Behavior of Lode Dependent Plasticity at Plane Strain Condition and its Implication to Ductile Fracture

Abstract:

Variety of metals are complex materials exhibiting various behavior under different loading. Many metallic materials exhibit Tresca-like behavior rather than von Mises. It means different behavior in tension under plane strain and uniaxial stress conditions. This might be described by Lode dependent plasticity which should result in better prediction in force or torque responses of material tests. Good agreement between computation and experiment is also very important when calibrating the ductile fracture criteria. Several tests under plane strain and uniaxial stress states were carried out on aluminum alloy 2024-T351 where the Lode dependency was significant. The Lode dependent plasticity was implemented along with von Mises and Tresca-like yield criteria, which resulted in improvement of force–displacement responses of plane strain tests simulations. But it also caused significant change in the stress state of tensile flat and grooved plates which wrongly approached uniaxial tension condition. This inconvenience prevents plane strain experiments from using for calibration of ductile fracture criteria under these circumstances.

• Periodical: Solid State Phenomena (Volume 258)
• Pages: 213-216
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/SSP.258.213
• Online since: December 2016
• Authors: František Šebek*, Jindrich Petruška, Petr Kubík
• Keywords: Ductile Fracture, Lode Angle, Plane Strain, Tresca-Like Behavior, Von Mises Yield Criterion

References

[1] J. Petruška, T. Návrat and F. Šebek: Adv. Mat. Res. Vol. 586 (2012), p.389–393.

[2] P. Kubík, F. Šebek, J. Petruška, J. Hůlka, J. Růžička, M. Španiel, J. Džugan and A. Prantl: Key Eng. Mater. Vols. 592–593 (2014), p.258–261.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/kem.592-593.258

[3] F. Šebek, J. Hůlka, P. Kubík and J. Petruška: Adv. Mat. Res. Vol. 980 (2014), p.189–193.

[4] H.K. Akpama, M. Ben Bettaieb and F. Abed-Meraim: Key Eng. Mater. Vols. 651–653 (2015), p.21–26.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/kem.651-653.21

[5] P.Y. Zhao, Y.B. Guo and G.K. Qu: Key Eng. Mater. Vol. 667 (2015), p.41–46.

[6] C.F. Guzmán, V. Tuninetti, G. Gilles and A.M. Habraken: Key Eng. Mater. Vols. 651–653 (2015), p.575–580.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/kem.651-653.575

[7] F. Šebek, P. Kubík and J. Petruška, in: Engineering Mechanics, edited by V. Fuis, Brno University of Technology, Brno, Czech Republic (2014).

[8] M. Kroon and J. Faleskog: Comput. Mech. Vol. 52 (2013), p.1059–1070.

[9] F. Šebek, P. Kubík and J. Petruška: MM Sci. J. (2015), p.617–621.

[10] N. Park and H. Huh: Key Eng. Mater. Vol. 626 (2015), p.347–352.

[11] M. Algarni, Y. Bai and Y. Choi: Eng. Fract. Mech. Vol. 147 (2015), p.140–157.

[12] Y. Bai and T. Wierzbicki: Int. J. Plast. Vol. 24 (2008), p.1071–1096.

[13] X. Gao, T. Zhang, J. Zhou, S.M. Graham, M. Hayden and Ch. Roe: Int. J. Plast. Vol. 27 (2011), p.217–231.