Microstructural Evolution of SKD11 Tool Steel during Multi-Stage Thixoforming and Subsequent Heat Treatments

Article Preview

Abstract:

The application of semisolid forming (SSF) is inhibited significantly by the inhomogeneous distributions of microstructure and mechanical properties in the products manufactured by SSF. Beside of forming parameters including forming temperature, isothermal holding time, and forming speed, post heat treatments of SSF is one of the most important facts affecting the microstructure and mechanical properties of the SSF-manufactured products. In this study, heat treatments including annealing, quenching, and tempering different experimental conditions were conducted on the SKD11 tool steel samples manufactured by multi-stage thixoforming with different forming parameters. The microstructures in different regions of specimen processed by different experimental conditions were investigated by using a field-emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM), an energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS), and X-ray diffractometer (XRD). Base on the results of microstructural analyses, the microstructural evolution of SKD11 tool steel during multi-stage thixoforming and subsequent heat treatments with varies experimental parameters were discussed and summarized. Meanwhile, the relationship between microstructure and mechanical properties of SKD11 tool steel processed by multi-stage thixoforming and subsequent heat treatment was also discussed.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Solid State Phenomena (Volume 285)

Pages:

45-50

Citation:

Online since:

January 2019

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2019 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] M.C. Flemings, Behavior of metal alloys in the semisolid state. Met. Trans. 22A(1991) 957-981.

Google Scholar

[2] M. Kiuchi, R. Kopp, Mushy/semi-solid metal forming technology – present and future. CIRP Ann. – Manuf. Technol. 51(2002) 653-670.

DOI: 10.1016/s0007-8506(07)61705-3

Google Scholar

[3] H.V. Atkinson, A. Rassili, Thixoforging steel. Shaker Verlag, Aachen, Germany, 2010, pp.13-18.

Google Scholar

[4] D.I. Uhlenhaut, J. Kradolfer, W. Püttgen, J.F. Löffler, P.J. Uggowitzer, Structure and properties of a hypoeutectic chromium steel processed in the semisolid state. Acta Mater. 54(2006) 2727-2734.

DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2006.02.021

Google Scholar

[5] J. Li, S. Sugiyama, J. Yanagimoto, Microstructural evolution and flow stress of semisolid type 304 stainless steel. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 161(2005) 396-406.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.07.063

Google Scholar

[6] A. Rassili, J.C. Pierret, G. Vaneetveld, P. Cezard, R. Bigot, M. Robelet, Influence of the Pre and Post Treatment Operations on the Properties of the Thixoformed Steel Parts,, Solid State Phenomena Vols. 141-143 (2008) pp.689-694.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/ssp.141-143.689

Google Scholar

[7] R. Song, Y. Kang, A. Zhao, Semi-solid rolling process of steel strips. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 198(2008) 291-299.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.06.079

Google Scholar

[8] W. Püttgen, B. Hallstedt, W. Bleck, P.J. Uggowitzer, On the microstructure formation in chromium steels rapidly cooled from the semisolid state. Acta Mater. 55(2007) 1033-1042.

DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2006.09.021

Google Scholar

[9] Y. Meng, S. Sugiyama, J. Yanagimoto, Microstructural evolution during RAP process and deformation behavior of semisolid SKD61 tool steel. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 212(2012) 1731-1741.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2012.04.003

Google Scholar

[10] Y. Meng, J. Zhang, J. Zhou, S. Sugiyama, J. Yanagimoto, Study on the effects of forming conditions on microstructural evolution and forming behaviors of Cr-V-Mo tool steel during multi-stage thixoforging by physical simulation. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 248(2017) 275–285.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2017.05.039

Google Scholar