Selection of Product Design Configuration for Improved Sustainability Using the Product Sustainability Index (ProdSI) Scoring Method

Article Preview

Abstract:

Generating new variants for design elements of products, structuring them into a complete configuration and evaluating the alternate configurations are essential for product design. Evaluating the likely product configurations in terms of sustainability aspects continues to become a useful aspect of interest to product designers. This paper proposes a new approach for applying the Product Sustainability Index (ProdSI) in selecting the best possible configurations for product design. In this paper, the recently developed ProdSI methodology is used to evaluate sustainability performance of a product. The approach is useful for product designers to generate numerous likely product design configurations and subsequently select the most sustainable product design configuration. An example of an armed-chair is used to illustrate the proposed new approach.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

51-56

Citation:

Online since:

April 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] C. Vezzoli, E. Manzini, Design for Environmental Sustainability, Springer, London, (2008).

Google Scholar

[2] D. Maxwell, R. van der Vorst, Developing sustainable products and services, Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 11 (2003) 883-895.

DOI: 10.1016/s0959-6526(02)00164-6

Google Scholar

[3] J. Fiksel, Achieving Eco-Efficiency through Design for Environment, Total Quality Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, Inc. (1996) 47-54.

DOI: 10.1002/tqem.3310050407

Google Scholar

[4] J. Fiksel, J. McDaniel, D. Spitzley, Measuring product sustainability, Journal of Sustainable Product Design. (1998) 7-16.

Google Scholar

[5] I.S. Jawahir, K.E. Rouch, O.W. Dillon, Jr., K.J. Joshi, A. Venkatachalam, I.H. Jaafar, Total life-cyle considerations in product design for sustainability: A framework for comprehensive evaluation (Keynote paper), Proc. TMT 2006, Lloret de Mar, Barcelona, Spain. (2006).

Google Scholar

[6] B.V. Chowdary, A. Gittens, Design development through an integrated approach: a case study of battery-operated passenger cart, Int. J. Product Development. 5 (2008) 188-198.

DOI: 10.1504/ijpd.2008.016377

Google Scholar

[7] S. Vinodh, Environmental conscious product design using CAD and CAE, Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy. 13 (2011) 359-367.

DOI: 10.1007/s10098-010-0310-8

Google Scholar

[8] S. Vinodh, Sustainable design of sprocket using CAD and Design Optimisation, Environment, Development and Sustainability. 13 (2011) 939-951.

DOI: 10.1007/s10668-011-9299-3

Google Scholar

[9] I.S. Jawahir, P.C. Wanigarathne, New challenges in developing science-based sustainability principles for next generation product design and manufacture (Keynote Paper), Proceedings of TMT, Neum, Bosnia and Herzegovina. (2004) 1-10.

Google Scholar

[10] N. de Silva, I.S. Jawahir, O.W. Dillon, Jr. and M. Russell, A new comprehensive methodology for the evaluation of product sustainability at the design and development stage of consumer electronic products, Int. J. Sustainable Manufacturing, Vol. 1(3) (2009).

DOI: 10.1504/ijsm.2009.023973

Google Scholar

[11] A. Gupta, R. Vangari, A.D. Jayal, I.S. Jawahir, Priority evaluation of product metrics for sustainable manufacturing, Proceedings of the 20th CIRP Design Conference, Nantes, France. (2010) 631-641.

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-15973-2_63

Google Scholar

[12] X. Zhang, T. Lu, M. Shuib, G. Rotella, A. Huang, S.C. Feng, K. Rouch, F. Badurdeen, I.S. Jawahir, A metrics-based methodology for establishing Product Sustainability Index (ProdSI) for manufactured products, Proceedings of the 19th CIRP International Conference on Life Cycle Engineering, Berkeley, CA, USA, (2012).

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-29069-5_74

Google Scholar