Selecting Problem from Design Contradiction Set Found in QFD

Article Preview

Abstract:

To optimize the solution concept towards high value of customer satisfaction, the research on the combination of quality function deployment (QFD) and TRIZ (QFD/TRIZ) has been undertaken in the last decades. And TRIZ is introduced to eliminate the contradictions found in the QFD/TRIZ. However, solution concept is a unity of opposites. It is impossible to eliminate all contradictions. Therefore, it is significant to select and eliminate the contradictions which are mainly encumbrance for solution concept to get high value of customer satisfaction. Through this article, we proposed an approach to help designer analyze, rank and select the contradictions from contradiction set found in QFD. Contradiction model is identified to present the problem of TRIZ and link to QFD. Two computable ways are introduced to express the importance and extensive extent of a contradiction in the contradiction set. And the method to rank and select contradictions in the contradictions set is expatiated. Finally, a case is used to shown the validity of the proposed approach.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

690-694

Citation:

Online since:

January 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Chen Yizeng, Tang Jiafu, Ren Liyi Hong, Rongtao, China Mechanical Engineering, 14(2003)967-970.

Google Scholar

[2] HERBERT MOSKOWITZ, KWANG JAE KIM: QFD OPTIMIZER: A NOVICE FRIENDLY QUALITY FUNCTION DEPLOYMENT DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM FOR OPTIMIZING PRODUCT DESIGNS. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 32(1997)641-655.

DOI: 10.1016/s0360-8352(96)00309-9

Google Scholar

[3] Jiafu Tang, Richard Y.K. Fung, Baodong Xu, Dingwei Wang: A new approach to quality function deployment planning with financial consideration. Computers & Operations Research, 29(2002) 1447-1463.

DOI: 10.1016/s0305-0548(01)00041-7

Google Scholar

[4] E. Ertugrul Karsak, Sevin Sozer, S. Emre Alptekin: Product planning in quality function deployment using a combined analytic network process and goal programming approach. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 44(2003)171-190.

DOI: 10.1016/s0360-8352(02)00191-2

Google Scholar

[5] Information on http: /www. triz-journal. com.

Google Scholar

[6] Shang Liu, Dong-yan Shi, Ying Zhang, THIRD IFIP WG 5. 4 WORKING CONFERENCE, CAI 2009, 314(2009) 117-126.

Google Scholar

[7] TAN Run-hua, MA Jian-hong, ZHANG Huan gao, YUAN Cai-yun, Mechanical Design, 2002, 9.

Google Scholar

[8] Changhua Qiu, Shang Liu and Dongyan Shi, Key Engineering Materials, 450(2010)61-64.

Google Scholar

[9] Information on http: /www. inventive-design. net/component/option.

Google Scholar

[10] You-bai Xie, Product performance features and modern design, Chinese Mechanical Engineering, 2000, 2: 26-32.

Google Scholar

[11] L.P. Khoo, N.C. Ho, Framework of a fuzzy quality function deployment system, International Journal of Production Research, 34(1996), pp.299-311.

DOI: 10.1080/00207549608904904

Google Scholar