Some Properties of Mathematical Model for Cylindricity Errors

Article Preview

Abstract:

An unconstrained optimization model, applicable to radial deviation measurement, is established for assessing cylindricity errors by the minimum circumscribed cylinder evaluation. The properties of the objective function in the optimization model are thoroughly investigated. On the basis of the modern theory of convex functions, it is strictly proved that the objective function is a continuous and non-differentiable and convex function defined on the four-dimensional Euclidean space R4. Therefore, the minimal value of the objective function is unique and any of its minimal point must be its global minimal point. Thus, any existing optimization algorithm, so long as it is convergent, can be used to solve the objective function to get the wanted values of cylindricity errors by the minimum circumscribed cylinder assessment. An example is given to verify the theoretical results presented.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

1214-1218

Citation:

Online since:

November 2010

Authors:

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2010 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Y.J. Fan and Z.X. Zhao: Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering, Vol. 30 (1994) No. 2, pp.19-24. (In Chinese).

Google Scholar

[2] Z. He, J.W. Liang and X.Z. Liu: Journal of Tsinghua University, Vol. 29 (1989) No. 5, pp.54-58. (In Chinese).

Google Scholar

[3] Z. He and J.W. Liang: Chinese Journal of Metrology, Vol. 17 (1996) No. 3, pp.219-221. (In Chinese).

Google Scholar

[4] U. Roy and X. Zhang: Computer-Aided Design, Vol. 24 (1992) No. 3, pp.161-168.

Google Scholar

[5] S. T. Huang, K. C. Fan and J. H. Wu: Precision Engineering, Vol. 15 (1993) No. 3, pp.158-165.

Google Scholar

[6] P. Liu: Chinese Journal of Scientific Instrument, Vol. 10 (1989) No. 4, pp.422-428. (In Chinese).

Google Scholar

[7] S.H. Cheraghi, H.S. Lim and S. Motavalli: Precision Engineering, Vol. 18 (1996) No. 1, pp.30-37.

Google Scholar

[8] J.B. Gao, Y.X. Chu and Z.X. Li: Precision Engineering, Vol. 23 (1999) No. 2, pp.79-93.

Google Scholar

[9] J. Huang: Precision Engineering, Vol. 25 (2001) No. 7, pp.301-308.

Google Scholar

[10] L.M. Zhu, H. Ding and Y.L. Xiong: Computer-Aided Design, Vol. 35 (2003) No. 5, pp.255-265.

Google Scholar

[11] P. Liu: Chinese Journal of Metrology, Vol. 24 (2003) No. 2, pp.85-87. (In Chinese).

Google Scholar

[12] P. Liu and S. Wang: Proc. Third International Symposium on Precision Mechanical Measurement (Urumqi, China, August 2-6, 2006), Vol. 6280, pp. 62802R-1-62802R-7.

Google Scholar

[13] P. Liu: Proc. 4th International Symposium on Instrumentation Science and Technology (Harbin, China, August 8-12, 2006), pp.170-174.

Google Scholar

[14] P. Liu and S.Y. Liu: Applied Mechanics and Materials, Vol. 16-19 (2009), pp.1164-1168.

Google Scholar

[15] M. Avriel: Nonlinear Programming: Analysis and Methods ( Dover Publications, Inc., USA 2003).

Google Scholar