Dopant Activation Comparison in Phosphorus and Nitrogen Implanted 4H-Silicon Carbide

Article Preview

Abstract:

Bulk mobility and dopant activation of implanted species into 4H-SiC plays a crucial role in the carrier conduction, blocking behavior, and channel properties of a 4H-SiC vertical power MOSFET. Nitrogen and phosphorus ion implantation became the norm as n-type dopants for 4H-SiC. Therefore, the doping and temperature behavior of both species in 4H-SiC needs to be well characterized. In this study, we report a comparison in electrical characteristics between nitrogen and phosphorus implanted 4H-SiC as a function of temperature for various doping levels. For this purpose, 4-point van der Pauw samples are prepared, resistivity and Hall measurements are conducted. We found that resistivities drop as temperature increases from 140 K with phosphorus having higher resistivities at all implanted doping concentrations. The carrier concentrations increase with increase of temperature, indicating incomplete ionization of dopants. Mobilities drop at low temperature due to increased impurity scattering, reaches a peak near 300 K and drops at higher temperature due to increased phonon scattering. From the obtained data, using a two-level charge neutrality equation, the activation percentage and ionization energies of dopants in hexagonal and cubic sites for both species are extracted and compared.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] T. Kimoto, J.A. Cooper, Fundamentals of Silicon Carbide Technology (John Wiley & Sons, Singapore 2014).

Google Scholar

[2] M.S. Janson; M. K. Linnarsson; A. Hallén; B. G. Svensson, J. Appl. Phys. 93, 8903–8909 (2003)

Google Scholar

[3] M.A. Capano, J.A. Cooper, Jr., M.R. Melloch, A. Saxler and W.C. Mitchel, J. Appl. Phys. 87, 8773 (2000).

Google Scholar

[4] J. Pernot, W. Zawadzki, S. Contreras, J. L. Robert, E. Neyret, and L. Di Cioccio, J. Appl. Phys 90, 1869 (2001).

DOI: 10.1063/1.1382849

Google Scholar

[5] W. Gotz, A. Schoner, and G. Pens1, W. Suttrop and W. J. Choyke, R. Stein and S. Leibenzeder; Applied Physics 73, 3332 (1993)

Google Scholar

[6] M. Laube, F. Schmid, G. Pensl, and G. Wagner, Materials Science Forum, 389-393, 791 (2002)

Google Scholar

[7] J. Pernot, S. Contreras and J. Camassel, Journal of Applied Physics 126, 145701 (2019)

Google Scholar

[8] F. Schmid and G. Pensl, Appl. Phys. Lett. 84, 3064 (2004)

Google Scholar

[9] D.J. Lichtenwalner, J.H., Park, S. Rogers, H. Dixit, A. Scholtze, S. Bubel, and S.H. Ryu, Materials Science Forum, 1089, 3–7 (2023).

DOI: 10.4028/p-w8i0hf

Google Scholar