Effect of Process Condition and Test Environment on Tensile Properties in Cold-Rolled Al-Cu-Mg Alloys

Abstract:

Severe plastic deformation processing and subsequent aging treatment have been known to be effective for achieving higher strength than the conventional aging treatment in aluminum alloys. This study prepared the Al-Cu-Mg-based alloy sample, Al-5.3Cu-2.8Mg (mass%). The alloys were solution treated at 480, 495 and 505°C, and cold-rolled by 90%. The effect of process condition and test environment on tensile properties in cold-rolled Al-Cu-Mg alloys was investigated. Results confirm that strength and ductility were improved with increasing the solution heat treatment temperature regardless of test environment. 0.2% proof stress and ultimate tensile strength were higher than aging treatment specimens, but elongation to failure was lower than aged one. Hydrogen embrittlement susceptibility increased with increasing solution treatment temperature. Ductile fracture with many dimples is observed in both cold-rolled and aged specimens. Second-phase particles were observed at the bottom of the dimples. There was no significant difference in fracture surface between the different test environments.

• Periodical: Solid State Phenomena (Volume 353)
• Pages: 91-96
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/p-x1RGc0
• Online since: December 2023
• Authors: Yuki Ishii*, Junya Kobayashi, Equo Kobayashi, Masato Ohnuma, Shigeru Kuramoto, Goroh Itoh
• Keywords: Al-Cu-Mg, Cold Rolling, Hydrogen Embrittlement, Second Phase Particle, Slow Strain Rate Technique

References

[1] Z. Horita: J. JILM, 60 (2010), 134-141.

[2] R. Z. Valiev, N. A. Enikeev, M. Y. Murashkin, V. U. Kazykhanov and X. Sauvage: Scr. Mater., 63 (2010), 949-952.

[3] S. Kuramoto, K. Horibuchi, I. Aoi and K. Oh-ishi: J. JILM, 64 (2014), 241-248.

[4] H. Adachi, D. Terada and N. Tsuji: J. JILM, 69 (2019), 555-561.

[5] T. Masuda, Z. Horita: J. JILM, 67 (2017), 519-520.

[6] Y. Nakajima, S. Kuramoto, J. Kobayashi, G. Itoh, K. Oh-ishi, I. Aoi and Y. Shimizu: J. JILM, 68 (2018), 621-626.

[7] H. Tadenuma, S. Kuramoto, J. Kobayashi, G. Itoh, I. Aoi and Y. Shimizu: J. JILM, 69 (2019), 312-314.

[8] E. Kobayashi, M. Ohnuma, S. Kuramoto, J. Kobayashi and G. Itoh: J. JILM, 71 (2021), 562-568.

[9] N. Kirekawa, M. O, J. Kobayashi, M. Ohnuma, S. Kuramoto, G. Itoh and E. Kobayashi: J. JILM, 71 (2021), 562-568.

[10] M. Safyari, M. Moshtaghi and S. Kuramoto: Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 799 (2021), 139850.

[11] G. Itoh, T. Eto, M. Miyamoto and M. Kanno: J. JILM, 38 (1988), 831-833.

[12] K. Ichitani and K. Koyama: Furukawa-Sky Review,19 5 (2009), 20-28.

[13] K. Horikawa, Y. Hariki and H. Kobayashi: J. JILM, 68 (2018), 603-609.

[14] R. Yamada, G. Itoh, A. Kurumada and M. Nakai: J. Japan, Inst. Met. Mater., 80 (2016), 745-752.

[15] G. Itoh, K. Hiyama, B. Lyu, J. Kobayashi and S. Kuramoto: Mater. Sci. Forum, 1662-9752 (2021), 1811-1815.

[16] T. Manaka, T. Suzuki, K. Hiyama, J. Kobayashi, S. Kuramoto and G. Itoh: Pcoc. ICAA17, 326 (2020), 04009.