The Use of TiAlN Coated Carbide Tool when Finish Drilling of Stainless Steel X4Cr17Ni8TiN

Abstract:

In this paper presents the conclusions of machinability tests on a new stainless steel X4Cr17Ni8TiN, which applicated in food processing industry, and describes important concurrent parameters for the cutting zone during the process of finish drilling. This paper presents the results of experiments that concerned the verification of temperature fields in tool and the machined surface by drilling of stainless steels X4Cr17Ni8TiN. The content of this paper also focuses on the analysis of selected domains through basic indicators of steel machinability: cutting edge tool life, surface roughness, and wear mechanisms. The machinability of stainless steels is examined based on the cutting tests. The effect of cutting speed are analysed by tool wear mechanisms, and temperature tool. Based on the cutting tests, cutting speeds of 40 to 80 m/min, feed rate of 0.04 to 0.1 mm per rev.and solid a new design of screw drill from sintered carbide with hydraulic holder. Diameter of screw drill is 5.5 mm. Tool wear criterion of VBK value 0.12 mm. Wear mechanisms analysed by Semi Electron Microscopy (SEM).

• Periodical: Applied Mechanics and Materials (Volume 39)
• Pages: 369-374
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.39.369
• Online since: November 2010
• Authors: Jozef Jurko
• Keywords: Coated Carbide, Finish Drilling, Hardening, Surface Roughness (SR), Wear Mechanism

References

[1] H. Chandrasekaran, J. Johansson: Chip Flow and Notch Wear Mechanisms during the Machining of High Austenitic Stainless Steels. Annals of the CIRP 43 1, (1994) pp.101-105.

DOI: 10.1016/s0007-8506(07)62174-x

[2] S, Chick, M.B. Mendel: Using Wear Curves to Predict the Cost of Changes in Cutting Conditions. Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering. Transactions of the ASME 120 (1998), pp.166-168.

DOI: 10.1115/1.2830094

[3] X.D. Fang: Experimental investigation of overall machining performance with overall progressive tool wear at different tool faces, Wear, Vol. 173, (1994), p.171–178.

DOI: 10.1016/0043-1648(94)90270-4

[4] T. Fujiwara, T. Kato, S. Abeyama, S. Nakamura: Effects of Free-Machining Additives on Machinability of the 18Cr-2Mo Stainless Steel. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Influence of Metallurgy on Machinability of Steel, 26. -28. September, Tokyo, (1977).

[5] W. Grzesik, T. Wanat: Comparative assessment of surface roughness produced by hard machining with mixed ceramic tools including 2D and 3D analysis. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, Vol. 169, No. 3, (2005), pp.364-371.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.04.080

[6] J. Jurko, A. Panda, M. Gajdoš: Accompanying phenomena in the cutting zone machinability during turning of stainless steels. International Journal Machining and Machinability of Materials, Vol. 5, No. 4, (2009), pp.383-400.

DOI: 10.1504/ijmmm.2009.026899

[7] J. Jurko: Monitoring and Diagnosis of Drill Wear and the Thermodynamic Phenomenas of Material Removal by drilling of Stainless Steels. Book: Experimental Analysis of Nano and Engineering Materials and Structures. (2007), pp.77-78.

DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4020-6239-1_37

[8] J. Jurko: Verification of cutting zone machinability during drilling of austenitic stainless steels, in ICEM 2008: International Conference on Experimental Mechanics, Proceedings of SPIE Vol. 7375-1H, (2009), pp.367-378.

DOI: 10.1117/12.839061

[9] V.C. Venkatesh: Tool wear investigations on some cutting tool materials, Journal of Lubrication Technology, Vol. 102, (1980), p.556–559.

DOI: 10.1115/1.3251595

[10] D. Wei Yen, P.K. Wright: A Remote Temperature Sensing Technique for Estimating the Cutting Interface Temperature. Journal of Engineering for Industry. Transaction of the ASME, 113, (1986), pp.251-264.

DOI: 10.1115/1.3187075