A Modified Energy Method for Equilibrium Structure and Strain Energy of Armchair Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes

Article Preview

Abstract:

Based on molecular mechanics, a modified energy model was proposed to study the angular variation and strain energy of armchair carbon nanotubes under stress-free conditions. In this model, the inversion energy term is added to make the calculation more accurate. The results show that the strain energy of armchair carbon nanotubes is more significantly affected by the added energy term under small diameter, especially when the diameter is less than 1 nm. This has a lot to do with the curvature of the tube. As compared with the unmodified model, the strain energy deviation between the two models decreases with the increase of tube diameter, which also verifies the remarkable characteristics of small diameter. At the same time, the angles change of armchair carbon nanotubes was calculated by using the modified model in the stress-free state, which is also quite different from that of the unmodified one in the small diameter.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Solid State Phenomena (Volume 298)

Pages:

202-207

Citation:

Online since:

October 2019

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2019 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Iijima S. Helical microtubes of graphite carbon. Nature. 354 (1991) 56–58.

Google Scholar

[2] Hernandez E., Goze C., Bernier P., Rubio A. Elastic properties of C and BxCyNz composite nanotubes. Phys Rev Lett. 80 (1998) 4502–4505.

Google Scholar

[3] Sánchez-Portal, Daniel, Artacho E., Soler, José, et al. Ab initio structural, elastic, and vibrational properties of carbon nanotubes. 59(19) (1999) 12678-12688.

DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.59.12678

Google Scholar

[4] Krishnan A., Dujardin E., Ebbesen T.W., Yianiolos P.N., Treacy M.M.J. Young's modulus of single-walled carbon nanotubes. Phys Rev B. 58 (1998) 14013–14019.

DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.58.14013

Google Scholar

[5] Demczyk B.G., Wang Y.M., Cumings J., Hetman M., Han W., Zettl A., et al. Direct mechanical measurement of the tensile strength and elastic modulus of multiwalled carbon nanotubes. Mater Sci Eng A. 334 (2002) 173–178.

DOI: 10.1016/s0921-5093(01)01807-x

Google Scholar

[6] Ke C.H., Pugno N., Peng B., Espinosa H.D. Experiments and modeling of carbon nanotube-based NEMS devices. J Mech Phys Solids. 53 (2005) 1314–1333.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmps.2005.01.007

Google Scholar

[7] Merli R., Monleón, Salvador, Lázaro, Carlos. Energy approach to the unstressed geometry of single-walled carbon nanotubes. Meccanica. 52(1-2) (2017) 213-230.

DOI: 10.1007/s11012-016-0389-z

Google Scholar

[8] Ansari R., Mirnezhad M., Sahmani S.. An accurate molecular mechanics model for computation of size-dependent elastic properties of armchair and zigzag single-walled carbon nanotubes. Meccanica. 48(6) (2013) 1355-1367.

DOI: 10.1007/s11012-012-9671-x

Google Scholar

[9] Lichun B., Ming G. Nanomechanics Model for Properties of Carbon Nanotubes Under a Thermal Environment. Acta Mechanica. 229(11) (2018) 4521-4538.

DOI: 10.1007/s00707-018-2243-y

Google Scholar

[10] Shen L., Li J. Equilibrium Structure and Strain Energy 0f Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes. Physical Review B. 71(16) (2005) 165427.

DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.71.165427

Google Scholar

[11] Daniel Sánchez-Portal, Artacho E., José M. Soler, et al. Ab-initio structural, elastic, and vibrational properties of carbon nanotubes. Physical review. B, Condensed matter. 59(19) (1998).

DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.59.12678

Google Scholar