Effect on Deformation in Hydroforming under Different Forming-Control Paths

Abstract:

Weight reduction and the structural strengthening of frameworks have always been of great interest for automobile and bicycle manufacturers. In order to achieve this goal, manufacturers have always been looking for new materials and their corresponding processing technology. This paper focuses on investigating the most suitable forming-control path pattern for manufacturing magnesium-based alloy quadrilateral tubular components using the tube-hydroforming (THF) process for framework components. Conventionally, there are three usual patterns of forming-control path. Through numerical simulation, it was found that forming-control path C provided the best profile results. The simulation results were also verified by physical THF experiments which were carried out at around 270oC to fabricate the quadrilateral tubular component. A good agreement between simulation and experimental result was achieved, indicating that employing forming-control path C in the actual THF process provides the best forming results, minimizing the occurrence of wrinkling. The formability of such high value-added hydroformed tubular components can be predicted. Trial-and-error during the design stage can be avoided, which contributes to lower production costs.

• Periodical: Applied Mechanics and Materials (Volume 440)
• Pages: 165-170
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.440.165
• Online since: October 2013
• Authors: Wai Kei Ricky Kot*, Luen Chow Chan
• Keywords: Finite Element Analysis (FEA), Forming-Control Path, Magnesium-Based Alloy, Tube Hydroforming

References

[1] Liu, T. J. C., and Wu, H. C., 2010, Fiber direction and stacking sequence design for bicycle frame made of carbon/epoxy composite laminate, Mater. Design, 31, p.1971–(1980).

DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2009.10.036

[2] Hwang, Y. M., Wang, K. H., and Kang, N. S., 2011, T-shape tube hydroforming of magnesium alloys with different outlet diameters, J. Manuf. Sci. E-T ASME, 133, p.061012.

DOI: 10.1115/1.4004851

[3] Kim, J., Lei, L. P., Hwang, S. M., Kang, S. J., and Kang, B. S., 2002, Manufacture of an automobile lower arm by hydroforming, Int. J. Mach. Tool. Manu., 42(1), pp.69-78.

DOI: 10.1016/s0890-6955(01)00087-6

[4] Koc, M., and Altan, T., 2001, An overall review of the tube hydroforming (THF) technology, J. Mater. Process. Tech., 108(3), pp.384-393.

DOI: 10.1016/s0924-0136(00)00830-x

[5] He, Z. B., Liu, G. J. Wu, S. J., and Yuan, Y. C., 2008, Liang, Mechanical property and formability of AZ31B extruded tube at elevated temperature, Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China, 18, pp. S209-S213.

DOI: 10.1016/s1003-6326(10)60204-x

[6] Kim, H. Choi, S., Lee, K., and Kim, H., 2008, Experimental determination of forming limit diagram and springback characteristics of AZ31B Mg alloy sheets at elevated temperatures, Mater. Trans., 49(5), pp.1112-1119.

DOI: 10.2320/matertrans.mc200778

[7] Manabe, K. I., Suetake, M., Koyama, H., and Yang, M., 2006, Hydroforming process optimization of aluminum alloy tube using intelligent control technique, Int. J. Mach. Tools. Manuf., 46(11) pp.1207-1211.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2006.01.028

[8] Aydemir, A., De Vree, J. H. P., Brekelmans, W. A. M., Geers, Sillekens, W. H., and Werkhoven, R. J., 2005, An adaptive simulation approach designed for tube hydroforming processes, J. Mater. Process. Tech., 159(3), pp.303-310.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.05.018

[9] Crapps, J. Fang, H., and Horstemeyer, M. F., 2006, Numerical simulation and optimization of a tee shaped tube hydroforming process, Proceeding of the. MSEC2006 ASME 2006, Manufacturing Science and Engineering, Parts A and B, USA.

DOI: 10.1115/msec2006-21055

[10] Elisabetta, A., Francesca, C., and Edoardo, M., 2007, A computer-aided design module to analyze manufacturing configurations of bent and hydroformed tubes, J. Manuf. Sci. E-T ASME, 129, pp.979-983.

DOI: 10.1115/1.2752522