The Industry-University-Research Cooperation of Chinese Medium and Small Technological Enterprises Taking Scientific Papers Supported by the TIF between 2000-2010 for Sample

Abstract:

Taking 2062 scientific papers supported by the TIF between 2000-2010 for sample, we define variables and coding for those papers’ external characteristics, and analyze the industry-university-research cooperation of MSTEs. The results show that: through the use of external resources, MSTEs completed the innovation projects, IURC are active; the papers jointly completed mainly belong to engineering technology and basic research level; the universities are the most important external intellectual resources of MSTEs; most MSTEs cooperates with universities and research institutions in the field of engineering technology; MSTEs in Jiangsu, Beijing, Sichuan, Shanghai, Guangdong are more likely to cooperate with universities or research institutions in other provinces. At last, we propose some suggestions.

• Periodical: Advanced Engineering Forum (Volumes 6-7)
• Pages: 149-155
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AEF.6-7.149
• Online since: September 2012
• Authors: Jian Feng Zhu
• Keywords: Industry-University-Research Cooperation, Medium Technological Enterprises, Scientific Papers, Small Technological Enterprises, Technological Innovation Fund

References

[1] Bao Guoqiang. SMEs' innovation has become an important source of economic growth,. Shanghai Business, 2006, （9）: 57-59.

[2] Wan Gang. The Review and Outlook of Medium and Small Technological Enterprises Technology Innovation Fund,. Technology and Law, 2010, （1）: 1-5.

[3] Wu Jie, Shi Qinfen. Knowledge Innovation and Transfer: A Study on Output Efficiency of Academic Papers in Colleges and Universities,. Science of Science and Management of S. & T. , 2008, （3）: 95-98.

[4] Van Dierdonck, R., Debackere, K. Academic entrepreneurship at Belgian universities, R&D Management, 1988, Vol. 18 No. 4, pp.341-53.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9310.1988.tb00609.x

[5] Hall, B.H., Link, A.N., Scott, J.T. Barriers inhibiting industry from partnering with universities: evidence from the advanced technology program, Journal of Technology Transfer, 2001, Vol. 26 No. 1/2, pp.87-97.

[6] Cyert, R.M., Goodman, P.S. Creating effective university-industry alliances: an organizational learning perspective, Organizational Dynamics, 1997, Vol. 25 No. 4, pp.45-57.

DOI: 10.1016/s0090-2616(97)90036-x

[7] David Blumenthal. Academic-Industry Relationships in the Life Sciences: Extent, Consequences, and Management, Journal of the American Medical Association (1992).

[8] Douglas A. Irwin, Peter J. Klenow. Sematech；purpose and performance, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the Sciences of the United States of America, 1996, Vol. 93 No. 23, pp.12739-12742.

DOI: 10.1073/pnas.93.23.12739

[9] Santoro, M. & Chakrabarti, A. Corporate strategic objectives for establishing relationships with university research centers,. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 2001, Vol. 48, No. 2, pp.157-163.

DOI: 10.1109/17.922475

[10] John Corbin. Social Class and Parton-Clientage in Andalusia: Some Problems of Comparing Ethnographies, Anthropological Quarterly, 1979, vol. 52, No. 2, pp.99-114.

DOI: 10.2307/3317260

[11] Mariko Sakakibara. Heterogeneity of Firm Capabilities and Cooperative Research and Development: An Empirical Examination of Motives, Strategic Management Journal, 1997, vol. 18, pp.143-146.

DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0266(199707)18:1+<143::aid-smj927>3.3.co;2-p