Search results

Parameter Stand number 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Rolling force, ton 112 78 83 60 58 41 39 28 26 17 Rolling torque, kNm 300 202 194 131 100 75 54 43 30 19 Length of deformation zone, mm 113 115 89 92 91 91 75 75 62 57 Contact area, mm2 9259 6631 5809 4595 3482 2750 2024 1715 1270 896 Angle of contact, degree 36 38 28 29 33 33 32 33 26 30 Maximum wear, micron 681 706 2070 1370 903 1156 1228 1411 867 1148 Axial wear, micron 534 696 370 468 903 1141 1228 1277 867 1030 Rolls Durability Important parameter affecting production economic efficiency is durability of the rolls of hot rolling mill.

Tab.4 LF, LF/HF values of subjects in simulating driving experiment execise LF（beat/minute） LF/HF In Calm 45.3412.43 3.011.03 1st 82.348.23 6.621.07 2nd 78.459.34 6.313.45 3rd 76.357.45 5.896.34 4th 78.344.23 5.562.45 5th 69.8310.34 5.463.24 6th 65.4514.35 4.811.45 7th 63.3410.56 4.210.31 8th 60.569.45 3.623.45 9th 58.7711.23 3.100.44 In table 4, the values of LF and LF/HF were gradually approach to the values in clam with the training times increased.

., vol. 3, no. 7, pp. 896–909, 2016, doi: 10.1039/c6qi00042h

., 9 (2028) 886-896

Table 1 Shift combination and number of stages Input Size Z Shift Combination Number of Stages Benes Network Cyclic Shifter Percentage Decline (%) Benes Network Cyclic Shifter Percentage Decline (%) [17] [19] [17] [19] 32 497 497 31 93.76 9 9 5 44.44 64 2,017 2,017 63 96.87 11 11 6 45.45 128 8,129 8,129 127 98.43 13 13 7 46.15 Table 2 Logic gates used in shifter Input Size Z 2 × 1 MUXs NAND Gates Inverters Benes Network (Unit) Cyclic Shifter (Unit) Percentage Decline (%) Benes Network (Unit) Cyclic Shifter (Unit) Percentage Decline (%) Benes Network (Unit) Cyclic Shifter (Unit) Percentage Decline (%) [17] [19] [17] [19] [17] [19] 32 288 288 160 44.44 864 864 480 44.44 9 9 5 44.44 64 704 704 384 45.45 2,112 2,112 1,152 45.45 11 11 6 45.45 128 1,664 1,664 896 46.15 4,992 4,992 2,688 46.15 13 13 7 46.15 Table 3 Comparison of shifter controller Input Size Z [19] Cyclic Shifter (bits) Percentage Decline (%) [17] Cyclic Shifter (bits) Percentage Decline (%) Benes

Table2 Experimental conditions of EGSB-A2/O system Stage I II III IV Reflux ratio 50% 100% 200% 300% Influent COD concentration [mg/l] 3200-3500 3225-3345 3340-3400 3000-3500 Influent TN concentration [mg/l] 824-893 896-965 915-946 876-916 Influent NH4+-N concentration[mg/l] 750-790 792-893 840-874 800-820 NO2--N concentration in anaerobic reactor[mg/L] 195-235 150-180 185-225 200-230 NO2--N loading rate [kg/m3/d] 0.21-0.25 0.32-0.39 0.79-0.96 1.30-1.48 Analytical Methods.

Proc. 896 (2007) 50-60

Energy Policy 38 (2010) 896–901 ].

Quantity Standard work time Stage 1 Stage 2 Stage 3 1 35 2016 896 1024 2 444 554 299 345 3 112 554 299 345 4 314 576 360 360 5 450 554 299 276 6 72 612 312 360 7 54 648 360 360 8 269 677 375 375 9 95 2484 1080 936 10 36 554 322 322 11 45 554 299 345 12 2813 554 268 268 13 187 524 268 268 14 85 524 268 268 15 63 524 268 247 16 1204 588 299 276 17 151 588 299 276 18 48 588 299 276 19 36 588 299 276 Table 5: Comparison of improved and original layout N1 N2 N3 S1 S2 S3 UPPH Average Cost Original 4 4 4 35 14 17 0.7878 34.90 Improved 8 4 6 17 14 12 1.4913 22.06 Conclusion This research builds a model on production line layout problem and offers simple yet effective solutions under various resource constraints.

ISIJ International 45(6) (2005) 896-902 [10] X.Vanden Eynde, J.