In Vivo Evaluation of Calcium-Phosphate Ceramics with Highly-Interconnected Pores Using Porcine Tibia Defect Model

Article Preview

Abstract:

The aim of this study was to compare the difference in bone formation between hydroxyapatite (HAp) and β-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP) ceramics with similar porous structure. Porous HAp and β-TCP ceramics (total porosity: ~70%) with highly-interconnected structure were fabricated by firing calcium-phosphate fiber mixed with carbon beads (~150 μm). The size of highly-interconnected pores was measured by mercury intrusion technique. Each sample (ϕ4 mm × 8 mm) was implanted into the tibial bone defect (ϕ4.2 mm × 8 mm) of a pig (2 years old, male). After 6 weeks of implantation, undecalcified section was prepared and stained with hematoxylin and eosin (HE) stain. New bone area and remaining material area were evaluated.Interconnection sizes of HAp and β-TCP ceramics were 23.0 µm and 15.6 µm, respectively. New bone area of β-TCP ceramics was significantly higher compared to HAp ceramics. Remaining material ratio was 77.1 ± 3.3% for β-TCP ceramics whereas HAp ceramics remained stable. Bone formation in HAp ceramics was inhomogeneous compared to β-TCP ceramics in HE stained section. Although the β-TCP ceramics interconnection size was smaller, higher resorption may have played a positive role in homogeneous bone formation. According to the result of the study, it is suggested that highly-interconnected porous ceramics made by β-TCP could be a suitable material for bone regeneration.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Solid State Phenomena (Volume 340)

Pages:

113-117

Citation:

Online since:

December 2022

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2022 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] M. Mastrogiacomo, S. Scaglione, R. Martinetti, L. Dolcini, F. Beltrame, R. Cancedda and R. Quarto: Biomaterials Vol. 27 (2006), 3230-3237.

DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.01.031

Google Scholar

[2] M.C. Doernberg, B. Rechenberg, M. Bohner, S. Grunenfelder, G.H. Lenthe, R. Muller, B. Gasser, R. Mathys, G. Baroud and J. Auer: Biomaterials Vol. 27 (2006), 5186-5198.

DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.05.051

Google Scholar

[3] M. Kawata, H. Uchida, K. Itatani, I. Okada, S. Koda and M. Aizawa: J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. Vol. 15 (2004), 817-823.

Google Scholar

[4] N. Osada, Y. Shigemitsu, M. Makita, K. Oribe and M. Aizawa: Key Engineering Materials Vol. 493-494, (2012), 556-560.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/kem.493-494.556

Google Scholar

[5] Y. Shigemitsu, N. Sugiyama, K. Oribe, M. Rikukawa and M. Aizawa: J. Ceram. Soc. Jpn. Vol. 118 (2010), 1181-1187.

DOI: 10.2109/jcersj2.118.1181

Google Scholar