Influence of Hydrogen Content on the Ductile Rupture of Advanced High-Strength Steels

Article Preview

Abstract:

Advanced high-strength steels exhibit sensitivity to diffusible hydrogen content, mainly observed during tensile testing. Although the initial yield stress and ultimate tensile strength are not significantly affected, ductility decreases with increasing hydrogen content. This sensitivity to diffusible hydrogen depends on strain rate and stress concentrations. This study examines the influence of diffusible hydrogen content on the ductile fracture of DP780GI steel, in the form of 1 mm thick sheets. Samples were prepared with specific geometries, with notches and holes, to study different mechanical states, and fracture tests were performed to evaluate ductility as a function of hydrogen content and stress triaxiality. The local strain rate was around 1 × 10−4 s−1, which is lower than the value used in industrial applications, to enhance the hydrogen sensitivity. A hydrogen charging process was used, including zinc coating removal, electrochemical loading, and electrolytic deposition of a zinc layer to prevent hydrogen desorption. The hydrogen content was measured by thermal desorption analysis after the mechanical testing. It is observed that the maximum local elongation decreases with increasing hydrogen content, with a noticeable effect above 0.25 ppm. Cracks form in areas of maximum effective deformation, and their location varies depending on the geometry of the sample and the hydrogen content. The evolution of the maximum effective strain before fracture shows a significant decrease in ductility with increasing hydrogen content, regardless of the mechanical state.

You have full access to the following eBook

Info:

Periodical:

Solid State Phenomena (Volume 388)

Pages:

81-89

Citation:

Online since:

April 2026

Export:

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] T.Depover,D.PérezEscobar,E.Wallaert,Z.ZermoutandK.Verbeken:Int.J.HydrogenEnergy Vol. 39 (2014), 4647-4656

Google Scholar

[2] S.K. Dwivedi and M. Vishwakarma: Int. J. Hydrogen Energy Vol. 44 (2018), 28007-28030

Google Scholar

[3] A. Kumar and S.K. Paul: Forces in Mechanics Vol. 13 (2023), 100237

Google Scholar

[4] T.Depover,A.Elmahdy,F.Vercruysse,P.VerleysenandK.Verbeken:EPJWebofConferences Vol. 183 (2018), 03015

Google Scholar

[5] C. Zhao, W. Wu, J. Deng, M. Yu, Y. Peng, X. Wang and J. Gong: Eng. Failure Analysis Vol. 166 (2024), 108880

Google Scholar

[6] M.B. Djukic, G. M.Bakic, V. S. Zeravcic, A. Sedmark and B. Rajicic: Eng. Fracture Mech. Vol. 216 (2019), 106528

Google Scholar

[7] W. Zhao, W. Chen, Z. Zhao, S. Kuang, J. Liu and L. Sun: Mater. Res. Express Vol. 8 (2021), 126510

Google Scholar

[8] H2FORM3Gwebsite https://eurecat.org/portfolio-items/h2form3g/

Google Scholar

[9] B. Pan, Z. Jiang, F. Shen, B. Tekkaya and S. Munstermann: Steel Research Int. (2025), 2500266

Google Scholar

[10] P. Prislupcak, T. Kvackaj J. Bidulska, S. Nemeth, M. Demcakova, R. Gburik and V. Kundracik: Acta Metall. Slovaca Vol 28 (2022), 212-218

Google Scholar

[11] R.S. Varanasi, M. Koyama, Y. Shibayama, S. Chiba, S. Ajito, T. Hojo and E. Akiyama: Metall. Mater. trans. A 54 (2023), 2989-2997

DOI: 10.1007/s11661-023-07096-8

Google Scholar

[12] A. Kacem, H. Laurent and S. Thuillier: Eng. Fracture Mech. Vol. 248 (2021), 107686

Google Scholar

[13] T. Omura: Steel Research Int. 52 (2012), 267-273

Google Scholar

[14] T. Depover, S. Hertelé and K. Verbeken: Eng. Fracture Mech. Vol. 221 (2019), 106704

Google Scholar