Numerical Modeling of Cantilever Retaining Wall Using EPS Geofoam

Abstract:

Earth retaining wall structures are common civil engineering structures. Estimation of magnitude and distribution of earth pressure on retaining structures under different surcharge loading conditions is essential as they influence the design and overall economy of retaining structures. Numerical modeling using finite element code PLAXIS is used static analysis. 7 m height of non-yielding cantilever retaining wall with and without EPS geofoam structure is studied and 20 m backfill width was considered. In the present study backfill was modeled as Mohr-Coulomb yield criteria and EPS geofoam and wall were modeled as Linear-elastic. EPS geofoam densities namely 12 kg/m³ and 15 kg/m³ and two different geofoam thicknesses 0.107H and 0.143H were used for static analysis. Three different surcharge loading namely 10 kPa,30kPa and 50kPa which were kept at a distance of 2.0 m away from the wall face. In the static analysis earth pressure distribution for wall with and without geofoam were analyzed. Approximately 50% isolation efficiency was reported. At lower surcharge loads the effectiveness of EPS is more as compare to higher surcharge load and with increase in surcharge load, isolation efficiency gradually decreases and isolation efficiency decreases with increase in buffer modulus. Apart from these serviceability criteria was also checked. Serviceability criteria comprise of lateral deformation of EPS geofoam at sand-geofoam interface and backfill surface settlement were studied. Lower EPS geofoam density and higher EPS geofoam thickness reduces higher magnitude of earth pressure but in this combination the backfill surface settlement was coming very high.

• Periodical: Advanced Engineering Forum (Volume 52)
• Pages: 45-64
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/p-WvJmO3
• Online since: July 2024
• Authors: Rashid Mustafa*
• Keywords: Cantilever Retaining Wall, EPS Geofoam, Isolation Efficiency, Numerical Modelling, Plaxis^2D

References

[1] J. S. Horvath, Compressible inclusion function of EPS geofoam, Geotextile and Geomembranes. 15(1997) 77-120.

DOI: 10.1016/s0266-1144(97)00008-3

[2] J. S. Horvath, The compressible inclusion functions of EPS geofoam: An overview of concepts, applications and products, Res. Rpt. No. CE/GE-98-1, Manhattan Coll. Civ. Engg. Dept., Bronx, NY. (1998a).

[3] J. S. Horvath, The compressible-inclusion functions of EPS geofoam: analysis and design methodologies', Res. Rpt. No. CE/GE-98-2, Manhattan Coll. Civ. Eng. Dept., Bronx. (1998b).

[4] J. S. Horvath, Expanded polystyrene (EPS) geofoam: an introduction to material behavior, J. Geotextiles and Geomembranes. 23 (1994) 263-280.

DOI: 10.1016/0266-1144(94)90048-5

[5] J.P. Magnan, J.F. Serratrice, Mechanical properties of expanded polystyrene for applications in road embankment, Laboratoire Central Ponts et Chaussees, paris, France, Bull Liaison LCPC, No. 164 (1989) 25–31.

[6] S. Zarnani, R. Bathurst, Numerical parametric study of geofoam seismic buffers with different constitutive models. 26 (2010) 1665-1670.

[7] O. L. Ertugrul, A. C. Trandafir, Reduction of lateral earth forces acting on rigid non-yielding retaining walls by EPS geofoam inclusions, Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering. 23 (2011) 1711-1718.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)mt.1943-5533.0000348

[8] D. Wang, R. J. Bathurst, Numerical analysis of earthquake load mitigation on rigid retaining walls using EPS geofoam, The open civil engineering journal. 6 (2012) 21-25.

DOI: 10.2174/1874149501206010021

[9] Z. A. Athanasopoulos, K. Lamote, G. A. Athanasopoulos, Use of EPS geofoam compressible inclusions for reducing the earthquake effects on yielding earth retaining structures, Journal of Soil dynamics and earthquake engineering. 41(2012) 59-71.

DOI: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2012.05.004

[10] O.L. Ertugrul, A.C. Trandafir, Reduction of lateral earth forces on yielding flexible retaining walls by EPS geofoam inclusions, Geo Congress. (2012) 2068-2077.

DOI: 10.1061/9780784412121.212

[11] S. Zarnani, R.J. Bathurst, Numerical investigation of geofoam seismic buffers using FLAC, Geotextiles and Geomembranes. 26(2005) 371 -378.

DOI: 10.1016/j.geotexmem.2008.02.004

[12] A.C. Trandafir, O.L. Ertugrul, Earthquake response of a gravity retaining wall with geofoam inclusion, Geo-Frontiers. (2011) 3177-3185

DOI: 10.1061/41165(397)325

[13] A. Bhattacharjee, A. Muralikrishna, Behavior of gravity retaining walls subjected to seismic excitation using FLAC 3D, International Journal of Earth Sciences and Engineering. 04 (2011) 71-74.

[14] A.F. Elargi, Selected engineering properties and applications of EPS geofoam. (2006) 1-39.

[15] V.K. Gade, D. Murty, Short- and long-term behavior of EPS geofoam in reduction of lateral earth pressure on rigid retaining wall subjected to surcharge loading, Geotextile and Geomembranes. 50(4) (2022)

DOI: 10.1016/j.geotexmem.2022.05.002

[16] L.A. Raj, M. Muttharam, Effect of different compressible inclusions on lateral earth pressure reduction in rigid retaining wall, In book: Earth Retaining Structures and Stability Analysis, Proceedings of the Indian Geotechnical Conference 6 (2023)

DOI: 10.1007/978-981-19-7245-4_40

[17] P. Yu, Y. Liu, Analysis of active earth pressure behind rigid retaining wall considering curved slip surface, Geotechnical and Geological Engineering. (2023). http://dx.doi.org/

DOI: 10.1007/s10706-023-02567-6

[18] V. Singh, S. Bano, R. Kumar, V.K. Tripathi, A. Verma, Numerical study on the reduction of dynamic lateral earth pressure on retaining wall using waste tyre, IOP Conference Series Materials Science and Engineering. 1273(1): 012017 (2023)

DOI: 10.1088/1757-899X/1273/1/012017

[19] Y.E. Ibrahim, M. Nabil, Earth pressure reduction on retaining wall using EPS geofoam, Magazine of Civil Engineering. 99(7) (2020)

[20] R. Mustafa, Numerical modeling of gravity retaining wall using EPS geofoam under seismic condition, Asian J Civ Eng. (2023)

DOI: 10.1007/s42107-023-00926-5

[21] V.B. Chauhan, D. Murty, Active earth pressure on retaining wall with a relief shelf: A novel analytical method, Innovative Infrastructure Solutions. (2022)

DOI: 10.1007/s41062-021-00690-y

[22] Y.A. Elhady, E.A. Osman, Reduction of lateral earth pressure on cantilever retaining wall using geofoam (EPS) material, Journal of Advanced Engineering Trends. 42(2) (2023) 189-198

DOI: 10.21608/jaet.2022.113116.1137

[23] G. Lee, Y. Park, Earth pressure reduction effect of earth retaining walls composed of concrete piles and steel piles, Korean Society of Hazard Mitigation. 22(2) (2022) 153-162

DOI: 10.9798/KOSHAM.2022.22.2.153

[24] M.I. Khan, M. Meguid, Evaluating the role of geofoam properties in reducing lateral loads on retaining walls: A numerical study, Sustainability. 13(9) (2021). http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ su13094754

DOI: 10.3390/su13094754

[25] S.M. Ahmed, T. Sorour, M. Saad, Reduction of earth pressure for non-yielding retaining walls using EPS Geofoam, International Journal of Scientific and Engineering Research. 11(1) (2020) 1075-1083.

[26] X. Yang, Performance of geofoam included nailed-walls in dynamic condition, Geotechnical and Geological Engineering. (2023)

DOI: 10.1007/s10706-023-02656-6

[27] V. Singh, V.B. Chauhan, Reduction of dynamic lateral earth pressure on retaining wall using waste tyre, Indian Conference on Geotechnical and Geo-environmental Engineering. (2019).

[28] R. Brinkgreve, W. Broere, PLAXIS 2D Reference Manual 2015, Plaxis bv: Delft, The Netherlands. (2015).

[29] T.N. Dave, Performance evaluation of EPS geofoam inclusion to reduce static and dynamic earth pressures on rigid retaining walls, Ph.D Thesis, IIT Bombay, India (2013).