Structural and Mechanical Characterization of 3D Printed Hydroxyapatite Scaffolds Designed for Biomedical Applications

Article Preview

Abstract:

Our current study concerns the structural analysis and mechanical properties under compressive loading of a new developed additive-manufactured hydroxyapatite (HA) scaffolds, designed for bone tissue engineering. Structural evaluation was performed by X-ray computed tomography (X-CT) and the compressive strength was determined by uniaxial testing method to compare the performance of the new structured material with those reported in the literature. The studied scaffolds showed a well-defined periodic structure with a well-controlled interconnected porosity which is about 32 %. The compressive strength was of 60 MPa and the Weibull modulus of 6. These values are higher than those generally obtained on porous scaffolds fabricated by other techniques with the same level of total porosity. These results demonstrate the potential use of this 3D printed scaffolds for load bearing bone tissue.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Solid State Phenomena (Volume 339)

Pages:

109-114

Citation:

Online since:

December 2022

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2022 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] H. Oonishi, Orthopaedic applications of hydroxyapatite, Biomaterials 12 (1991) 171-178.

Google Scholar

[2] R. Petit, The use of hydroxyapatite in orthopaedic surgery: A ten-year review, Eur. J. Orthop. Surg. Traumatol. 9 (1999) 71-74.

DOI: 10.1007/bf01695730

Google Scholar

[3] B. Zhang, X. Pei, P. Song, H. Sun, H. Li, Y. Fan, Q. Jiang, C. Zhou, X. Zhang, Porous bioceramics produced by inkjet 3D printing: Effect of printing ink formulation on the ceramic macro and micro porous architectures control, Composites Part B 155 (2018) 112-121.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.08.047

Google Scholar

[4] H. Sun, C. Hu, C. Zhou, L. Wu, J. Sun, X. Zhou, F. Xing, C. Long, Q. Kong, J. Liang, Y. Fan, X. Zhang, 3D printing of calcium phosphate scaffolds with controlled release of antibacterial functions for jaw bone repair, Mater. Des. 189 (2020) 108540.

DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2020.108540

Google Scholar

[5] C. Shuai, C. Gao, Y. Nie, H. Hu, H. Qu, S. Peng, Structural design and experimental analysis of a selective laser sintering system with nano-hydroxyapatite powder, J. Biomed. Nanotechnol. 6 (2010) 370-374.

DOI: 10.1166/jbn.2010.1139

Google Scholar

[6] C. Schmidleithner, S. Malferarri, R. Palgrave, D. Bomze, M. Schwentenwein, D.M. Kalaskar, Application of high resolution DLP stereolithography for fabrication of tricalcium phosphate scaffolds for bone regeneration, Biomed. Mater. 14 (2019) 045018.

DOI: 10.1088/1748-605x/ab279d

Google Scholar

[7] H.K. Lim, S.J. Hong, S.J. Byeon, S.M. Chung, S.W. On, B.E. Yan, J.H Lee, S.H. Byun, 3D-Printed ceramic bone scaffolds with variable pore architectures, Int. J. Mol. Sci. 21 (2020) 6942.

DOI: 10.3390/ijms21186942

Google Scholar

[8] M. Schwentenwein, P. Schneider, J. Homa, Lithography-based ceramic manufacturing: A novel technique for additive manufacturing of high-performance ceramics, Advances in Science and Technology 88 (2014) 60-64.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/ast.88.60

Google Scholar

[9] A.D. Lantada, A.D.B. Romero, M. Schwentenwein, C. Jellinek, J. Homa, Lithography-based ceramic manufacture (LCM) of auxetic structures: present capabilities and challenges, Smart Mater. Struct. 25 (2016) 054015.

DOI: 10.1088/0964-1726/25/5/054015

Google Scholar

[10] F.J. O'Brien, Biomaterials and scaffolds for tissue engineering, Mater. Today 14 (2011) 88-95.

Google Scholar

[11] C.M. Murphy, F.J. O'Brien, D.G. Little, A. Schindeler, Cell-scaffold interactions in the bone tissue engineering triad, European Cells and Materials 26 (2013) 120-132.

DOI: 10.22203/ecm.v026a09

Google Scholar

[12] J.Y. Buffière, E. Maire, J. Adrien, J.P. Masse, E. Boller, In situ experiments with X-ray tomography: An attractive tool for experimental mechanics, Exp. Mech. 50 (2010) 289-305.

DOI: 10.1007/s11340-010-9333-7

Google Scholar

[13] A.G. Evans, E.A. Charles, Fracture toughness determination, J. Am. Soc. 59 (1976).

Google Scholar

[14] ASTM C1424-15, Standard Test Method for Monotonic Compressive Strength of Advanced Ceramics at Ambient Temperature, Annual Book of ASTM Standards, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, (2015).

Google Scholar

[15] C. Benaqqa, J. Chevalier, M. Saadaoui, G. Fantozzi, Slow crack growth behaviour of hydroxyapatite ceramics, Biomaterials 26 (2005) 6106-6112.

DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.03.031

Google Scholar

[16] C. Shuai, P. Li, J. Liu, S. Peng, Optimization of TCP/HAP ratio for better properties of calcium phosphate scaffold via selective laser sintering, Materials characterization 77 (2013) 23-31.

DOI: 10.1016/j.matchar.2012.12.009

Google Scholar

[17] M.S. Barabashko, M.V. Tkachenko, A.A. Neiman, A.N. Ponomarev, A.E. Rezvanova, Variation of Vickers microhardness and compression strength of the bioceramics based on hydroxyapatite by adding the multi-walled carbon nanotubes, Appl. Nanosci. 10 (2020) 2601-2608.

DOI: 10.1007/s13204-019-01019-z

Google Scholar

[18] D.M. Liu, Preparation and characterisation of porous hydroxyapatite bioceramic via slip-casting route, Ceramics International 24 (1998) 441-446.

DOI: 10.1016/s0272-8842(97)00033-3

Google Scholar

[19] D.S. Metsger, M.R. Rieger, D.W. Foreman, Mechanical properties of sintered hydroxyapatite and tricalcium phosphate ceramic, J.Mater.Sci: Materials in medicine 10 (1999) 441-446.

Google Scholar

[20] P. Miranda, A. Pajares, E. Saiz, A.P. Tomsia, F. Guiberteau, Mechanical properties of calcium phosphate scaffolds fabricated by robocasting, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 85 (2008) 218-227.

DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.31587

Google Scholar

[21] E. Giesen, M. Ding, M. Dalstra, T. Van Eijden, Mechanical properties of cancellous bone in the human mandibular condyle are anisotropic, J. Biomech. 34 (2001) 799-803.

DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9290(01)00030-6

Google Scholar

[22] AA. White, SM. Best, IA Kinloch, Hydroxyapatite–carbon nanotube composites for biomedical applications, Int. J. Appl. Ceram. Technol. 4 (2007) 1-13.

Google Scholar

[23] D.M. Liu, Control of pore geometry on influencing the mechanical property of porous hydroxyapatite bioceramic, J. Mater. Sci. Lett. 15 (1996) 419-442.

DOI: 10.1007/bf00277185

Google Scholar

[24] T.M.G. Chu, D.G. Orton, S.J. Hollister, S.E. Feinberg, J.W. Halloran, Mechanical and in vivo performance of hydroxyapatite implants with controlled architectures, Biomaterials 23 (2002) 1283-1293.

DOI: 10.1016/s0142-9612(01)00243-5

Google Scholar

[25] P. Miranda, A. Pajares, E. Saiz, A.P. Tomsia, F. Guiberteau, Fracture modes under uniaxial compression in hydroxyapatite scaffolds fabricated by robocasting, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 83 (2007) 646-655.

DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.31272

Google Scholar

[26] J. Roleček, L. Pejchalová, F.J. Martínez-Vázquez, P. Miranda González, D. Salamon, Bioceramic scaffolds fabrication: Indirect 3D printing combined with ice-templating vs. robocasting, J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 39 (2019) 1595-1602.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2018.12.006

Google Scholar