Search results

Tests the boride and substrate microhardness with the HX-1 micro sclerometer.
Table 1 Chemical composition of Fe-B-C alloy Element C B Si Mn Cr P S Contents (%) 0.08~0.20 1.0~2.5 0.5~1.5 0.5~1.5 0.5~1.5 <0.04 <0.04 Results and Discussions Cast Structure of Fe-B-C alloy The cast Fe-B-C alloy structure on boride and substrate is shown in Figure 1.
References [1] G Kartal and S Timur: JOM, Vol.56, No.11 (2004): 360~365
[6] Ya E Gol'dshtein: Metal Sci and Heat Treatment, Vol.30, No.7-8 (1989): 479~484
[9] A Ghosh, B Mishra and S Das: Materials Sci and Eng A, Vol.396, No.1-2 (2005): 320~332

High temperature oxidation of TiAl-1.5wt.
Experimental procedure Alloys prepared by mechanical alloying followed by the spark plasma sintering (MA-SPS) process were Ti34Al-1.5Mn in wt.% (Ti47.8Al-1.0Mn in mol%; hereafter referred to as TiAl-Mn), Ti34Al-1.5Mn-5Y2O3 in wt.% (Ti49.4Al-1.1Mn-0.9Y2O3 in mol%; hereafter TiAl-Mn-5Y2O3), and Ti34Al-1.5Mn-10Y2O3 in wt.% (Ti51.0Al-1.1Mn-1.8Y2O3 in mol%; hereafter TiAl-Mn-10Y2O3).
Table 1.
References [1] K.
Forum, 475/479 (2005) p. 767 [9] Y.

The calculation was the equation (1)
It was because that the anoxic zone 2 and aerobic 1 took place in turn, and the experiment was operated under the volume ratio of anaerobic/anoxic/aerobic of 1/0.5/3.6 and 1/1.7/2.4 alternatively.
Reference [1] G.
Water Sci Technol, 1996, 34 (1) : 119 - 128
Water Sci Technol, 2001, 43(1): 155-164

[1].
The near band gap emission (NBE) occurs at 411-412 nm and the blue or deep level emission (DLE) is at 479-481 nm.
Templating agent D [nm] NBE [nm] DLE [nm] RΩ [kΩ] RCT [kΩ] σ [µS m-1] C [pF] T-80 9 411 479 0.86 64 157 542 PVP-PEG 17 412 481 1.11 67 178 435 Photoelectrical properties.
Comparative dye-degradation profiles [0.020 g-catalyst loading, 7.8 mL s-1 airflow rate, 9.3 mg L-1 dissolved O2, 365 nm, 25.4 μEinstein L-1 s-1, 5.5 pH, 25 mL dye solution].
References [1] X.

Some of the work is conducted in collaboration with other research centers [5-9]. 1.
a) b) Fig. 1.
Program 2 Eject cylinders in order: 1-2-3-4.
Stresses indicated by strain gauge 1 Fig. 8.
[18] Gwiazda A., et al., Motion analysis of mechatronic equipment considering the example of the Stewart platform, Solid State Phenomena 220/221 (2015) 479-484

FT IR (cm-1): 1701, 2732. 1-(4-(tert-Butyldimethylsilyloxy)phenyl)-2-propyn-1-ol 3.
FT IR (cm-1): 2118, 3310.
Table 1.
Fig. 1.
References [1] S.

Other components include bicyclo[3.1.0]hex-3- en-2-one, 5-(1-methylethyl)- (2.3%), 2-cyclohexen-1-ol,1-methyl-4-(1-methylethyl)-,(1R,4S) (0.9%), bicycle[3.1.1]heptan-3-ol,6,6-dimethyl-2-methylene-,(1S,3R,5S)-(trans-pinoca, 3.7%), 2,6-dimethyl- 2,6-Octadiene (3.9%), 3-thujene (0.3%), palmitic acid (0.2%), stearic acid (0.2%), etc.
(Table 1).
Table 1.
Remaining time (min) Area (%) Compound 1 7.5 0.252 3-Thujene 2 7.7 1.009 (1S)-(-)-alpha-Pinene 3 7.9 1.135 Camphene 4 8.4 1.589 Sabenene 5 8.5 1.387 beta-Pinene 6 9.4 16.494 Benzene,1,2,3,4-tetramethyl- 7 9.5 0.605 Cyclohexene,1-methyl-4-(1-methylethenyl)-, (4R)- 8 10.1 0.202 g-Terpinene 9 10.2 2.648 Cyclohexanol, 1-methyl-4-(1-methylethenyl)-, cis- 10 10.3 0.151 4-Methylphenol 11 10.6 0.101 1-methyl-4-(1-methylethenyl)-Benzene 12 10.9 2.320 Bicyclo[3.1.0]hex-3-en-2-one, 5-(1-methylethyl)- 13 11.2 0.933 2-Cyclohexen-1-ol,1-methyl-4-(1-methylethyl)-, (1R,4S) 14 11.6 3.707 Bicyclo[3.1.1]heptan-3-ol,6,6-dimethyl-2-methylene-, (1S,3R,5S)- 15 12.1 2.976 L(-)-Borneol 16 12.3 4.338 Terpinen-4-ol 17 12.5 4.439 (−)-Myrtenal 18 13.9 0.555 4-(1-methylethyl)-1-Cyclohexene-1-carboxaldehyde 19 14.0 0.504 6-Octen-1-ol,3,7-dimethyl-,1-formate 20 14.3 20.151 L-bornyl acetate 21 15.1 0.378 7-Ethenyl-1,2,3,4,4a,4b,5,6,7,9,10,10a-dodecahydro- 6-hydroxy-1,4a,7-trimethyl-1-phenanthrenecarboxyl 22 15.3 3.884
Lambert: Can J Physiol Pharmacol. vol. 87 (2009), p, 479-492

Two parameters were studied to determine the optimum condition to produce WO3 nanostructures which were ratio of sodium tungstate dehydrate to cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) concentration (1:1, 2:1, 4:1, 6: 1) and pH of the hydrothermal reaction solution (pH 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5).
Figure 3 shows the XRD pattern of the WO3 nanostructures for concentration ratios of 4:1 and 6:1.
Fig. 2: Surface morphology of WO3 nanostructures formed at various concentration ratio of precursor solution Na2WO4.2H2O to CTAB ratio: (a) 1:1, (b) 2:1, (c) 4:1, (d) 6: 1 and (e) cross-section of (d).
References [1] B.W.
Garnier: Thin Solid Films Vol. 479 (2005), p. 201– 206 [6] L.

The reaction type (1) starting temperatures are listed in Tab3 (ΔGT=0).
Fig.1 The reaction (1) relationship under different pressure the Gibbs free energy and temperature Tab3.
According to tab3~5: The reaction (1~3) under the same pressure, With the increase of temperature, indium oxide carbothermal reaction more easily, The carbon content of materials with high In2O3:C molar ratio of 1:3, The reaction can generate elemental In;When the carbon content of less than In2O3:C molar ratio of 1:3, will produce intermediate InO, In2O.
Mineral Deposits,2007,26(4):475-479
Copper Engineering,2011(1):25-29

Results Densities of green bodies and sintered specimens are presented in Table 1.
Table 1.
References [1] C.P.
Li, Influence of Toughening Method on Microstructures and Mechanical Properties of Alumina-Matrix Composites, Materials Science Forum 475-479 (2005) 909-912
CIEC11, Lausanne (2008) 1-8