Multi-Criteria Decision Making for Mechanic Product Design Schemes Based on Layered Ordinal Relation Analysis

Article Preview

Abstract:

In order to deal with the difficulty and complicated process of choosing the best product design scheme from several available ones, with the view of satisfying the demands of the users, a multi-criteria decision-making approach is put forward, which is based on layered ordinal relation analysis and aimed to choose the optimal mechanical product design scheme. The basic ideas and detailed procedure are listed out. On this basis, the feasibility of the method is testified with the evaluation and decision-making of the forging machine main frame design schemes as an example. Such a method makes it convenient to analyze the design schemes of large complicated mechanical products; compared with the analytic hierarchy process, it avoids the limitation of the number of elements and reduces the amount of calculation.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

3990-3996

Citation:

Online since:

October 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Zhong Shi-sheng, Wang Ti-chun, Ding Gang. Mechanism scheme design based on multi-attribute gray interval relevant optimized decision-making model [J]. Control and Decision, 2008, 23(12): 1378-1382.

Google Scholar

[2] Yang Ming-shun, Li Yan, Lin Zhi-hang. Combinatorial decision-making on product outline schemes evaluation & optimum selection [J]. Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 2006, 12(4): 540-545.

Google Scholar

[3] Gu Ying-kui, Yang Zhen-yu. Fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making model for conceptual design candidates evaluation [J]. Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 2007, 13(8): 1504-1510.

Google Scholar

[4] Liu Kai-di, Zhao Qi, Zhou Shao-ling, et al. Fuzzy comprehensive evaluation for conceptual design of mechanic product based on new membership conversion [J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2009, 45 (12): 162-166.

DOI: 10.3901/jme.2009.12.162

Google Scholar

[5] Guo Ya-jun. The Comprehensive Evaluation Theories, Methods and Applications[M]. Beijing: Science Press, (2008).

Google Scholar