Combining Six Sigma with Kaizen Blitz for Enhancing Process Interaction

Article Preview

Abstract:

It’s imperative to find appropriate way for company to achieve the goal to quickly respond to customer requirement and increase customer satisfaction. This encouraged them to adopt either Six Sigma for improving process through process interaction or Lean for reducing waste in processes. However, both Six Sigma and Lean have limitations. As a result, the enterprises tend to combine their strengths. This paper represents similarities and differences between Lean, Six Sigma and Kaizen. Furthermore, the integration between the techniques and tools of TQM, Six Sigma and Lean help to find a way integrating Six Sigma and Kaizen. The paper combines Six Sigma with Kaizen Blitz (DMAIC-KB) which is based on advantages of Six Sigma and Kaizen concept under PDCA cycle. This approach emphasizes on small project, customer requirement response and customer satisfaction in short time by detecting, analyzing and improving the problems and dysfunctions during process via process interaction.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

1220-1225

Citation:

Online since:

June 2010

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2010 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Mahesh M., Wong Y. S. A Six-sigma approach for benchmarking of RP&M processes. Int J Adv Manuf Technol, 2006, 31: 374-387.

DOI: 10.1007/s00170-005-0201-z

Google Scholar

[2] Andersson R., Eriksson H., Torstensson H. Similarities and differences between TQM six sigma and lean, The TQM Magazine, 2006, 18, 282-296.

DOI: 10.1108/09544780610660004

Google Scholar

[3] Arnheiter D. E., Maleyeff J. The integration of lean management and Six Sigma, The TQM magazine, 2005, 17, 5-18.

DOI: 10.1108/09544780510573020

Google Scholar

[4] Bendell T. A review and comparison of six sigma and the lean organizations, The TQM magazine, 2006, 18, 255-262.

DOI: 10.1108/09544780610659989

Google Scholar

[5] Berger A. Continuous improvement and kaizen: standardization and organizational designs, Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 1997, 8, 110-117.

DOI: 10.1108/09576069710165792

Google Scholar

[6] Chen H. C., Chen K. S. An application of six sigma methodology to enhance leisure service quality, Qual Quant, 2009, 2: 25-36.

DOI: 10.1007/s11135-009-9271-6

Google Scholar

[7] Dahlgaard J. J., Dahlgaard-Park S. M. Lean production six sigma quality TQM and company culture, The TQM magazine, 2006, 18, 263-281.

DOI: 10.1108/09544780610659998

Google Scholar

[8] George L. M. Lean Six Sigma: Combining Six Sigma Quality with Lean Speed, McGraw-Hill, USA, (2002).

DOI: 10.1201/b16401-11

Google Scholar

[9] Eric L., Larry A. Developing an Assessment Tool for Two Organizations Using Six Sigma Principles, Engineering Management Journal, 2009, 21(4): 7-15.

Google Scholar

[10] Kumar M., Antony J., Singh R. K., Tiwar M. K. Implementing the Lean Sigma framework in an Indian SME: a case study, Production Planning & Control, 2006, 17, 407-423.

DOI: 10.1080/09537280500483350

Google Scholar

[11] Florian J., Susanne L., Gregor Z. Six sigma as a business process management method, in services: analysis of the key application problems, Inf Syst E-Bus Manage, 2010, 12: 26-38.

DOI: 10.1007/s10257-010-0128-2

Google Scholar

[12] Pawar, T., L.A. Stauffer. A Comparison of Systematic Design and Design for Six Sigma. Proceedings of the 2007 International Conference on Engineering Design, (2007).

Google Scholar

[13] Deshpande P. B., Tantalean R. Z. Unifying framework for six sigma and process control, Hydrocarbon Processing, 2009, 6: 73-76.

Google Scholar