Game Analysis of the Adverse Selection Formation Mechanism on Engineering Quality Risk Based on Information Asymmetry

Article Preview

Abstract:

The paper makes a deep analysis of the adverse selection formation mechanism under the condition of information asymmetry through the establishment of adverse selection game model in construction market. The paper seeks the root of the construction market risk based on the perspective of information economics. Due to asymmetric information, the adverse selection makes the low strength level engineering quality responsible units expel the high strength level engineering quality responsible units form the construction market , and greatly increases the risk of the construction market, which will make it difficult for construction engineering quality to be guaranteed, and lead to engineering project quality risk. The paper puts forward some effective countermeasures and suggestions to avoid construction market quality risk from both sides of the construction information symmetry angle.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

334-337

Citation:

Online since:

June 2013

Authors:

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Akerlof, George A. The Market for a "Lemons": Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism. Quarterly Journal of Economics, (1970), Vol.84, Aug. 488~500.

DOI: 10.2307/1879431

Google Scholar

[2] Joseph E. Stiglitz and Andrew Murray Weiss. Credit rationing in markets with imperfect information. American Economic Review, 1981(71), pp.393-410.

Google Scholar

[3] Michael Spence. Market Signaling: The Informational Structure of Job Markets and Related Phenomena. Ph D thesis, Harvard University Press, 1972.

Google Scholar

[4] Joseph E. Stiglitz and Michael Rothschild. Equilibrium in Competitive Insurance Markets: An Essay on the Economics of Imperfect Information. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1976:629–649.

DOI: 10.2307/1885326

Google Scholar

[5] Chiappori P.A, Jullien B, Salanie B. Asymmetric Information in Insurance: Some Testable Implications.[CREST Working Paper], www.sre.uehieago.edu, 2002.

Google Scholar

[6] Baron D P, Myerson R B. Regulating a Monopolist with Unknown Costs. Econometrica, 1982, 50(4): 911~930.

DOI: 10.2307/1912769

Google Scholar

[7] Laffont J, Tirole J. A Theory of Incentives in Procurement and Regulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1993.

Google Scholar

[8] Zhang weiying. Game Theory and Information Economics. Shanghai: Shanghai Joint Publishing\ Shanghai People's Publishing House, 1996.

Google Scholar