Performance Evaluation of PCD 1300 and 1500 Grade Inserts on Turning A356 Alloy with 20% Reinforcement of SiC Particles

Article Preview

Abstract:

Aluminum silicon carbide Metal Matrix Composites (Al-MMC) are widely used in aeronautical and automobile industries due to their excellent mechanical and physical properties. However the harder reinforcement particles make machining difficult. Tool wear occurs more quickly and reduces the life of the tool. This paper presents the experimental investigation on turning A356 matrix metal reinforced with 20 % by weight of Silicon carbide (SiC) particles, fabricated in house by stir casting. Fabricated samples were turned on medium duty lathe with Poly crystalline Diamond (PCD) inserts of 1300 and 1500 grade exposed to various cutting conditions. Parameters such as power consumed by main spindle, machined surface roughness and tool wear are studied. Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) images support the result. It is evident that, surface finish, and power consumed are good for 1500 grade when compared with 1300 grade at higher cutting speed and tool wear is strongly dependent on the abrasive hard reinforcement particles.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

1855-1861

Citation:

Online since:

October 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Tomac N and Tonnessen K (1992), Machinability of particulate Aluminum Metal Matrix Composites, . Annals of the CIRP, Vol. 41, pp.55-58.

DOI: 10.1016/s0007-8506(07)61151-2

Google Scholar

[2] Weinert. K (1993), A consideration of tool wear mechanism when machining metal matrix composites (MMC), CIRP Ann, Vol. 42, pp.95-98.

DOI: 10.1016/s0007-8506(07)62400-7

Google Scholar

[3] Lane G, (1992) , The effect of different reinforcement on PCD tool life for aluminium composites, Proceedings of the Machining of Composites Materials Symposium, ASM Materials Week, Chicago, IL, pp.3-15.

Google Scholar

[4] Manna A and Bhattacharyya B (2003), Study on Different Tooling Systems during Turning for Effective Machining of Al-SiC MMC, Journal of Production Engineering Institution of Engineers, Vol. 83, pp.46-50.

Google Scholar

[5] Muthukrishnan N and Paulo Davim J (2009), Optimization of machining parameters of Al-SiC –MMC with ANOVA and ANN analysis, J. Mater. Process Techno, Vol. 209. pp.225-232.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2008.01.041

Google Scholar

[6] Muthukrishnan N, Murugan. M, and Prahlada Rao K (2008), Machinability issues in turning of Al-SiC (10p) metal matrix composites, Int J Adv Manuf. Technol, Vol. 38. pp.21-218.

DOI: 10.1007/s00170-007-1220-8

Google Scholar

[7] Paulo Davim. J, and Montiro Baptista A (2000), Relationship between cutting force and PCD cutting tool wear in machining silicon carbide reinforced aluminum, J. Mater. Process Technol, Vol. 103, pp.417-423.

DOI: 10.1016/s0924-0136(00)00495-7

Google Scholar

[8] Pramanik A , Zhang LC and Arsecularatne JA (2006), Prediction of cutting forces in machining of metal matrix composites, International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture, Vol. 46 p.1795 – 1803.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2005.11.012

Google Scholar

[9] Heat P (1991), Cutting composites with PCD, Comp. Manuf. Vol. 7, pp.1-3.

Google Scholar

[10] Andrewes C, Feng H, and Lau W (2005), Machining of an aluminum/SiC composite using diamond inserts, J. Mater. Process. Techno, Vol. 102, pp.25-29.

DOI: 10.1016/s0924-0136(00)00425-8

Google Scholar

[11] Caroline J. E, Andrews, His-yung Feng, and Lau W. M (2000), Machining of an aluminum - SiC composite using diamond inserts, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, Vol. 102, pp.25-29.

DOI: 10.1016/s0924-0136(00)00425-8

Google Scholar

[12] G.A. Chadwick G. A and Heat P (1990), Machining metal matrix composites, Met. Mater. Vol. 6, pp.73-76.

Google Scholar

[13] T. Clyne T and Withers P (1995).

Google Scholar