A Simple Method to Estimate the Fatigue Crack Growth Life of Repaired Pipes with Composite Patches

Article Preview

Abstract:

In this paper, a simplified method is performed to predict the fatigue crack growth life of repaired pipes by glass/epoxy composite patches. For this purpose, an already developed automatic procedure by the authors is adapted to handle 3D crack growth analyses of repaired pipes subjected to internal cyclic pressure. The analyses are performed for offshore pipes made of low-strength steel containing an initial fatigue corrosion crack and repaired by glass/epoxy composite patch. Finally, an equation is presented here suggesting a point along the thickness of a repaired pipe in which, the calculated fatigue crack growth life based on the fracture parameters of that point in a simple uniform crack growth modeling along the pipe thickness (UCG) is almost equal to the calculated fatigue life in non-uniform crack growth analysis (NUCG) or a real crack-front modeling approach.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

387-392

Citation:

Online since:

January 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] A. Carpinteri: International Journal of Fatigue Vol. 15 (1993), p.21.

Google Scholar

[2] N. C. Fawley: Development of Fiberglass Composite Systems for Natural Gas Pipeline Service (Final Report prepared for the Gas Research Institute, GRI-95/0072, USA 1994).

Google Scholar

[3] C. J. Kuhlman, U. S. Lindholm, D. R. Stephens, T. J. Kilinski, and R. B. Francini: Long-Term Reliability of Gas Pipeline Repairs by Reinforced Composites (Final Report to the Gas Research Institute, GRI-95/0071, USA 1995).

Google Scholar

[4] American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Gas Transmission and Distribution Piping Systems, ASME B31. 8, New York, New York, (2003).

Google Scholar

[5] PCC-2-2006 Repair of Pressure Equipment and Piping Standard, ASME, New York, USA, (2006).

Google Scholar

[6] DC Seo, JJ. Lee: Comp. Struct. Vol. 57 (2002), p.323.

Google Scholar

[7] H. Hosseini–Toudeshky, M. Saber, B. Mohammadi: J Finite Elem. Analysis Design Vol. 45 (2009) p.94.

Google Scholar

[8] H. Hosseini-Toudeshky, B. Mohammadi: Comp. Struct. Vol. 79 (2007), p.234.

Google Scholar

[9] H.A. Richard, F.G. Buchholz, G. Kulmer, M. Schollmann: Adv. Frac. Damage Mech. Vol. 251 (2003) p.251.

Google Scholar

[10] M. L. Duan, C.M. James, L. Jing: Int. J. Offshore and Polar Eng. Vol 9 (1999), p.68.

Google Scholar

[11] ASTM A537/A537M-8, Standard Specification for Pressure Vessel Plates, Heat-Treated, Carbon-Manganese-Silicon Steel. Annual book of ASTM standard 2004; 1(4).

DOI: 10.1520/a0537_a0537m

Google Scholar

[12] H. Hosseini-Toudeshky, B. Mohammadi, S. Bakhshandeh: J. Fatigue Frac. Eng. Mat. Struct. Vol. 30 (2007), p.629.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-2695.2007.01142.x

Google Scholar