The Effect of Initial Solution pH on Surface Properties of Ferric Ion Precipitates Formed during Biooxidation of Ferrous Ion by Leptospirillum ferriphilum

Article Preview

Abstract:

While bioleaching is a proven technology for the efficient recovery of base metals from sulphide minerals, its sustenance is dependent on the continuous availability of ferric ion, Fe3+, in soluble form, in bioleach liquor. However, the solubility of ferric ion is low at higher pH thus resulting in the formation of various types of ferric ion precipitates, which decreases leaching efficiency by trapping the leached metals in solution through an adsorption. The effect of initial solution pH on the surface properties of ferric ion precipitates was investigated with a view to establish a relationship between operational pH and surface charge on precipitate and to relate this to the precipitates metal adsorption properties. Ferric ion precipitates recovered from a typical biooxidation process were characterized by XRD, SEM, PSD and zeta potential. Potassium-hydronium jarosite were the main phases identified by X-ray diffraction (XRD) analyses. The SEM results revealed that the precipitates had smooth surfaces with development of sharp edges on the precipitates formed at high pH. The precipitates formed at higher pH had less positive charge and scavenged more copper ions due to the high electrostatic attraction forces. The results from this study revealed that surface charge on a precipitate can give an indication of its metal adsorption capacity and that in order to prevent metal loss and improve extraction efficiency, solution conditions should be maintained such that the resulting precipitates have high positive surface charge to promote high electrostatic repulsion forces.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Solid State Phenomena (Volume 262)

Pages:

403-407

Citation:

Online since:

August 2017

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2017 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] M. Wanjiya, F. Chowdhury, T. V. Ojumu, Solution Ph and Jarosite Management during Ferrous Ion Biooxidation in A Novel Packed-Column Bioreactor, Adv. Mat. Res. 1130 (2015) 291 - 295.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.1130.291

Google Scholar

[2] S. I. Grishin, J. M. Bigham, O. H. Touvinen, Characterization of Jarosite Formed upon Bacterial Oxidation of Ferrous Sulfate in a Packed-Bed Reactor, Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 54 (1988) 3101 - 3106.

DOI: 10.1128/aem.54.12.3101-3106.1988

Google Scholar

[3] S. Ju, Y. Zhang, P. Xue, Y. Wang, Clean hydrometallurgical route to recover zinc, silver, lead, copper, cadmium and iron from hazardous jarosite residues produced during zinc hydrometallurgy, J. Hazard Mater. 192 (2011) 554 - 558.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.05.049

Google Scholar

[4] W. Nheta, M. E. Makhatha In Leaching of nickel from a jarosite precipitate with hydrochloric acid, 2013; International Conference on Chemical and Environmental Engineering (ICCEE'2013).

Google Scholar

[5] K. A. Hudson-Edwards, K. Wright, Computer simulations of the interactions of the (012) and (001) surfaces of jarosite with Al, Cd, Cu2+ and Zn, Geochim. Cosmochim Ac. 75 (2011) 52 - 62.

DOI: 10.1016/j.gca.2010.10.004

Google Scholar

[6] T. V. Ojumu, J. Petersen, The kinetics of ferrous ion oxidation by Leptospirillum ferriphilum in continuous culture: The effect of pH, Hydrometallurgy. 106 (2011) 5-11.

DOI: 10.1016/j.hydromet.2010.11.007

Google Scholar

[7] G. -h. Gu, K. -t. HU, L. Shuang-ke, Surface characterization of chalcopyrite interacting with Leptospirillum ferriphilum, Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China. 24 (2014) 1898 - (1904).

DOI: 10.1016/s1003-6326(14)63269-6

Google Scholar

[8] J. P. Gramp, F. S. Jones, J. M. Bigham, O. H. Tuovinen, Monovalent cation concentrations determine the types of Fe (III) hydroxysulfate precipitates formed in bioleach solutions, Hydrometallurgy. 94 (2008) 29-33.

DOI: 10.1016/j.hydromet.2008.05.019

Google Scholar

[9] J. Liu, B. Li, D. Zhong, L. Xia, G. Qiu, Preparation of jarosite by Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans oxidation, J. Cent. South Univ. Technol. 14 (2007) 623-628.

DOI: 10.1007/s11771-007-0119-8

Google Scholar

[10] J. M. Bigham, D. K. Nordstrom, Iron and aluminum hydroxysulfates from acid sulfate waters in: C.N. Alpers, J.L. Jambor, D.K. Nordstrom (Eds. ), Sulfate minerals, crystallography, geochemistry and environmental significance. Reviews in mineralogy and geochemistry, Mineralogical Society of America, Washington, D.C., 2000, p.351.

DOI: 10.1515/9781501508660-009

Google Scholar

[11] A. H. Kaksonen, C. Morris, S. Rea, J. Li, K. M. Usher, R. G. McDonald, F. Hilario, T. Hosken, M. Jackson, C. A. du Plessis, Biohydrometallurgical iron oxidation and precipitation: Part II — Jarosite precipitate characterisation and acid recovery by conversion to hematite, Hydrometallurgy. 147–148 (2014).

DOI: 10.1016/j.hydromet.2014.04.015

Google Scholar

[12] F. Chowdhury, T. V. Ojumu, Investigation of ferrous-iron biooxidation kinetics by Leptospirillum ferriphilum in a novel packed-column bioreactor: Effects of temperature and jarosite accumulation, Hydrometallurgy. 141 (2014) 36-42.

DOI: 10.1016/j.hydromet.2013.09.011

Google Scholar

[13] J. Jonsson. Phase transformations and surface chemistry of secondary iron minerals formed from acid mine drainage. PhD Thesis, Umea University, (2003).

Google Scholar