CAN-Based Parallel Guidance System for Agricultural Machinery

Article Preview

Abstract:

The objective of this study was to develop a CAN-based parallel guidance system for small agricultural machinery. The system consisted of field computer, light bar and DGPS receiver. The field computer was developed using PC/104 CPU module, running on the embedded real-time operation system customized by a special development tool. Single chip and CAN controller were selected for guidance light bar design, which used a row of indicator LEDs to guide drivers. Field computer and guidance light bar communicated with each other based on CAN bus. The guidance software running on the field computer was designed in object-oriented manner by integrating embedded GIS development kit. In field test, the average of offline distance was 0.452 meter. The lowest percentage overlap and skip were 3.64% and 3.82% respectively. Results showed that this kind of guidance system was suitable for small-size machinery and could provide effective guidance aid for field operation.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

349-354

Citation:

Online since:

October 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Meng Zhijun , Zhao Chunjiang , Wang Xiu etc. Field Multi-source Information collection system Based on GPS for Precision Agriculture, Transaction of CSAE. 2003. 19 (4): 13-18.

Google Scholar

[2] O'Connor, M., T. Bell, G. Elkaim, and B. Parkinson. Automatic steering of farm vehicles using GPS. 3rd International Conference on Precision Agriculture, Minneapolis, MN. (1996).

DOI: 10.2134/1996.precisionagproc3.c91

Google Scholar

[3] John v. Stafford. Development of a Simulation for a GPS Receiver. Precision Agriculture'97. 1997: 603-610. Silsoe Research Institute, UK.: BIOS Scientific Publishers.

Google Scholar

[4] Richey, C.B., 1959. Automatic pilot, for farm tractors. Agricultural Engineering, 40(2): 78–79, 93.

Google Scholar

[5] Kanayama, Y., and B. I. Hartman, 1989. Smooth local path planning for autonomous vehicles. In Proc. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 3: 1265-1270.

DOI: 10.1109/robot.1989.100154

Google Scholar

[6] Matsuo, Y., D. Yukomoto, and N. Noguchi. Navigation systems and work performance of tillage robot. 1998. ASAE Paper No. 98-3192. St. Joseph, MI: ASAE.

Google Scholar

[7] Linda D. Whipker, Jay T. Akridge. 2005. Precision Agriculture Services Dealership Survey Results. CropLife Magazine and the Center for Food and Agricultural Business Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University West Lafayette, IN 47907-(2056).

DOI: 10.3808/jei.201700360

Google Scholar

[8] Buick, R. and E. White. 1999. Comparing GPS guidance with foam marker guidance. In: Proc. Of the 4th Int'l Conf. on Precision Agriculture, editors: R.H. Rust and W.E. Larson, ASA/CSSA/SSSA, Madison, WI.

DOI: 10.2134/1999.precisionagproc4.c6b

Google Scholar

[9] Ehsani, M. R., Matthew Sullivan, Dr. Joel T. Walker, T. L. Zimmerman. A Method of Evaluating Different Guidance Systems. 2002 ASAE Annual Meeting. Paper number 021155.

DOI: 10.13031/2013.9153

Google Scholar