The Industry-University-Research Cooperation of Chinese Medium and Small Technological Enterprises Taking Scientific Papers Supported by the TIF between 2000-2010 for Sample

Taking 2062 scientific papers supported by the TIF between 2000-2010 for sample, we define variables and coding for those papers’ external characteristics, and analyze the industry-university-research cooperation of MSTEs. The results show that: through the use of external resources, MSTEs completed the innovation projects, IURC are active; the papers jointly completed mainly belong to engineering technology and basic research level; the universities are the most important external intellectual resources of MSTEs; most MSTEs cooperates with universities and research institutions in the field of engineering technology; MSTEs in Jiangsu, Beijing, Sichuan, Shanghai, Guangdong are more likely to cooperate with universities or research institutions in other provinces. At last, we propose some suggestions.

You have full access to the following eBook

Read eBook

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Engineering Forum (Volumes 6-7)

Pages:

149-155

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AEF.6-7.149

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

September 2012

Authors:

Jian Feng Zhu

Keywords:

Industry-University-Research Cooperation, Medium Technological Enterprises, Scientific Papers, Small Technological Enterprises, Technological Innovation Fund

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Permissions:

Creative Commons CC BY 4.0

Citation:

References

[1] Bao Guoqiang. SMEs' innovation has become an important source of economic growth,. Shanghai Business, 2006, （9）: 57-59.

Google Scholar

[2] Wan Gang. The Review and Outlook of Medium and Small Technological Enterprises Technology Innovation Fund,. Technology and Law, 2010, （1）: 1-5.

Google Scholar

[3] Wu Jie, Shi Qinfen. Knowledge Innovation and Transfer: A Study on Output Efficiency of Academic Papers in Colleges and Universities,. Science of Science and Management of S. & T. , 2008, （3）: 95-98.

Google Scholar

[4] Van Dierdonck, R., Debackere, K. Academic entrepreneurship at Belgian universities, R&D Management, 1988, Vol. 18 No. 4, pp.341-53.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9310.1988.tb00609.x

Google Scholar

[5] Hall, B.H., Link, A.N., Scott, J.T. Barriers inhibiting industry from partnering with universities: evidence from the advanced technology program, Journal of Technology Transfer, 2001, Vol. 26 No. 1/2, pp.87-97.

Google Scholar

[6] Cyert, R.M., Goodman, P.S. Creating effective university-industry alliances: an organizational learning perspective, Organizational Dynamics, 1997, Vol. 25 No. 4, pp.45-57.

DOI: 10.1016/s0090-2616(97)90036-x

Google Scholar

[7] David Blumenthal. Academic-Industry Relationships in the Life Sciences: Extent, Consequences, and Management, Journal of the American Medical Association (1992).

Google Scholar

[8] Douglas A. Irwin, Peter J. Klenow. Sematech；purpose and performance, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the Sciences of the United States of America, 1996, Vol. 93 No. 23, pp.12739-12742.

DOI: 10.1073/pnas.93.23.12739

Google Scholar

[9] Santoro, M. & Chakrabarti, A. Corporate strategic objectives for establishing relationships with university research centers,. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 2001, Vol. 48, No. 2, pp.157-163.

DOI: 10.1109/17.922475

Google Scholar

[10] John Corbin. Social Class and Parton-Clientage in Andalusia: Some Problems of Comparing Ethnographies, Anthropological Quarterly, 1979, vol. 52, No. 2, pp.99-114.

DOI: 10.2307/3317260

Google Scholar

[11] Mariko Sakakibara. Heterogeneity of Firm Capabilities and Cooperative Research and Development: An Empirical Examination of Motives, Strategic Management Journal, 1997, vol. 18, pp.143-146.

DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0266(199707)18:1+<143::aid-smj927>3.3.co;2-p

Google Scholar