Investigation and Modeling of Compaction Behavior of Plain Fabrics

Article Preview

Abstract:

Fabric compressibility is very important in all RTM processes, and affects both the material and processing properties of the part. As the fabric is compressed by fluid pressure or the mold surface the fibers get compacted and the fiber volume fraction increases. This decreases the thickness of the part, decreases the permeability, and decreases the porosity. Compressibility is possibly more important to understand in one sided molding processes than in closed-mold processes. In this study, changing in permeability for four types of fibers that have been under pressure is measured. Based on experimental data related to permeability changes, for each type of fibers, plotted corresponding curves using interpolation and for each sample, modeled its behavior. Finally, the model outputs for several samples compared with experimental data to evaluate precision of model. The results showed that this model with low error can predict the permeability changes of fibers.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

611-615

Citation:

Online since:

October 2011

Authors:

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] J.F. Mandell, D.D. Samborsky, D.S. Cairns, Fatigue of Composite Materials and Substructures for Wind Turbine Blades, SAND 2002-0771, March (2002).

DOI: 10.2172/793410

Google Scholar

[2] K. Hoes, D. Dineseu, H. Sol, M. Vanheule, R. Parnas, Y. Luo, I. Verpoest, New Set-up for Measurement of Permeability Properties of Fibrous Reinforcements‏ for RTM, Composites Part A 2002, Vol 33, No. 7, 959-969.

DOI: 10.1016/s1359-835x(02)00035-0

Google Scholar

[3] P. Ferland, D. Guittard, F. Trochu, Concurrent Methods for Permeability‏ Measurement in Resin Transfer Molding, Polymer Composites, February 1996, Vol. 17, No. 1, 149-158.

DOI: 10.1002/pc.10600

Google Scholar

[4] R. Parnas, K. Flynn, M. Dal-Favero, A Permeability Database for Composites‏ Manufacturing, Polymer Composites, October 1997, Vol. 18, No. 5, 623-633.

DOI: 10.1002/pc.10313

Google Scholar

[5] R. Parnas, J.G. Howard, . T L. Luce, S. Advani, Permeability Characterization. Part 1: A Proposed Standard Reference Fabric for Permeability, Polymer Composites, December 1995, Vol. 16, No. 6, 429-445.

DOI: 10.1002/pc.750160602

Google Scholar

[6] Y. Luo, I. Verpoest, K. Hoes, M. Vanheule, H. Sol, A. Cardon, Permeability Measurement of Textile Reinforcements with Several Test Fluids, Composites Part A, 2001, Vol. 32, No. 10, 1497-1504.

DOI: 10.1016/s1359-835x(01)00049-5

Google Scholar

[7] J. A. Acheson, P. Simacek, S.G. Advani, The Implications of Fiber Compaction‏ and Saturation on Fully Coupled VARTM Simulation, Composites Part‏ A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, Feb 2004, Vol. 35, 159-169.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2003.02.001

Google Scholar

[8] Nina Kuentzer a, Pavel Simacek c, Suresh G. Advani a, Shawn Walsh‏ Correlation of void distribution to‏ VARTM manufacturing techniques‏, Composites: Part A 38 (2007) 802–813.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2006.08.005

Google Scholar

[9] R. Pan, Z. Liang, C. Zhang, B. Wang, Statistical Characterization of Fiber Permeability for Composite Manufacturing, Polymer Composites, December 2000, Vol. 21, No. 6, 996-1006.

DOI: 10.1002/pc.10253

Google Scholar

[10] B.R. Gebart, Permeability of Unidirectional Reinforcements for RTM, Journal of Composite Materials, 1992, Vol. 26, No. 8, 1100-1133.

DOI: 10.1177/002199839202600802

Google Scholar

[11] J.F. Delerue, S.V. Lomov, R.S. Parnas, I. Verpoest, and M. Wevers, Pore Network Modeling of Permeability for Textile Reinforcements, Polymer Composites, June 2003, Vol. 24, No. 3, 344-357.

DOI: 10.1002/pc.10034

Google Scholar

[12] D Mastbergen, Simulation and Testing of Resin Infusion Manufacturing Processes for Large Composite Structures, " Master, s Thesis in Mechanical Engineering, Montana State University-Bozeman, August (2004).

Google Scholar