrought rather than cast such as the 2000 series aluminium alloys.

• Periodical: Solid State Phenomena (Volume 256)
• Pages: 94-99
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/SSP.256.94
• Online since: September 2016
• Authors: Du Yao Zhang, H.V. Atkinson*, H.B. Dong
• Keywords: Aluminium, Kinetics, Liquid Fraction, Melting, Semisolid Processing

References

[1] D. Zhang, H. Dong, H.V. Atkinson, What is the Process Window for Semi-solid Processing?, Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A, 47. 1 (2016) 1-5.

[2] H.V. Atkinson, P. Kapranos, D.H. Kirkwood, Alloy development for thixoforming, in: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference Semi-solid Processing of Alloys and Composites, Turin, Italy; Sep 27-29, Brescia, Italy: Edimet-Spa; 2000, pp.443-450.

[3] A.A. Kazakov, Alloy compositions for semisolid forming, Advanced Materials & Processes, 157 (2000) 31-34.

[4] D. Liu, H.V. Atkinson, H. Jones, Thermodynamic prediction of thixoformability in alloys based on the Al–Si–Cu and Al–Si–Cu–Mg systems, Acta Materialia, 53 (2005) 3807-3819.

DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2005.04.028

[5] D. Zhang, H.V. Atkinson, H Dong, Q. Zhu, Comparison between prediction of liquid fraction versus temperature and experimental results from DSC and SPSC, Solid State Phenomena, 217-218 (2015) 442-449.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/ssp.217-218.442

[6] U. Curle, H. Möller, J. Wilkins, Shape rheocasting of high purity aluminium, Scripta Materialia, 64 (2011) 479-482.

DOI: 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2010.11.010

[7] U. Curle, H. Möller, J. Wilkins, Shape rheocasting of unmodified Al–Si binary eutectic, Materials Letters, 65 (2011) 1469-1472.

DOI: 10.1016/j.matlet.2011.02.040

[8] D. Larouche, C. Laroche, M. Bouchard, Analysis of differential scanning calorimetric measurements performed on a binary aluminium alloy, Acta Materialia, 51 (2003) 2161-2170.

DOI: 10.1016/s1359-6454(03)00003-x

[9] H. Dong, J.D. Hunt, A novel single-pan scanning calorimeter: measurement of thermophysical properties of metallic alloys, Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, 64 (2001) 341-350.

[10] H. Dong, R. Brooks, Determination of liquidus temperature in Al–Si and Al–Si–Mg alloys using a single-pan scanning calorimeter, Materials Science and Engineering A 413 (2005) 480-484.

DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2005.09.016

[11] H. Dong, M. Shin, E. Kurum, H. Cama, J. Hunt, Determination of liquid fraction during solidification of aluminium alloys using a single-pan scanning calorimeter, Fluid phase equilibria, 212 (2003) 199-208.

DOI: 10.1016/s0378-3812(03)00257-7

[12] G. Höhne, W.F. Hemminger, H.J. Flammersheim: Differential Scanning Calorimetry, 2nd edition, Springer, (2003).

[13] H.V. Atkinson: Current Status of Semi-Solid Processing of Metallic Materials, in: Advances in Material Forming, Springer Paris, (2007) 81-98.

DOI: 10.1007/978-2-287-72143-4_6