Making Decision for Sustainable Product Lifecycle: A Markov Decision Process Based Method

Jun Feng Wang; Ning Wang; Jin Feng Rao

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.121-126.2080

Paper Titles

Inventory Management with Uncertain Demands Based on Probability Methods
p.2064

Kinematic Modeling and Simulation of Two Robots Coordinated Manipulation
p.2067

Kinematics Simulation Analysis of Shots in Shot Blasting Machine Based on EDEM
p.2071

LabVIEW-Based Wireless Monitoring System of CNC Machine Tools
p.2075

Making Decision for Sustainable Product Lifecycle: A Markov Decision Process Based Method
p.2080

Modal Analysis of Automotive Steering System Based on Finite Element Method
p.2085

Modeling and Simulation of Electric Power Steering System Based on Multi-Body Dynamics
p.2091

Modeling and Simulation of Milling Forces for Ball-End Cutter with Considering Comprehensive Factors
p.2098

Modeling and Simulation Research on Pavement Transducer Device Based on AMESim
p.2105

HomeApplied Mechanics and MaterialsApplied Mechanics and Materials Vols. 121-126Making Decision for Sustainable Product Lifecycle:...

Making Decision for Sustainable Product Lifecycle: A Markov Decision Process Based Method

Abstract:

As energy, resource and environmental issues become more and more serious, sustainable product attracts increasing attention. Products with short lifecycle, such as consumer electronics, gain particular concern. Authors formulate a sustainable product lifecycle evolution method based on Markov decision process. It was validated by an example that the method can select suitable phases at which company should invest money and resources.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Frontiers of Manufacturing and Design Science II

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Applied Mechanics and Materials (Volumes 121-126)

Pages:

2080-2084

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.121-126.2080

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

October 2011

Authors:

Jun Feng Wang, Ning Wang, Jin Feng Rao

Keywords:

Closed Loop Supply Chain, Decision-Making, Markov Decision Process, Sustainable Product Lifecycle

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

Citation:

References

[1] Brundtland, G., 1987. Our Common Future: The World Commission on Environment and Development. Oxford University Press, Oxford, p. (1987).

Google Scholar

[2] Windrum, P., Birchenhall, C., 1998. Is product lifecycle theory a special case? Dominant designs and emergence of market niches through coevolutionary-learning. Structural Change and Economic Dynamic, 109–134.

DOI: 10.1016/s0954-349x(97)00039-8

Google Scholar

[3] Curran, R., Gomis, G., Castagne, S., Butterfield, J., Edgar, T., Higgins, C., Mckeever, C., 2007. Integrated digital design for manufacturing for reduced life cycle cost. International Journal of Production Economics, 27–40.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2006.11.010

Google Scholar

[4] Guide Jr., V.D.R., Wassenhove, L.N.V., 2002. Closed-loop supply chains. In: Ayres, R., Ayres, L. (Eds. ), A Handbook of Industrial Ecology. Edward Elgar, Northampton, MA, p.497–509.

DOI: 10.1017/s1466046603261123

Google Scholar

[5] Majumder, P., Groenevelt, H., 2001. Competition in remanufacturing. Production and Operations Management, 125–141.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1937-5956.2001.tb00074.x

Google Scholar

[6] Nair, A., Closs, D.J., 2006. An examination of the impact of coordinating supply chain policies and price markdowns on short lifecycle product retail performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 379–392.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2005.04.009

Google Scholar

[7] Chiang, T., Trappey, A., 2007. Development of value chain collaborative model for product lifecycle management and its LCD industry adoption. International Journal of Production Economics, 90–104.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2006.11.005

Google Scholar

[8] Fandel, G., Stammen, M., 2004. A general model for extended strategic supply chain management with emphasis on product life cycles including development and recycling. International Journal of Production Economics, 293–308.

DOI: 10.1016/s0925-5273(03)00198-1

Google Scholar