Critical Issues for Implementing DB Projects in Taiwan

Article Preview

Abstract:

Even though the design-build (DB) delivery method has become a popular construction project delivery method in many countries, it is relatively rare in Taiwan. This study investigates the problems and difficulties that Taiwanese owners may encounter during using DB delivery methods. Twenty six problems over the four key stages of the DB process were first identified based on previous studies and expert interviews. A questionnaire survey was then conducted to determine the most pressing problems for Taiwan. The results of statistical analyses show that Taiwanese owners face key problems at all stages of the DB delivery method, especially during the tender preparation and valuation stages. These findings can be used by Taiwanese owners for successfully executing DB projects.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

2171-2176

Citation:

Online since:

August 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] X. Bo and A. Chan, Investigation of barriers to entry into the design-build market in the people's republic of China: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 138 (2012), 120-127.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)co.1943-7862.0000387

Google Scholar

[2] F.Y.Y. Ling and M. Liu, Using neural network to predict performance of design-build projects in Singapore: Building and Environment, Vol. 39 (2004), 1263-1274.

DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2004.02.008

Google Scholar

[3] M. Park, S. -H. Ji, H. -S. Lee and W. -Y. Kim, Strategies for design-build in Korea using system dynamics modeling: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 135 (2009), 1125-1137.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)co.1943-7862.0000095

Google Scholar

[4] R. Perkins, Sources of changes in design–build contracts for a governmental owner: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 135 (2009), 588-593.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9364(2009)135:7(588)

Google Scholar

[5] D.R. Hale, P.P. Shrestha, G.E. Gibson Jr. and G.C. Migliaccio, Empirical comparison of design/build and design/bid/build project delivery methods: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 135 (2009), 579-587.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)co.1943-7862.0000017

Google Scholar

[6] Z. Satterfield, Design-build: The National Environmental Services Center, Vol. 9 (2009), 1-4.

Google Scholar

[7] A.S. Chang, F. -Y. Shen and W. Ibbs, Design and construction coordination problems and planning for design–build project new users: Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, Vol. 37 (2010), 1525-1534.

DOI: 10.1139/l10-090

Google Scholar

[8] Public Construction Commission Executive Yuan (2012) on http: /www. pcc. gov. tw/pccap2/BIZSfront/NewsContent. do?site=002&bid=BIZS_C10109352.

Google Scholar

[9] F.Y.Y. Ling and B.H.M. Poh, Problems encountered by owners of design–build projects in Singapore: International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 26 (2008), 164-173.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2007.04.001

Google Scholar

[10] J.R.A. Sanotos, Cronbach's alpha: a tool for assessing the reliability of scales: Journal of Extension, Vol. 37 (1999), 1–5.

Google Scholar

[11] D.W.M. Chan, A.P.C. Chan, P.T.I. Lam and J.M.W. Wong, An empirical survey of the motives and benefits of adopting guaranteed maximum price and target cost contracts in construction: International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 29 (2011).

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2010.04.002

Google Scholar

[12] A. Field, Discovering statistics, using SPSS for windows, Sage Publications, London, (2005).

Google Scholar

[13] Nunnally, J.C., Psychometric theory. second ed., McGraw-Hill series in psychology, New York, McGraw-Hill. xv, 1978, p.701.

Google Scholar

[14] M. -Y. Cheng and M. -H. Tsai. Cross-organization process integration in design–build team: Automation in Construction, Vol. 17 (2008), 151-162.

DOI: 10.1016/j.autcon.2006.12.002

Google Scholar