For Libraries For Publication Open Access Downloads About Us Contact Us
Paper Titles
Study on Surface Sizing of Cationic Polyacrylate Emulsion to Improve Mechanical Properties of Paper
p.287
Effect of Different Ceramic Fibers on Properties of Paper Handsheets
p.292
Packaging Application of Molecular Sieve-Added Polyethylene Composite Films for Fresh Cherry Tomato
p.296
A Test Software for Cushioning Characteristics of Packaging Materials
p.300
The Influence of Flexible Film with Releasing Sulfur Dioxide on Quality of 'Vitis labruscana Kyoho' Table Grapes
p.305
The Study on the Mechanical Properties of Poly(lactic acid)/Straw Fiber Composites
p.312
Rheological Behavior and Cell Morphology of Foamed Waste Paper Pulp/ High Density Polyethylene Composites
p.316
Effects of Coupling Agents on the Mechanical Properties of the Calcium Carbonate-Plastic Composite Packaging Materials
p.321
Mechanical Performance and Microstructure of Plant Fiber Reinforced LDPE Foamed Composites
p.325

The Influence of Flexible Film with Releasing Sulfur Dioxide on Quality of 'Vitis labruscana Kyoho' Table Grapes

Article Preview

Abstract:

An active packaging film (APF1) with releasing low concentration sulfur dioxide (SO2) was tested on quality of ‘vitis labruscana kyoho’ table grape. All samples were stored at 5°C and during the storage period the main quality parameters, weight loss, berries shatter, decay, firmness, total soluble solids content (TSS), total acid (TA, using the PH of grape juice instead of the TA ), Vitamin c (Vc) content were monitored and compared with the control sample unpacked in any film. Results demonstrated that APF1 could reduce water loss of table grapes, prevent it from pathogens infection. The results also showed that APF1 could greatly guarantee a long shelf life for grape. After storage 56 days (storage at 0~5°C), the water loss, berry firmness, TA and Vc content in grapes packaged in APF1 were slowly reduced, TSS was slight increased, percentage of shatter and decayed berries of grapes were 22% and 27%, respectively. The percentage of berries decay of grapes packaged in APF1 was reduced to 5% from 21% for control batches on 11th days. All unpackaged table grapes (control batches) were decayed after 28 days. APF1 would help to preserve quality and extend shelf life of table grapes.

You might also be interested in these eBooks
Packaging Science and Technology View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Applied Mechanics and Materials (Volume 200)

Pages:

305-311

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.200.305

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

October 2012

Authors:

Dong Li Li, Wen Cai Xu, Zun Zhong Liu, Ya Bo Fu, Ya Jun Wang

Keywords:

Flexible Film, Fungicide, Shelf Life, Sulfur Dioxide (SO2), Table Grape

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

References

[1] A.E. Kelany, S.M. Abdel-Wahab, A.A. Abdel-hafeez and I.A. Emam: Journal of Horticultural Science & Ornamental Plants, Vol. 3 (2011) No.1. pp.11-21.

Google Scholar

[2] C.H. Crisosto, J.L. Smilanick. www2.uckac.edu/postharv/.../Guidelines/tablegrape.pdf

Google Scholar

[3] P.V. Mahajan, F.A.S. Rodrigues and E. Leflaive: Biosystems Engineering, Vol. 100 (2008) No.4. pp.555-561.

Google Scholar

[4] C. Costa, A. Lucera, A. Conte, M. Mastromatteo, B. Speranza, A. Antonacci and M.A. Del. Nobile: Journal of Food Engineering, Vol. 102 (2011) No.2. pp.115-121.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2010.08.001

Google Scholar

[5] I. Romero and M. Anthocyanin: Journal of Plant Physiology, Vol. 165 (2008) No.5. pp.522-530

Google Scholar

[6] Y. Deng, Y. Wu and Y.F. Li: LWT Food Science and Technology, Vol. 39 (2006) No.6. pp.584-590.

Google Scholar

[7] M.T. Sanchez-Ballesta, J.B. Jiménez and I. Romero: Postharvest Biology and Technology, Vol. 42 (2006) No.3. pp.209-216.

Google Scholar

[8] M.T. Sanchez-Ballesta, I. Romero and J.B. Jiménez: Postharvest Biology and Technology, Vol. 46 (2007) No.1. pp.29-35.

Google Scholar

[9] F. Artés-Hernández, E. Aguayo and F. Artés. Postharvest Biology and Technology, Vol. 31 (2004) No.1. pp.59-67.

DOI: 10.1016/s0925-5214(03)00116-9

Google Scholar

[10] V.H. Tournas and E. Katsoudas: International Journal of Food Microbiology, Vol. 105 (2005) No.1. pp.11-17.

Google Scholar

[11] O.A. Karabulut, F.M. Gabler, M. Mansour and J.L. Smilanick: Postharvest Biology and Technology, Vol. 34 (2004) No.2. pp.169-177.

DOI: 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2004.05.003

Google Scholar

[12] Y. Zutahy, A. Lichter, T. Kaplunov and S. Lurie: Postharvest Biology and Technology, Vol. 50 (2008) No.1. pp.12-17.

DOI: 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2008.03.006

Google Scholar

[13] M.T. Pretel, M.C. Martínez-Madrid, J.R. Martínez, J.C. Carreño and F. Romojaro: LWT-Food Science and Technology, Vol. 39 (2006) No.10. pp.1109-1116.

DOI: 10.1016/j.lwt.2005.07.022

Google Scholar

[14] C.H. Crisosto, L. Palou, D. Garner and D.A. Armson: HortTechnology, Vol. 12 (2002) No.2. pp.241-245.

Google Scholar

[15] C.H. Crisosto, L. Palou and D. Garner: Central Valley Postharvest Newsletter, Vol. 10 (2001) No.2. pp.1-3.

Google Scholar

[16] J. P. Zoffoli, B. A. Latorre, E. J. Rodríguez and P. Aldunce: Postharvest Biology and Technology, Vol. 15 (1999) No.2. pp.135-142.

Google Scholar

[17] F. Artés-Hernández, F.A. Tomás-Barberán and F. Artés: Postharvest Biology and Technology, Vol. 39 (2006) No.2. pp.146-154.

DOI: 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2005.10.006

Google Scholar

[18] D. Martínez-Romero, F. Guillén: International Journal of Food Microbiology, Vol. 115 (2007) No.2. pp.144-148.

Google Scholar

[19] X.H. Meng, B.Q. Li, J. Liu and S.P. Tia: Food Chemistry, Vol. 106 (2008) No.2. pp.501-508.

Google Scholar

[20] L. Sánchez-González, C. Pastor, M. Vargas and A. Chiralt: Postharvest Biology and Technology, Vol. 60 (2011) No.1. pp.57-63.

Google Scholar

[21] W.T. Xu, X.L. Peng and Y.B. Luo: LWT-Food Science and Technology, Vol. 4 (2009) No.2. pp.471-476.

Google Scholar

[22] W.T. Xu, K.L. Huang and F. Guo: Postharvest Biology and Technology, Vol. 46 (2007) No.1. pp.86-94.

Google Scholar

[23] R. Pinto, A. Lichter, A. Danshin and S. Sela: Postharvest Biology and Technology, Vol. 39 (2006) No.3. pp.308-313.

DOI: 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2005.10.018

Google Scholar

[24] O. A. Karabulut, F.M. Gabler, M. Mansour and J.L. Smilanic: Postharvest Biology and Technology, Vol. 34 (2004) No.2. pp.169-177.

Google Scholar

[25] A. Lichter, Y. Zutkhy and L. Sonego: Postharvest Biology and Technology, Vol. 24 (2002) No.3. pp.301-308.

DOI: 10.1016/s0925-5214(01)00141-7

Google Scholar

[26] S. Castillo, D. Navarro, P.J. Zapata and F. Guillén: Postharvest Biology and Technology, Vol. 57 (2010) No.3. pp.183-188.

Google Scholar

[27] F. M. Gabler, J. Mercier, J.I. Jiménez and J.L. Smilanick: Postharvest Biology and Technology, Vol. 55 (2010) No.2. pp.78-84.

Google Scholar

[28] W.C. Xu, D.L. Li, Y.B. Fu and H. Wei: Advanced Materials Research, Vol. 174 (2011). pp.480-485.

Google Scholar

[29] J, M, Valverde, D. Valero and D. Martianez-Romero. J. Agric: Food Chem. Vol. 53 (2005) No.20. pp.7807-7813.

Google Scholar

[30] AOAC, Sidney Williams (1984). Official methods of analysis. Association of Official Analytical Chemists. Published 1984 by Association of Official Analytical Chemists in Arlington, VA.

DOI: 10.5962/bhl.title.44636

Google Scholar

[31] M. Ogunlesi, W. Okiei, L. Azeez, V. Obakachi, M. Osunsanmi and G. Nkenchor: Int. J. Electrochem. Sci., Vol. 5 (2010). pp.105-115

DOI: 10.1016/s1452-3981(23)15270-9

Google Scholar

[32] I.C.M.R 1990. Manual Methods of Analysis for Adulterants and Contaminants in Foods. pp.41-52.

Google Scholar

[33] Method for determination of sulphite in foods. P.R. China , GB/T 5009. pp.34-1996.

Google Scholar

[34] C Crisosto, D H.Garner, and G Crisosto: PostharVest Biol. Technol. Vol. 26 (2002) No.2. pp.181-189.

Google Scholar

[35] J.M. Harvey, C.M. Harris, T.A. Hanke and P.L. Hartsell: Am. J. Enol. Vitic. Vol. 39 (1988) No.2. pp.132-136.

Google Scholar

[36] M.A. Del Nobile, M. Sinigaglia and A. Conte: Postharvest Biology and Technology, Vol. 47 (2008) No.3. pp.389-396.

Google Scholar

[37] R. Sothornvit and P. Rodsamran: Postharvest Biology and Technology. Vol. 47 (2008) No.3. pp.407-415

Google Scholar

[38] P.R. Poudel1, R. Mochioka, K. Beppu and I. Kataoka: J. Japan. Soc. Hort. Sci. Vol. 78 (2009) No.2. pp.169-174.

Google Scholar

[39] S.K. Lee and A.A. Kader: Postharvest Biol. Technol. Vol. 20 (2000) No.3. p.207–220.

Google Scholar

[40] C. H Crisosto and F.G. Mitchell: Postharvest Technology of Horticulture Crops. (2002). pp.357-363.

Google Scholar

© 2025 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies. For open access content, terms of the Creative Commons licensing CC-BY are applied.
Scientific.Net is a registered trademark of Trans Tech Publications Ltd.