Improved Mapping of Yield Locus Distortion through a Strain-Dependent Calibration of the Barlat Yld2000-2d Yield Criterion

Article Preview

Abstract:

Accurate modeling of the real material behavior is fundamental to improve the accuracy of the finite element analysis (FEA) of sheet metal forming processes. Classical material models such as Hill’48 or Barlat Yld2000-2d do not consider the material behavior under plane strain and shear, even though these states are the primary cause of failures observed in sheet metal forming. Moreover, yield criteria are conventionally calibrated at the onset of plastic deformation to determine the initial yield locus. Isotropic hardening is subsequently assumed, based on the flow curve under uniaxial tension. However, some modern sheet metals exhibit a pronounced distortional hardening behavior, which cannot be sufficiently mapped by the conventional modeling strategy. Hence, this contribution aims to improve the mapping of the yield locus distortion by considering the plane strain and shear stress states and by performing the parameter calibration at higher plastic strains. Hereby, the yield locus exponent of the Barlat Yld2000-2d is adapted in order to accurately map the material behavior under plane strain or shear. Moreover, the influence of a strain-dependent calibration of the yield locus on the mapping accuracy is investigated. Two materials, AA5182 and DP600, are being investigated. It is observed that the consideration of the plane strain state leads to a reduction of the yield locus exponent while the consideration of the shear stress state is accompanied with an increase of the yield locus exponent.

You have full access to the following eBook

Info:

Periodical:

Solid State Phenomena (Volume 390)

Pages:

1-9

Citation:

Online since:

April 2026

Export:

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] F. Barlat, J.C. Brem, J.W. Yoon, K. Chung, R.E. Dick, D.J. Lege, F. Pourboghrat, S.-H. Choi and E. Chu, Plane stress yield function for aluminum alloy sheets—part 1: theory, International Journal of Plasticity 19(2003)9, p.1297–1319.

DOI: 10.1016/s0749-6419(02)00019-0

Google Scholar

[2] Y. Hou, K. Du, A.A. El-Aty, M.-G. Lee, J. Min, Plastic anisotropy of sheet metals under plane strain loading: A novel non-associated constitutive model based on fourth-order polynomial functions, Materials & Design 223(2022), 111187.

DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2022.111187

Google Scholar

[3] M.D. Xavier, R.L. Plaut and C.G. Schön, Uniaxial Near Plane Strain Tensile Tests Applied to the Determination of the FLC Formabillity Parameter, Materials Research 17(2014)4, pp.982-986.

DOI: 10.1590/s1516-14392014005000083

Google Scholar

[4] J.H. Kim, J.H. Sung, K. Piao and R.H. Wagoner, The shear fracture of dual-phase steel, International Journal of Plasticity 27(2011)10, pp.1658-1676.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijplas.2011.02.009

Google Scholar

[5] A.W. Hudgins, D.K. Matlock, J.G. Speer and C.J. Van Tyne, Predicting instability at die radii in advanced high strength steels, Journal of Materials Processing Technology 210(2010)5, pp.741-750.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2009.12.012

Google Scholar

[6] B.A. Behrens, C. Bonk and I. Peshekhodov, On modelling of shear fracture in deep drawing of a high-strength dual-phase sheet steel, Journal of Physics: Conference Series 896(2017), 012125.

DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/896/1/012125

Google Scholar

[7] J.W. Yoon, F. Barlat, R.E. Dick, K. Chung and T.J. Kang, Plane stress yield function for aluminum alloy sheets—part II: FE formulation and its implementation, International Journal of Plasticity 20(2004)3, p.495–522.

DOI: 10.1016/s0749-6419(03)00099-8

Google Scholar

[8] H. Wang, M. Wan, X. Wu and Y. Yan, The equivalent plastic strain-dependent Yld2000-2d yield function and the experimental verification. Computational Materials Science 47(2009)1, pp.12-22.

DOI: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2009.06.008

Google Scholar

[9] N. Küsters and A. Brosius, An adapted yield criterion for the evolution of subsequent yield surfaces. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 896(2017), 012020.

DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/896/1/012020

Google Scholar

[10] M. Rentz and M. Merklein, Improvement of material modeling by considering the plane strain and shear stress state in the Yld2000-2d yield criterion, Journal of Physics: Conference Series 3104(2025), 012004.

DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/3104/1/012004

Google Scholar

[11] M. Lenzen and M. Merklein, Determination of strain dependent anisotropy in layer compression tests and resulting influence on the yield locus modelling, In NUMIFORM 2019: The 13th International Conference on Numerical Methods in Industrial Forming Processes, 2019.

Google Scholar

[12] M. Lenzen and M. Merklein, Improvement of Numerical Modelling Considering Plane Strain Material Characterization with an Elliptic Hydraulic Bulge Test, Journal of Manufacturing and Materials Processing 2(2018)1, 6.

DOI: 10.3390/jmmp2010006

Google Scholar

[13] M. Merklein and M. Biasutti, Forward and Reverse Simple Shear Test Experiments for Material Modeling in Forming Simulations, in: G. Hirt and A.E. Tekkaya, Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Technology of Plasticity, ICTP 2011, pp.702-707.

Google Scholar