Utilization of Advanced Manufacturing Technologies in an Indian Manufacturing Enterprise

Article Preview

Abstract:

In the present turbulent times, survival and success of any organization increasingly depends on effective use of resources available in any organization. The present study has been carried out to assess the utilization of new technologies in the manufacturing organization. A feasibility study has been carried out to find out the utilization level of different technologies for strategic success. The study has been conducted by considering the following aspects:- Utilization of different operations with respect to time. Utilization of machines by comparing the costs of automatic machines with conventional machines. It has been observed that the utilization level of all the sections is more than 70% with respect to time. The research has been carried out using flexible systems methodology. SAP-LAP (Situation Actor Process-Learning Action Performance) is a holistic framework that blends hard systems and soft systems paradigms. For this reason, the enterprises aim for improving the utilization level of existing resources.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

2210-2216

Citation:

Online since:

October 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] S.E. Costa, K.W. Platts and A. Fleury, Strategic selection of advanced manufacturing technologies (AMT), based on the manufacturing vision, International Journal of Computer Applications in Technology, Vol. 27, No. 1, 2006, pp.12-23.

DOI: 10.1504/ijcat.2006.010985

Google Scholar

[2] Q. Zhang, M.A. Vonderembse and M. Cao, Achieving flexible manufacturing competence: the roles of advanced manufacturing technology and operations improvement practices, International Journal of Operations and Production Management, Vol. 26, No. 6, 2006, pp.580-599.

DOI: 10.1108/01443570610666957

Google Scholar

[3] L. Raymond and A.M. Croteau, Enabling the strategic development of SMEs through advanced manufacturing systems: a configurational perspective, Industrial Management and Data Systems, Vol. 106, No. 7, 2006, pp.1012-1032.

DOI: 10.1108/02635570610688904

Google Scholar

[4] N. Alp, B. Alp and Y. Omurtag, Technology acquisition and utilization model (TAUM), Computers and Industrial Engineering, Vol. 33, Nos. 1-2, 1997, pp.7-10.

DOI: 10.1016/s0360-8352(97)00028-4

Google Scholar

[5] R. Narain, R.C. Yadav and J. Sarkis, Investment justification of advanced manufacturing technology: a review, International Journal of Services and Operations Management, Vol. 3, No. 1, 2007, pp.41-73.

DOI: 10.1504/ijsom.2007.011461

Google Scholar

[6] Sushil., Flexible systems management: an evolving paradigm, Systems Research and Behavioural Science, Vol. 14, No. 4, 1997, pp.259-269.

Google Scholar

[7] C.A. M Monge,. S.S. Rao, M.E. Gonzalez and A.S. Sohal, Performance measurement of AMT: a cross regional study, Benchmarking: An International Journal, Vol. 13, Nos. 1-2, 2006, pp.135-146.

DOI: 10.1108/14635770610644637

Google Scholar

[8] G.S. Dangayach and S.G. Deshmukh, Advanced manufacturing technology implementation-evidence from Indian SMEs, Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, Vol. 16, No. 5, 2005, pp.483-496.

DOI: 10.1108/17410380510600473

Google Scholar

[9] T. Saiki, Y. Akano, C. Watanabe and Y. Tou, A new dimension of potential resources in innovation: a wider scope of patent claims can lead to new functionality development, Technovation, Vol. 26, No. 7, 2006, pp.796-806.

DOI: 10.1016/j.technovation.2005.06.002

Google Scholar

[10] C.R. Isa and S.Y. Foong, Adoption of advanced manufacturing technology (AMT) and management accounting practices: the case of manufacturing firms in Malaysia, World Review of Science, Technology and Sustainable Development, Vol. 2, No. 1, 20005, pp.35-48.

DOI: 10.1504/wrstsd.2005.006726

Google Scholar

[11] A.S. Sohal, J. Sarros, R. Schroder, and P. O'neill, Adoption framework for advanced manufacturing technologies, International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 44, No. 24, 2006, pp.5225-5246.

DOI: 10.1080/00207540600558320

Google Scholar

[12] J.S. Oberoi, J.S. Khamba, Sushil and R. Kiran, An empirical examination of advanced manufacturing technology and sourcing practices in developing manufacturing flexibilities, International Journal of Services and Operations Management, Vol. 4, No. 6, 2008, pp.652-671.

DOI: 10.1504/ijsom.2008.018721

Google Scholar

[13] Sushil., SAP-LAP models of inquiry, Management Decision, Vol. 38, No. 5, 2000, pp.347-353.

DOI: 10.1108/00251740010340526

Google Scholar

[80] 32.

Google Scholar

[10] 34.

Google Scholar

[5] 46.

Google Scholar

[3] 46.

Google Scholar

42 Spring Pin Section Facing.

Google Scholar

[78] 38.

Google Scholar

[11] 23.

Google Scholar

[6] 46.

Google Scholar

[2] 45.

Google Scholar

[1] 48 Tapping.

Google Scholar

[72] 45.

Google Scholar

[9] 34.

Google Scholar

[7] 56.

Google Scholar

[5] 64.

Google Scholar

[5] 01 Grooving.

Google Scholar

[80] 98.

Google Scholar

[5] 65.

Google Scholar

[4] 38.

Google Scholar

[7] 68.

Google Scholar

[1] 31 Average values for this section.

Google Scholar

[77] 27.

Google Scholar

[8] 74.

Google Scholar

[6] 13.

Google Scholar

[5] 26.

Google Scholar

[2] 6 Centre Bolt Section Turning.

Google Scholar

[73] 78.

Google Scholar

[10] 67.

Google Scholar

[6] 53.

Google Scholar

[4] 78.

Google Scholar

[4] 24 Thread Cutting.

Google Scholar

[80] 67.

Google Scholar

[7] 52.

Google Scholar

[8] 59.

Google Scholar

[2] 32.

Google Scholar

90 Average values for this section.

Google Scholar

[77] 23.

Google Scholar

[9] 10.

Google Scholar

[7] 56.

Google Scholar

[3] 55.

Google Scholar

[2] 57 TABLE 2: UTILIZATION OF DIFFERENT MACHINES WRT COST Machine Running Cost (in Rs) Machine Hours Running Cost Difference (in Rs) Machine Hours Non- Utilization (%) Utilization (%) M1 (Spring Shackle Bolt Copying Carrying Arrangement) 3556 2920 1312 3010.

Google Scholar

[38] 03.

Google Scholar

[61] 97 M2 (Centreless Grinding machine with Low Cost Automation) 2920 2530 1030 2690.

Google Scholar

[37] 50.

Google Scholar

[62] 50 M3 (Modified Grease Slotting Machine) 3040 2635 1230 2457.

Google Scholar

[37] 73.

Google Scholar

[62] 27 M4 (SPM for Thread Cutting) 3455 2768 1280 2367.

Google Scholar

[31] 68.

Google Scholar

[68] 32 M5 (SPM for Spring Pin Low Cost Automation) 3240 2630 1120 2740.

Google Scholar

[36] 01.

Google Scholar

[63] 99 Average 3242. 2 2696. 6 1194. 4 2652. 8.

Google Scholar

[36] 19.

Google Scholar

[63] 81.

Google Scholar