Comparative Study of Adhesive Wear for CoCr, TiC-NiMo, WC-Co as Potential FSW Tool Materials

Article Preview

Abstract:

Friction stir welding is a novel and promising joining process and most common welding tool failure is transformation of geometry caused by wear. In our point of view, this is adhesion wear. The lathe testing of adhesion wear was conducted to compare wear resistance of following materials: Co-25wt%Cr, TiC-25wt%Ni/Mo and WC-6wt%Co. According to characteristics of investigated materials, they are capable to become alternatives for conventional frictional stir welding (FSW) tool materials. Adhesive wear tests were performed by turning aluminium alloy AW6082-T6 at low speed – travel length, turning speed and feed rate were selected to simulate FSW conditions. The adhesive wear was determined as the change of the geometry of the cutting edges of the tool measured using SEM images. Most promising tool material in terms of adhesion wear resistance is WC-Co hardmetal. The two main stages of wear were distinguished: at first, the appearance of intensive adhesion wear followed by steady state wear. Surface fatigue wear complements development of the adhesive wear.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Solid State Phenomena (Volume 267)

Pages:

224-228

Citation:

Online since:

October 2017

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2017 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] P.L. Threadgill, A.J. Leonard, H.R. Shercliff, P.J. Withers, Friction stir welding of aluminium alloys, International Materials Reviews. 54 (2009) 49-93.

DOI: 10.1179/174328009x411136

Google Scholar

[2] R.S. Mishra, Z.Y. Mab, Friction stir welding and processing, Materials Science and Engineering. 50 (2005) 1-78.

Google Scholar

[3] Y.N. Zhang, X. Cao, S. Larose, P. Wanjara, Review of tools for friction stir welding and processing, Canadian Metallurgical Quarterly. 51 (2012) 250-260.

DOI: 10.1179/1879139512y.0000000015

Google Scholar

[4] H. Klaasen, J. Kubarsepp, T. Roosaar, M. Viljus, R. Traksmaa, Adhesive wear performance of hardmetals and cermets, Wear. 263 (2010) 1122-1128.

DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2010.01.006

Google Scholar

[5] I. Hussainova, J. Kübarsepp, J. Pirso, Mechanical properties and features of cermets, Wear. 250 (2001) 818-825.

DOI: 10.1016/s0043-1648(01)00737-2

Google Scholar

[6] K.J. Brookes, World Dictionary and Handbook of Hardmetals and Hard Materials. London, (1996).

Google Scholar

[7] D. Mari, Mechanical Behavior of Hardmetals at High Temperature, in: V. K. Sarin, D. Mari, L. Llanes (Eds. ), Comprehensive Hard Materials, Elsevier Ltd., Oxford, (2014).

DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-08-096527-7.00014-3

Google Scholar

[8] Y.S. Al Jabbari, Physico-mechanical properties and prost hodontic applications of Co-Cr dental alloys: a review of the literature, The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics. 6 (2014) 138-145.

DOI: 10.4047/jap.2014.6.2.138

Google Scholar

[9] A.G. Evans, E.A. Charles, Fracture toughness determinations by indentation, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 59 (1976) 371-372.

Google Scholar

[10] X. Wang, P.Y. Kwon, WC/Co tool wear in dry turning of commercially pure aluminium, Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering. 136 (2014) 1-7.

DOI: 10.1115/1.4026514

Google Scholar

[11] J. Kübarsepp, H. Klaasen, F. Sergejev, Performance of cemented carbides in cyclic loading wear conditions, Materials Science Forum. 534-536 (2007) 1221-1224.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/msf.534-536.1221

Google Scholar

[12] H. Klaasen, J. Kübarsepp, A. Tšinjan, F. Sergejev, Performance of carbide composites in cyclic loading wear conditions, Wear. 271 (2011) 837-841.

DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2011.03.005

Google Scholar

[13] F. Sergejev, I. Preis, I. Hussainova, J. Kübarsepp, Fatigue mechanics of TiC-based cemented carbides, J. Eng. Trib. 222 (2008) 201-209.

DOI: 10.1243/13506501jet342

Google Scholar