Implications of the Global Race to Net-Zero by 2050 for the Strategic Fleet of Coal-Fired Power Plants in SADC

Article Preview

Abstract:

This paper discusses the coal-fired power plants (CFPPs) in the Southern African Development Community (SADC), in the context of the net-zero by 2050 initiative. It describes recent global climate change responses impacting the operation of CFPPs, and the medium-to-long term prospects for coal power. The paper then discusses the motivators and strategies for sustaining the operations of CFPPs in SADC, and why the international community has to let countries in the region and other small developing nations, transition to renewable energies at a more measured pace. It also offers actionable insights on sustainable financing options for upgrading the region’s CFPPs and just energy transitions. Following a balanced assessment of the facts and broad issues discussed herein including the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals 7, 10, 13, and 17; the paper concludes that most of the CFPPs in SADC are likely to remain operational way beyond the phase out deadlines despite lacking emissions abatement technologies. The pressing and burgeoning need for electricity and the huge coal reserves in the region are the determinants, rather than international norms or political correctness. However, no development institution or major country will finance any new CFPP projects in SADC, but renewable energy projects instead. Thus, national energy policymakers and power utilities in the region are recommended to revise the current energy policies to include renewable energy expansion and obliterate any mentions of proposed or planned CFPPs. SADC governments need to engage in public dissemination campaigns about the impending energy transition implications for all citizens and map out pragmatic cushioning strategies. Concurrently, they need to support innovations and entrepreneurship in renewable energies and work on improving national creditworthiness scores, to attract climate finance.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

97-115

Citation:

Online since:

July 2024

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2024 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] UN Climate Change 2022 United Nations Climate Change Annual Report (2021)

Google Scholar

[2] IEA 2021 Net Zero by 2050: A Roadmap for the Global Energy Sector Int. Energy Agency 224

Google Scholar

[3] Gür T M 2021 Carbon Dioxide Emissions, Capture, Storage and Utilization: Review of Materials, Processes and Technologies Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 89 100965

DOI: 10.1016/j.pecs.2021.100965

Google Scholar

[4] Erickson L E and Brase G 2019 Paris Agreement on Climate Change Reducing Greenh. Gas Emiss. Improv. Air Qual. 11–22

DOI: 10.1201/9781351116589-2

Google Scholar

[5] Anon 2022 Fostering Effective Energy Transition 2022 Edition

Google Scholar

[6] Welsby D, Price J, Pye S and Ekins P 2021 Unextractable fossil fuels in a 1.5 °C world Nature 597 230–4

DOI: 10.1038/s41586-021-03821-8

Google Scholar

[7] International Energy Agency 2023 Net Zero Roadmap : A Global Pathway to Keep the 1.5 °C Goal in Reach - 2023 Update

Google Scholar

[8] Shine I and Geldard R 2023 Is 2023 going to be the hottest year on record? Agenda Wkly.

Google Scholar

[9] Ritchie H, Roser M and Rosado P 2020 CO₂ and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Our World Data

Google Scholar

[10] Steckel J C, Edenhofer O and Jakob M 2015 Drivers for the renaissance of coal Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 112 E3775–81

DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1422722112

Google Scholar

[11] Anon United Nations Net Zero Coalition

Google Scholar

[12] Alvarez C F, McNamara K and Saive G 2021 Phasing Out Unabated Coal Current status and three case studies (Paris)

DOI: 10.1787/d6c4a08d-en

Google Scholar

[13] REN21 2021 Renewables in Cities 2019 Status Report 202

Google Scholar

[14] Huang Y, Kuldasheva Z, Bobojanov S, Djalilov B, Salahodjaev R and Abbas S 2023 Exploring the links between fossil fuel energy consumption, industrial value-added, and carbon emissions in G20 countries Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 30 10854–66

DOI: 10.1007/s11356-022-22605-9

Google Scholar

[15] UK COP Presidency 2021 COP26 : The Glasgow Climate Pact

Google Scholar

[16] Spath P L, Mann M K and Kerr D R 1999 Life Cycle Assessment of Coal-fired Power Production

DOI: 10.2172/12100

Google Scholar

[17] Climate Watch 2022 World Greenhouse Gas Emissions in (2019)

Google Scholar

[18] Fennell P S 2019 Comparative Energy Analysis of Renewable Electricity and Carbon Capture and Storage Joule 3 1406–8

DOI: 10.1016/j.joule.2019.06.003

Google Scholar

[19] UNFCCC 2021 NDC Synthesis report 2021 English 4 1–8

Google Scholar

[20] Goldthau A, Eicke L and Weko S 2020 The Global Energy Transition and the Global South Andreas Lecture Notes in Energy vol 73, ed M Hafner and S Tagliapietra (Springer) p.319–40

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-39066-2_14

Google Scholar

[21] Xu Y, Yang K, Zhou J and Zhao G 2020 Coal-Biomass Co-Firing Power Generation Technology : Current Status , Challenges and Policy Implications

DOI: 10.3390/su12093692

Google Scholar

[22] Tang Z, Ma S, Ding J, Wang Y and Zheng S 2013 Current Status and Prospect of Fly Ash Utilization in China 2013 world coal ash 22–7

Google Scholar

[23] Querol X, Alastuey A, Chaves A, Spiro B, Felicia Plana and Lopez-Soler A 2000 Sources of natural and anthropogenic sulphur around the Teruel power station, NE Spain. Inferences from sulphur isotope geochemistry Atmos. Environ. 34

DOI: 10.1016/s1352-2310(99)00188-0

Google Scholar

[24] Chen S, Li Y and Yao Q 2018 The health costs of the industrial leap forward in China: Evidence from the sulfur dioxide emissions of coal-fired power stations China Econ. Rev. 49

DOI: 10.1016/j.chieco.2018.01.004

Google Scholar

[25] Cohen D D, Crawford J, Stelcer E and Bac V T 2010 Long range transport of fine particle windblown soils and coal fired power station emissions into Hanoi between 2001 to 2008 Atmos. Environ. 44

DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.06.047

Google Scholar

[26] Hou S S, Chiang C Y and Lin T H 2020 Oxy-fuel combustion characteristics of pulverized coal under O2/recirculated flue gas atmospheres Appl. Sci. 10

DOI: 10.3390/app10041362

Google Scholar

[27] Myllyvirta L 2021 Eskom is now the world's most polluting power company

Google Scholar

[28] Zerizghi T, Guo Q, Zhao C and Okoli C P 2022 Sulfur, lead, and mercury characteristics in South Africa coals and emissions from the coal-fired power plants Environ. Earth Sci. 81

DOI: 10.1007/s12665-021-10046-5

Google Scholar

[29] United Nations Climate Change 2023 For a livable climate : Net-zero commitments must be backed by credible action

Google Scholar

[30] Lin C K, Lin R T, Chen T, Zigler C, Wei Y and Christiani D C 2019 A global perspective on coal-fired power plants and burden of lung cancer Environ. Heal. A Glob. Access Sci. Source 18

DOI: 10.1186/s12940-019-0448-8

Google Scholar

[31] Howard D B, Thé J, Soria R, Fann N, Schaeffer R and Saphores J D M 2019 Health benefits and control costs of tightening particulate matter emissions standards for coal power plants - The case of Northeast Brazil Environ. Int. 124

DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2019.01.029

Google Scholar

[32] Kopas J, York E, Jin X, Harish S P, Kennedy R, Shen S V and Urpelainen J 2020 Environmental Justice in India: Incidence of Air Pollution from Coal-Fired Power Plants Ecol. Econ. 176

DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2020.106711

Google Scholar

[33] Cropper M L, Guttikunda S, Jawahar P, Lazri Z, Malik K, Song X P and Yao X 2019 Applying Benefit-Cost Analysis to Air Pollution Control in the Indian Power Sector J. Benefit-Cost Anal.

DOI: 10.1017/bca.2018.27

Google Scholar

[34] Zhang C H, Sears L, Myers J V., Brock G N, Sears C G and Zierold K M 2021 Proximity to coal-fired power plants and neurobehavioral symptoms in children J. Expo. Sci. Environ. Epidemiol.

DOI: 10.1038/s41370-021-00369-7

Google Scholar

[35] Clark R, Zucker N and Urpelainen J 2019 Political Institutions and Pollution: Evidence from Coal-Fired Power Generation Rev. Policy Res. 36

DOI: 10.1111/ropr.12356

Google Scholar

[36] Cairncross E, Dalvie A, Euripidou R, Irlam J and Naidoo R N 2018 Climate Change, Air Pollution and Health in South Africa Springer Climate

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-61346-8_20

Google Scholar

[37] Sahu S K, Tiwari M, Bhangare R C and Pandit G G 2014 Enrichment and particle size dependence of polonium and other naturally occurring radionuclides in coal ash J. Environ. Radioact. 138

DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2014.04.010

Google Scholar

[38] Baig K S and M Y 2017 Coal Fired Power Plants: Emission Problems and Controlling Techniques J. Earth Sci. Clim. Change 08

DOI: 10.4172/2157-7617.1000404

Google Scholar

[39] Moretti A L, Jones C S, Wilcox B & and Asia P-G 2012 Advanced Emissions Control Technologies for Coal-Fired Power Plants

Google Scholar

[40] SADC 2022 Member States

Google Scholar

[41] SADC 1998 Declaration and Treaty of the Southern African Development Community

Google Scholar

[42] SADC 2015 SADC Climate Change Strategy and Action Plan

Google Scholar

[43] SADC 2001 Regional Indicative Strategic Development Plan

Google Scholar

[44] SADC 1996 Protocol on Energy in the Southern African Development Community (SADC) Region

Google Scholar

[45] Brey Z, Sokhulu N and Stern M 2015 SADC Trade and Regulations in Electricity and Related Services

Google Scholar

[46] SADC 2020 Southern African Development Community Vision 2050 Virtual Econ. 2 3–12

Google Scholar

[47] van der Zwaan B 2005 Will coal depart or will it continue to dominate global power production during the 21st century? Clim. Policy 5 445–53

DOI: 10.1080/14693062.2005.9685569

Google Scholar

[48] Jane Wagner, Malumbazo N and Falcon R M S 2018 Southern African Coals and Carbons: Definitions and Applications of Organic Petrology (Struik Nature)

Google Scholar

[49] Hancox P J and Götz A E 2014 South Africa's coalfields - A 2014 perspective Int. J. Coal Geol. 132 170–254

DOI: 10.1016/j.coal.2014.06.019

Google Scholar

[50] Egli F, Agutu C, Steffen B and Schmidt T S 2023 The cost of electrifying all households in 40 Sub-Saharan African countries by 2030 Nat. Commun. 14

DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-40612-3

Google Scholar

[51] CarbonBrief Mapped: The world's coal power plants in (2020)

Google Scholar

[52] Sguazzin A 2023 Eskom's pollution disaster laid bare TECHCENTRAL

Google Scholar

[53] Wu Y, Polvani L M and Seager R 2013 The importance of the montreal protocol in protecting Earth's hydroclimate J. Clim. 26 4049–68

DOI: 10.1175/jcli-d-12-00675.1

Google Scholar

[54] Anon 1989 Montreal protocol on substances that deplete the Ozone layer final act 1987 J. Environ. Law 1 128–36

DOI: 10.1093/jel/1.1.128

Google Scholar

[55] Gerden T 2018 The adoption of the kyoto protocol of t he united nations framework convention on climate change Contrib. to Contemp. Hist. 58

DOI: 10.51663/pnz.58.2.07

Google Scholar

[56] O'Brien S 2009 Greenhouse effect and global warming Introd. to Environ. Manag. 145–56

Google Scholar

[57] Anon NDC Synthesis Report | UNFCCC

Google Scholar

[58] DEA 2015 South Africa ' s Intended Nationally Determined Contribution (INDC) Unfccc 1

Google Scholar

[59] Hosseini S E 2022 Transition away from fossil fuels toward renewables : lessons from Russia-Ukraine crisis 01 2–5

DOI: 10.55670/fpll.fuen.1.1.8

Google Scholar

[60] UN COP26 2021 COP26 Goals - UN Climate Change Conference (COP26) at the SEC – Glasgow (2021)

DOI: 10.1163/9789004322714_cclc_2021-0261-882

Google Scholar

[61] UNFCCC 2021 COP 26 Glasgow Climate Pact Advance unedited version Decision Cop26 1–8

Google Scholar

[62] Anon 2022 G7 countries pledge to end fossil-fuel financing abroad TRT WorldWorld

Google Scholar

[63] Martin N 2022 G7 agrees 'concrete steps' to phase out coal Dtsch. Well

Google Scholar

[64] Anon Zimbabwe's energy policy still favouring coal over renewables

Google Scholar

[65] UNDP 2023 Brief on COP27 Outcomes and Roadmap to COP28

Google Scholar

[66] UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs 2022 COP27: What you need to know about this year's big UN Climate Conference UN News

Google Scholar

[67] Gawel A and Cooper N 2022 What did COP27 accomplish and what actions can we expect as a result? World Econ. Forum

Google Scholar

[68] UNFCCC 2023 Outcome of the first global stocktake. Draft decision -/CMA.5. Proposal by the President vol 24993

Google Scholar

[69] Raptis C E, Oberschelp C and Pfister S 2020 The greenhouse gas emissions, water consumption, and heat emissions of global steam-electric power production: A generating unit level analysis and database Environ. Res. Lett. 15

DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/aba6ac

Google Scholar

[70] Kramer K 2022 Making the Leap: The need for Just Energy Transition Partnerships to support leapfrogging fossil gas to a clean renewable energy future

Google Scholar

[71] Samaras C, Drezner J A, Willis H H and Bloom E 2020 Characterizing the U.S. Industrial Base for Coal-Powered Electricity

Google Scholar

[72] Campbell R J 2015 Increasing the efficiency of existing coal-fired power plants Coal-Fired Power Plants Effic. Improv. Options 77–111

DOI: 10.2172/1515252

Google Scholar

[73] Deloitte 2019 Assessing the flexibility of coal-fired power plants for the integration of renewable energy in Germany

Google Scholar

[74] Henderson C 2013 Upgrading and efficiency improvement in coal-fired power plants

Google Scholar

[75] Smith T 2022 Komati goes dark for real as Eskom decommissions power station ESI Africa

Google Scholar

[76] Smith T 2023 Repowering and repurposing coal power stations in South Africa ESI Africa

Google Scholar

[77] Hako N 2022 World Bank lends a hand to repurpose Komati Power Station ESI Africa

Google Scholar

[78] Ramachandran V and Baker A 2022 Let Them Eat Carbon CGD Policy Pap. 263. Washington, DC Cent. Glob. Dev.

Google Scholar

[79] TWAS 2008 Sustainable energy for developing countries SAPI EN. S. Surv. Perspect. Integr. Environ. Soc. 2.1 1–48

Google Scholar

[80] Sah A, Lovering J, Maseli O and Saxena A 2018 Atoms for Africa: Is There a Future for Civil Nuclear Energy in Sub-Saharan Africa? CGD Policy Paper 124. Washington, DC.

Google Scholar

[81] Seebauer M, Pinkwart A, Schwarz B and Hartz C 2019 Greenhouse Gas Assessment of Bush Control and Biomass Utilization in Namibia Greenhouse Gas Assessment of Bush Control and Biomass Utilization in Namibia

Google Scholar

[82] Muteyauli P and Chunga R S 2016 Republic of Namibia National GHG Inventory Report NIR 2 2000 – 2012 vol (1997)

Google Scholar

[83] IEA 2023 Number of people without access to electricity by region, 2010-2023

Google Scholar

[84] IQAir 2021 2021 World Air Quality Report

Google Scholar

[85] United Nations 2016 Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for sustainable development

Google Scholar

[86] African Development Bank 2022 Africa in search of a just energy transition

Google Scholar

[87] Attia B and Bazilian M 2022 Why banning financing for fossil fuel projects in Africa isn't a climate solution Conversat.

Google Scholar

[88] Ramachandran V 2021 Blanket bans on fossil-fuel funds will entrench poverty Nature 592 489

DOI: 10.1038/d41586-021-01020-z

Google Scholar

[89] Diffenbaugh N S and Burke M 2019 Global warming has increased global economic inequality Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 116 9808–13

DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1816020116

Google Scholar

[90] Boyle A 2020 Climate Change, Sustainable Development, and Human Rights Sustainable Development Goals and Human Rights ed M Kalternborn, H Kuhn and M Krajewski (Springer Berlin Heidelberg) p.171–87

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-30469-0_10

Google Scholar

[91] Tasrif A Why accelerating a just energy transition is the only option | World Economic Forum

Google Scholar

[92] Möst D, Schreiber S, Herbst A, Jakob M and Poganietz A M W 2021 The Future European Energy System

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-60914-6

Google Scholar

[93] Jacobson M Z, Delucchi M A, Bauer Z A F, Goodman S C, Chapman W E, Cameron M A, Bozonnat C, Chobadi L, Clonts H A, Enevoldsen P, Erwin J R, Fobi S N, Goldstrom O K, Hennessy E M, Liu J, Lo J, Meyer C B, Morris S B, Moy K R, O'Neill P L, Petkov I, Redfern S, Schucker R, Sontag M A, Wang J, Weiner E and Yachanin A S 2017 100% Clean and Renewable Wind, Water, and Sunlight All-Sector Energy Roadmaps for 139 Countries of the World Joule 1 108–21

DOI: 10.1016/j.joule.2017.07.005

Google Scholar

[94] Weber G and Cabras I 2021 Environmental Justice and Just Transition in the EU's Sustainability Policies in Third Countries: The Case of Colombia Int. Spect. 56 119–37

DOI: 10.1080/03932729.2021.1946262

Google Scholar

[95] Power M, Newell P, Baker L, Bulkeley H, Kirshner J and Smith A 2016 The political economy of energy transitions in Mozambique and South Africa: The role of the Rising Powers Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 17 10–9

DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2016.03.007

Google Scholar

[96] Elsevier's Analytical Services 2021 Pathways to Net Zero: The Impact of Clean Energy Research

Google Scholar

[97] World Population Review Debt to GDP Ratio by Country (2022)

Google Scholar

[98] Elkhoury M 2008 CREDIT RATING AGENCIES AND THEIR POTENTIAL IMPACT ON DEVELOPING COUNTRIES UNCTAD Discuss. Pap.

Google Scholar

[99] Santos K Corporate credit ratings: a quick guide Treasurer's Companion

Google Scholar

[100] Anon Credit Rating - Countries - List Trading Econ.

Google Scholar

[101] African Union Development Agency 2023 The Grand Inga Hydropower Project

Google Scholar

[102] International Rivers 2022 Grand Inga Hydroelectric Project: An Overview

Google Scholar

[103] United Nations 2015 Addis Ababa Action Agenda of the Third International Conference on Financing for Development

Google Scholar

[104] Baldwin K 2017 FactCheck Q&A: is coal still cheaper than renewables as an energy source? Conversat.

DOI: 10.2307/jj.5993280.48

Google Scholar

[105] Banktrack 2021 Medupi coal power plant - South Africa

Google Scholar

[106] Irlam P 2006 Upgrading of a boiler feed pump in a UK coal fired power station Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Fluid Machinery Group - Ninth European Fluid Machinery Congress: Applying the Latest Technology to New and Existing Process Equipment vol (2006)

DOI: 10.1016/s0262-1762(06)70880-x

Google Scholar

[107] Liao S, Li Z, Li G, Wang J and Wu X 2015 Modeling and optimization of the medium-term units commitment of thermal power Energies 8

DOI: 10.3390/en81112345

Google Scholar

[108] Agora Energiewende 2017 Flexibility in thermal power plants with a focus on existing coal-fired power plants

Google Scholar

[109] Liu W H, Ho W S, Lee M Y, Hashim H, Lim J S, Hoo P Y and Klemeš J J 2018 Optimising thermal power plant with generation flexibility and heat rate factor Chem. Eng. Trans. 70 1981–6

Google Scholar

[110] Development Bank of Southern Africa 2017 Natural Gas in Southern Africa

Google Scholar

[111] Longwell J P, Rubin E S and Wilson J 1995 Coal: Energy for the future Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 21 269–360

Google Scholar

[112] Wang Q and Song X 2021 Why do China and India burn 60% of the world's coal? A decomposition analysis from a global perspective Energy 227 120389

DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2021.120389

Google Scholar

[113] National Business Initiative 2022 Just Transition and Climate Pathways Study for South Africa: The Role of Gas in South Africa's Path to Net-Zero

Google Scholar

[114] HAUPT G, ZIMMERMANN G, PRUSCHEK R and OELJEKLAUS G 2003 IGCC — The Best Choice for Producing Low-CO2 Power Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies - 6th International Conference

DOI: 10.1016/b978-008044276-1/50168-9

Google Scholar

[115] Rao A B and Kumar P 2014 Cost implications of carbon capture and storage for the coal power plants in India Energy Procedia 54 431–8

DOI: 10.1016/j.egypro.2014.07.285

Google Scholar

[116] Cuéllar-Franca R M and Azapagic A 2015 Carbon capture, storage and utilisation technologies: A critical analysis and comparison of their life cycle environmental impacts J. CO2 Util. 9 82–102

DOI: 10.1016/j.jcou.2014.12.001

Google Scholar

[117] International Energy Agency 2021 Global Energy Review : CO2 Emissions in 2021 Global emissions rebound sharply to highest ever level

Google Scholar

[118] Ping Z, Benelli G, Jiutian Z, Lin G, Shujuan W, Jinyi W, Xian Z and Lu Z 2014 The application of CCS technology in china: Lesson from the sino-italy collaboration on coal fired power plants Energy Procedia vol 63

DOI: 10.1016/j.egypro.2014.11.847

Google Scholar

[119] Johnson N, Krey V, McCollum D L, Rao S, Riahi K and Rogelj J 2015 Stranded on a low-carbon planet: Implications of climate policy for the phase-out of coal-based power plants Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 90 89–102

DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2014.02.028

Google Scholar

[120] Doyle A 2022 Energy: Coal to Nuclear Chem. Eng.

Google Scholar