The Nonexistence of Three Degrees of Freedom Rotational Fully Decoupled Parallel Mechanism

Article Preview

Abstract:

The existence of coupling makes the parallel mechanism possess some special advantages over the serial mechanism, while it is just the coupling that brings about the parallel mechanism some difficulties in kinematics and dynamic analysis, the development of control system, and the trajectory planning. Therefore the research on the decoupled parallel mechanism becomes one of the hot of the mechanism fields. While whether the parallel mechanism can realize decouple is the premise for synthesis and analysis of the parallel mechanism. Based on screw theory, the existence of the three degrees of freedom (3-DoF) rotational fully-decoupled parallel mechanism is distinguished. Then taking the 6-PUS/UPU parallel mechanism as example, the rotation angles of the moving platform are measured, which is verified the impossibility of the 3-DoF rotation decoupling. The contents of this paper should possess theoretical significance for the innovative configuration synthesis and structure design of rotational decoupled parallel mechanism.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

1951-1955

Citation:

Online since:

January 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] L.N. Sun, Y. Liu and Y.H. Zhu: China Mechanical Engineering Vol. 14 (2003), pp.831-833.

Google Scholar

[2] Q.C. Li, C.Y. Wu, W.P. Shen, X.D. Hu, Z.C. Zhu and Z. Huang: Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering Vol. 42 (2006), pp.44-48.

Google Scholar

[3] D.X. Zeng, Y.L. Hou, W.J. Lu and Z. Huang: Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering Vol. 23 (2010), pp.468-476.

Google Scholar

[4] F. Gao: Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering Vol. 41 (2005), pp.3-17.

Google Scholar

[5] G. Gogu: European Journal of Mechanics A/Solids Vol. 23 (2004), pp.1021-1039.

Google Scholar

[6] X.W. Kong and C.M. Gosselin: Transactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical Engineering Vol. 28 (2004), pp.185-196.

Google Scholar

[7] J.L. Gong, Y.F. Zhang and F. Gao: China Mechanical Engineering Vol. 17 (2006), pp.1509-1512.

Google Scholar

[8] L.B. Hang, Y. Wang, J. Wu, Q. Jin and T.L. Yang: Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering Vol. 41 (2005), pp.28-32.

Google Scholar

[9] M. Carricato, V. Parenti-Castelli: International Journal of Robotics Research Vol. 23 (2004), pp.661-667.

Google Scholar

[10] G. Gogu: IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (2005), pp.4014-4019.

Google Scholar

[11] X.P. Wang, Y.F. Dai and S.Y. Li: Journal of National University of Defense Technology Vol. 24 (2002), pp.85-90.

Google Scholar

[12] F. Zhang, J.G. Yang, B.Z. Li and D. Zhang: China Mechanical Engineering Vol. 19 (2008), pp.1552-1555.

Google Scholar

[13] Z.H. Xu, F. Zhang and Y. Liu: Journal of Machine Design Vol. 26 (2009), pp.47-49.

Google Scholar

[14] D.X. Zeng and Z. Huang: Sci. China Tech Sci. Vol. 54 (2011), pp.998-1004.

Google Scholar

[15] Z. Huang, Y.S. Zhao and T.S. Zhao: Advanced Spatial Mechanism (China Higher Education Press, Beijing 2006).

Google Scholar

[16] Y.S. Zhao, Y.B. Duan, S.P. Liang, Y.C. Dou and D.X. Zeng: International Conference on Computer, Mechatronics, Control and Electronic Engineering (2010), pp.376-381.

Google Scholar