An Experiment Based Reach Model for Fighter Cockpit Design

Article Preview

Abstract:

Reach envelope is one of the design tools to ensure industrial workspace accommodates users. As for fighter pilots, their reach capability must be considered during the design of cockpit. Normally fighter seat back rest angle is between 13°and 30°, and due to the fact that postural change affects the reach capability of the pilot, the reach envelope can be different under different seat backrest angle, which is normally ill considered and thus limits the cockpit design. This research employed a reach envelope transformation model based on the anthropometric measurement approach to transform experiment based reach envelope at 0° of back rest angle to that at other seat back rest angles. 12 male subjects’ Reach data under 4 different seat angles and other anthropometric data were collected using motion capture system with a sample rate of 120Hz. A simplified model of human body was introduced and modified using the captured data from 4 subjects, with which other subject’s reach points at 0° seat backrest angle were transformed to reach points at other seat backrest angles. Comparison between the transformed envelope and measured reach envelope indicated that the average of difference, SD of difference was -5.5 and 42.76(mm) respectively.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

853-859

Citation:

Online since:

February 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] J.W. Kozey, B. Das,. Determination of the normal and maximum reach measures of adult wheelchair users. Inte. J. of I. Ergon. 33 (2004) 205-213.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ergon.2003.05.001

Google Scholar

[2] W.E. Woodson, B. Tillman, P. Tillman, Human factors design handbook: McGraw-Hill, New York . (1992).

Google Scholar

[3] W. Lijing, Y. Xiugan, L. Yinxia, W. Yongqing, Analysis on reach envelop of pilot in cockpit. J. of Beijing Uni. of Aero. and A. 31 (2005), 41-44.

Google Scholar

[4] D.B. Chaffin. On simulating human reach motions for ergonomics analysis. HF and Ergo. In M. 12 (2002) 235–247.

Google Scholar

[5] D.C. Hammond, R.W. Roe. SAE controls reach study (SAE Technical Paper No. 720199). Society of Automotive Engineers. (1972).

DOI: 10.4271/720199

Google Scholar

[6] M.P. Reed, M.B. Parkinson, A.L. Klinkenberger. Assessing the validity of kinematically generated reach envelopes for simulations of vehicle operators. SAE Trans: J. of Passenger Cars-El. and El. Syst. 112 (2003) 693-697.

DOI: 10.4271/2003-01-2216

Google Scholar

[7] J.J. Yang, K. Abdel-Malek, K. Nebel. On the determination of driver reach and barriers. Int. J. of Veh. Design 37(2005) 253–273.

DOI: 10.1504/ijvd.2005.006600

Google Scholar

[8] J.J. Yang, K. Abdel-Malek, Human reach envelope and zone differentiation for ergonomic design. HF and Ergon. in M&S Ind. 19(2009) 15-34.

DOI: 10.1002/hfm.20135

Google Scholar

[9] A.K. Sengupta, B. Das, Maximum reach envelope for the seated and standing male and female for industrial workstation design. Ergon. 43(2000) 1390-1404.

DOI: 10.1080/001401300421824

Google Scholar

[10] Human Dimension of Chinese Male Pilot Population. The People's Republic of China Military Standards GJB 4856-2003. (2003).

Google Scholar