Nodal Evolutionary Computation Enhanced Level Set Algorithm for Structural Topology Optimization

Article Preview

Abstract:

This paper proposes an improved computational algorithm for structure topology optimization. It integrates the merits of Evolutionary Structure Optimization and Level Set Method (LSM) for structure topology optimization. Traditional LSM algorithm has some drawbacks, for instance, its optimal topology configuration is largely dependent on the structural topology initialization. Additionally, new holes cannot be evolved within the updated topology during the optimization iteration. The method proposed in this paper combines the merits of ESO techniques with the LSM scheme, allowing new holes to be automatically inserted in regions with low deformation energy at prescribed iterations of the optimization. The nodal neighboring region is a good selection. For complex structures in which holes cannot be properly inserted in advance, the proposed method considerably improves the ability of LSM to search the optimal topology. In addition to achieving more accurate results, the proposed method also yields higher efficiency during optimization. Benchmark problems are presented to show the effectiveness and robustness of the new proposed algorithm.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

337-342

Citation:

Online since:

August 2010

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2010 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Xie Y. M., Steven G. P., Evolutionary structural optimization. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, German, (1997).

Google Scholar

[2] John. H. Holland, Adaptation in nature and artificial system: an introductory analysis with applications to biology, control, and artificial intelligence. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, (1975).

Google Scholar

[3] M. P. Bendsøe, Optimal shape design as a material distribution problem, Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, Vol. 1(1989), p.193.

DOI: 10.1007/bf01650949

Google Scholar

[4] Eschenauer H. A., Olhoff N., Topology optimization of continuum structures: a review, Applied Mechanics Review, Vol. 54(2001), p.331.

DOI: 10.1115/1.1388075

Google Scholar

[5] Bendsoe M. P., Kikuchi N., Generating optimal topologies in structural design using a homogenization method, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, Vol. 71(1988), p.197.

DOI: 10.1016/0045-7825(88)90086-2

Google Scholar

[6] Makoto Ohsaki, Simultaneous optimization of topology and geometry of a regular plane truss, Computers and Structures, Vol. 66(1998), p.69.

DOI: 10.1016/s0045-7949(97)00050-3

Google Scholar

[7] Chyi-Yeu Lin, Shin-Hong Lin, Artificial neural network based hole image interpretation techniques for integrated topology and shape optimization, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, Vol. 194(2005), p.3817.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2004.09.005

Google Scholar

[8] Mehrdad Salami, Tim Hendtlass, A fast evaluation strategy for evolutionary algorithms, Applied Soft Computing, Vol. 2(2003), p.156.

DOI: 10.1016/s1568-4946(02)00067-4

Google Scholar

[9] Soon Yu Woon, Liyong Tong, Osvaldo M. Querin and Grant P. Steven, Effective optimization of continuum topologies through a multi-GA system, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, Vol. 194(2005), p.3416.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2004.12.025

Google Scholar

[10] X.Y. Yang, Y.M. Xie and G.P. Steven, Evolutionary methods for topology optimization of continuous structures with design dependent loads, Computers and Structures, Vol. 83(2005), p.956.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruc.2004.10.011

Google Scholar

[11] Y. M. Xie, G. P. Steven, A simple evolutionary procedure for structure optimization, Computers and Structures, Vol. 49(1993), p.885.

DOI: 10.1016/0045-7949(93)90035-c

Google Scholar

[12] G. P. Steven, Q. Li, Y. M. Xie, Multi-criteria optimization that minimizes maximum stress and maximizes stiffness, Computers and Structures, Vol. 80(2002), p.2433.

DOI: 10.1016/s0045-7949(02)00235-3

Google Scholar

[13] G. Marckmann P. Bettess and B. Peseux, Self designing structures: a new evolutionary rule for thickness distribution in 2D problems, Communications in Numerical Methods in Engineering, Vol. 18(2002), p.743.

DOI: 10.1002/cnm.534

Google Scholar

[14] H. A. Eschenauer, H. A. Kobelev, A. schumacher, Bubble method for topology and shape optimization of structures, Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, Vol. 8(1994), p.142.

DOI: 10.1007/bf01742933

Google Scholar

[15] Stanley Osher, and Ronald P., Fedkiwy, Level set methods: an overview and some recent results, Journal of Computational Physics, Vol. 169(2001), p.463.

DOI: 10.1006/jcph.2000.6636

Google Scholar

[16] J. A. Sethian, Level set methods and fast marching methods evolving interfaces in computational geometry, fluid mechanics, computer vision, and materials science, Cambridge University Press, (1999).

DOI: 10.1016/s0997-7546(00)01096-7

Google Scholar

[17] Stanley J. Osher, Ronald P., Fedkiw. Level set methods and dynamic implicit surfaces,Springer-Verlag, (2000).

Google Scholar

[18] Stanley Osher, J. A. Sethian, Fronts propagating with curvature-dependent speed: algorithm based on hamilton-jacobi formulations, Journal of Computational Physics, Vol. 79(1988), p.12.

DOI: 10.1016/0021-9991(88)90002-2

Google Scholar

[19] J. A. Sethian and Andreas Wiegmann, Structural boundary design via level set and immersed interface methods, Journal of Computational Physics, Vol. 163(2000), p.489.

DOI: 10.1006/jcph.2000.6581

Google Scholar

[20] Stanley J. Osher, Fadil Santosay, Level set methods for optimization problems involving geometry and constraints, Journal of Computational Physics, Vol. 171(2001), p.272.

DOI: 10.1006/jcph.2001.6789

Google Scholar

[21] Michael Yu Wang, Xiaoming Wang, Dongming Guo, A level set method for structural topology optimization, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, Vol. 192(2003), p.227.

DOI: 10.1016/s0045-7825(02)00559-5

Google Scholar

[22] G. Allaire, F. Jouve, A level-set method for vibration and multiple loads structural optimization, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, Vol. 194(2005), p.3269.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2004.12.018

Google Scholar

[23] A. Rietz, Sufficiency of a finite exponent in SIMP (power law) methods, Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, Vol. 21(2001), pp.159-163.

DOI: 10.1007/s001580050180

Google Scholar

[24] C. Y. Lin, L. S. Chao, Automated image interpretation for integrated topology and shape optimization, Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, Vol. 1(2000), p.125.

DOI: 10.1007/s001580050144

Google Scholar