Estimation of Biogas Production from Shrimp Pond Sediment Using the Artificial Intelligence

Article Preview

Abstract:

A biogas production development increases renewable energy and reduces the environmental impact which is caused by carbon dioxide. Thisis important for energy and environmental planning in Thailand. The biogas production by anaerobic digestionproduces methane that can be used as renewable energy. This research was to study biogas production from the anaerobic digestion of shrimp pond sediment by the batch reaction, an estimation of the mathematical model using theArtificial Intelligence (AI) technique and the treatment of shrimp pond sediment.The mass balance principle to create mathematical modeling and decompositions of organic matter into biogas were used to compare the experimental dataincluding, temperature, pH, biogas flow rate and biochemical properties of the shrimp pond sediment. From the results, mathematical models can estimate the dynamic response of the biogas flow rate and factors that affectedthe biogas productions. The treatment of shrimp pond sediment by anaerobic digestion process could reduce TS, TDS, TSS, TVS, BOD, COD and ECby81-89%, 52-60%, 95-99%, 80-89%, 86-95% , 85-95% and 12-22 % respectively.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

695-700

Citation:

Online since:

December 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Paez-Osuna, F., Guerro-Galvan, S.R., and Ruiz-Fernandez A.C.: Marine Pollution Bulletin Vol. 36, 1(1998), p.65.

Google Scholar

[2] Anh, P.T., Kroeze, C. Bush, S.R. and Mol A.P.: Agriculture Water Management Vol. 97, 6(2010), p.872.

Google Scholar

[3] Simeonov, I. : Chemical and Biochemical Engineering Vol. 8, 2(1994), p.45.

Google Scholar

[4] Simeonov, I., Momchev, V., and Grancharov, D. : Water Research Vol. 30, 5(1996), p.1087.

Google Scholar

[5] Simeonov, I., and Stoyanov, S.: Chemical and Biochemical Engineering Vol. 17, 4(2003), p.285.

Google Scholar

[6] Husain, A.: Biomass and Bioenergy, Vol. 14, 5/6 (1998), p.561.

Google Scholar

[7] Batstone, D.J., Keller, J., Angelidaki, I., Kalyuzhnyi, S.V., Pavlostathis, S.G., Rozzi, A., Sanders, W.T., Siegrist, H., and Vavilin, V.A.: Water Science and Technology Vol. 45, 10(2002), p.65.

DOI: 10.2166/wst.2002.0292

Google Scholar

[8] Boubaker, F., and Cheikh, R. B.: Chemical Engineering Journal Vol. 141, 1-3(2007), p.75.

Google Scholar

[9] Boubaker, F., and Cheikh, R. B.: Bioresource Technology Vol. 99, 14(2008), p.6565.

Google Scholar

[10] Feng, Y., Behrendt, J., Wendland, C., and Otterpohl, R.: Water Science and Technology Vol. 53, 9(2006), p.253.

Google Scholar

[11] Noykova, N., Muller, T.G., Gyllenberg, M., and Timmer, J.: Biotechnology and Bioengineering Vol. 78, 1(2002), p.89.

Google Scholar

[12] Kikuchi, S., Tominaga, D., Arita, M., Takahashi, K., and Tomita, M.: Bioinformatics, Vol. 19, 5(2004), p.643.

Google Scholar

[13] Lo., C.H., Chow, K.M., Wong, Y.K., and Rad, A.B.: Simulation Practice and Theory Vol. 8, 6-7(2001), p.415.

Google Scholar

[14] Puangdownreong D., Areerak K_N., Areerak K_L., Kulworawanichpong T., and Sujitjorn S.: Proceeding of the IASTED International Conference on Modelling, Identification and Control, (2005), pp.178-183.

Google Scholar

[15] Puangdownreong D., Areerak K_N., Srikeaw A., Sujitjorn S. and Totarong P: Proceeding of the 2002 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Technology, Vol. 2(2002), pp.915-920.

DOI: 10.1109/icit.2002.1189290

Google Scholar