[1]
Klyne G, Carroll J J, McBride B. Resource description ramework(RDF): Conceptes and abstract syntax, W3C recommendation. World Wide Web Consortium(W3C), (2004).
Google Scholar
[2]
Prud'hommeaux E, Seaborne A . SPARQL query language for RDF. W3C rendatiom Wom Wide Web ConsortiLlln(W3C), (2008).
Google Scholar
[3]
Udrea O, Pugliese A, Subrahmanian VS. Grin: A graph based RDF index. In: Holte RC, ed. Proc. of the 23rd AAAI Conf. on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI 2007). Vancouver: AAAI Press, 2007. 1465−1470.
Google Scholar
[4]
Zou L, Mo J, Chen L, et al. gStore: answering SPARQL queries via subgraph matching[J]. Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment, 2011, 4(8): 482-493.
DOI: 10.14778/2002974.2002976
Google Scholar
[5]
Lu Bin, Du Xiaoyong, and Wang Yan. SPARQL Query Optimization Based on Property Correlations [J]. Journal of Computer Research and Development, 2009, 46: 119-125.
Google Scholar
[6]
Query S. SPARQL Query Optimization Based on Dynamic Schema Structure[J]. Journal of Computer Research and Development, 2010, 47: 43-47.
Google Scholar
[7]
Ye Y X, Ouyang D T. Optimize SPARQL by combining semantic reduction and selectivity estimation[J]. Dianzi Xuebao(Acta Electronica Sinica), 2010, 38(5): 1205-1210.
Google Scholar
[8]
White T. Hadoop: the definitive guide[M]. O'Reilly, (2012).
Google Scholar
[9]
Borthakur D. HDFS architecture guide[J]. Hadoop Apache Project. http: /hadoop. apache. org/common/docs/current/hdfs_design. pdf, (2008).
Google Scholar
[10]
Guo Y, Pan Z, Heflin J. LUBM: A benchmark for OWL knowledge base systems[J]. Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web, 2005, 3(2): 158-182.
DOI: 10.1016/j.websem.2005.06.005
Google Scholar