Design of Encoder and Decoder for Q-Ary LDPC Codes Based on FPGA

Article Preview

Abstract:

The scheme of FPGA hardware implementation based on the RA structure of encoder for q-ary LDPC codes as well as the Max-log-BP decoding are designed emphasisly. Form the performance, speed, and resource consumption situation of coder and decoder, this scheme based on FPGA can meet the requirements of the most of communication systems.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

1282-1287

Citation:

Online since:

August 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] CHUNGSY, FORNEY JGD, RICHARDSONT etal. On the design of low-density parity-check codes within 0. 0045dB of the Shannon limit [J]. IEEE Communication Letter, 2001, 5(2): 58–60.

DOI: 10.1109/4234.905935

Google Scholar

[2] BAO Jie, MA Long, WANG lin. Performance Analysis of High-rate Non-binary LDPC Codes Under AWGN Channels [J]. Journal of Chongqing University(Natural Science Edition), Aug 2007, vol. 30, no. 8, pp.40-43.

Google Scholar

[3] H. Song, J.R. Cruz. Reduced-complexity decoding of q-ary LDPC codes for magnetic recording [J]. IEEE Trans.Magn., Mar. 2003, vol. 39, no. 2: 1081-1087.

DOI: 10.1109/tmag.2003.808600

Google Scholar

[4] TIAN Yun, XUN Wen-bo, HU Bin. Xilinx ISE Design Suite 10. x FPGA Design Guide[M]. Bei jing: POSTS and TELECOM PRESS, 2008. 11.

Google Scholar

[5] SHI Zhi-ping. Nobinary Low-Density Parity-Check Codes and Their Applications in Wireless Communications[M]. Beijing: National Defense Industry Press, 2012. 1.

Google Scholar

[6] WYMEERSCH H, STEENDAM H, MOENECLAEY M. Log-domain decoding of LDPC codes over GF (q): proc. IEEE ICC2004[C]. Paris, France: [s. n. ], 2004: 772–776.

DOI: 10.1109/icc.2004.1312606

Google Scholar

[7] Lin Jun, Sha Jin, Wang Zhong feng, and Li Li. An efficient VLSIarchitecture for nonbinary LDPC decoders [J]. IEEE Trans on Circuits and Systems, Jan. 2010, vol. 57, no. 1: 51-55.

DOI: 10.1109/tcsii.2009.2036542

Google Scholar