Comparison of in-Process Cutting State Detection in CNC Turning Using Different Neural Network Systems

Article Preview

Abstract:

The aim of this research is to propose and compare the in-process detection systems of the cutting states of the continuous chip, the broken chip and the chatter for the carbon steel in CNC turning process by utilizing the sensor fusion, which are the force sensor, the sound sensor, the accelerometer sensor and the acoustic emission sensor. The new six parameters proposed for the inputs of the neural network systems, which are the enegy spectral densities of three dynamic cutting forces, sound signal, accelation signal, and the standard deviation of acoustic emission signal. All signals of parameters have been integrated via the different neural network systems by using the pattern recognition and the percertron technique to detect the cutting states, which are. Among the cutting states of chip formation and chatter, the broken chip is required for the reliable and stable cutting system. The experimentally obtained results showed that the in-process detection system using the neural network with the pattern recognition technique can be effectively used to detect the cutting states with the higher accuracy and reliability more than the one with the perceptron technique.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

1942-1946

Citation:

Online since:

October 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] T. Somkiat: Journal of Advanced Mechanical Design System and Manufacturing, Vol. 2 (2008), pp.366-377.

Google Scholar

[2] E. Govekar, J. Gradisek and I. Grabec: Ultrasonics, Vol. 38 (2000), pp.598-603.

Google Scholar

[3] T. Somkiat and T. Moriwaki: Journal of Manufacturing Processes, Vol. 10 (2008), pp.40-46.

Google Scholar

[4] I. Inasaki: Ultrasonics, Vol. 36 (1998), pp.273-281.

Google Scholar

[5] H.Y. Kim and J.H. Ahn: International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, Vol. 42 (2002), p.1113–1119.

Google Scholar

[6] E. Kuljanic, G. Totis and M. Sortino: Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, Vol. 23 (2009), pp.1704-1718.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2009.01.003

Google Scholar

[7] D.A. Axinte: International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, Vol. 46 (2006), pp.1445-1448.

Google Scholar