Inter-City Public Transportation Pricing Based on Game Theory Analysis

Article Preview

Abstract:

Rail transit system and buses are the two main modes of public passenger transportation between adjacent cities in China. The development of public transport system and especially that of the rail transit may promote the sustainable development of the region. According to principle of utility maximization, this paper predicts passengers’ traffic mode choices based on evaluation model of passenger’s general traffic expenses. This paper analyzes the game relation of pricing between Rail Company and Bus Company on the condition of free competition from the perspective of maximizations of profit. It presents the model of public transportation pricing strategy and the model of subsidy policy in two situations respectively, which are when government subsides public transportation and when government does not. This paper provides basis for related administrative departments to make policies on sustainable transport pricing.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

902-906

Citation:

Online since:

October 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Huang Yuangao. Zhou Jing. Fare competition between highway and public transport[J]. Journal of Southeast University (Natural Science Edition). 2004, 34(2): 268-273. (In Chinese)

Google Scholar

[2] Ferrari P. Road network toll pricing and social welfare [J]. Transportation Research B , 2002 , 36 (5) : 471-483.

DOI: 10.1016/s0191-2615(01)00016-9

Google Scholar

[3] Beckman M J. On optimal tolls for highways, tunnels, bridges, vehicular [A] . In : Edie L C , Herman R , Rothery R, eds. Vehicular Traffic Science[C] . New York: American Elsevier, 1965, 331-341.

Google Scholar

[4] May A D , Milne D S. Effects of alternative road pricing systems on network performance [J] . Transportation Research A , 2000 , 34 (6) : 407-436.

DOI: 10.1016/s0965-8564(99)00015-4

Google Scholar

[5] Bellei G, Gentile G, Papola N. Network pricing optimization in multi-user and multi-modal context with elastic demand [J]. Transportation Research B, 2002, 36 (9) :779-798.

DOI: 10.1016/s0191-2615(01)00030-3

Google Scholar

[6] Chen Kuan-min, LUO Xiao-qiang. Game-theory of reasonable ticket price for urban railway transport [J].Journal of Changan University (Natural Science Edition), 2005,25(4):52-55. (in Chinese)

Google Scholar

[7] Evans A. A theoretical comparison of competition with other economic regimes for bus services [J]. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 1987, 21 (1) : 7-36

Google Scholar

[8] Yang H , Yagar. Traffic Assignment and Traffic Control in General Freeway - arterial Corridor Systems [J] . Transportation Research, 1994, 28 : 463 -486.

DOI: 10.1016/0191-2615(94)90015-9

Google Scholar

[9] Yang H. Sensitivity Analysis for Queuing Equilibrium Network Flow and Its Application to Traffic Control [J] . Math. Comp. Modeling, 1995, 22 : 223 - 235.

Google Scholar

[10] Zhou Jing, Xu Yan. Generalized Nash managing game model for transit network[J]. Journal of Systems Engineering, 2001,16(4):261-267(in Chinese)

Google Scholar

[11] Evans A. Competition and the structure of local bus markets [J]. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 1990, 24 (3) : 255-281

Google Scholar