Simulation of Water Droplet Merging under Shock Wave Using Real Ghost Fluid Method

Article Preview

Abstract:

This paper presents a 3D numerical simulation of water droplets merging under a given shock wave. We couple interpolation method to RGFM (Real Ghost Fluid Method) to improve the numerical accuracy of RGFM. The flow states of air-water interface are calculated by ARPS (approximate Riemann problem solver). Flow field is solved by Euler equation with fifth-order WENO spatial discretization and fourth-order R-K (Runge-Kutta) time discretization. We also employ fifth-order HJ-WENO to discretize level set equation to keep track of gas-liquid interface. Numerical results demonstrate that droplets shape has little change before merging and the merged droplet gradually becomes umbrella-shaped under the given shock wave. We verify that combination of RGFM with interpolation method has the property of reducing numerical error by comparing to the results without employment of interpolation method.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

628-632

Citation:

Online since:

October 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] S. Hartl, B. Yang, S.A.K. Jeelani, Dimple formation in the thin film beneath a drop or bubble approaching a plane surface, Chemical Engineering Science 49 (1994) 1313-1322.

DOI: 10.1016/0009-2509(93)e0006-x

Google Scholar

[2] E. Klaseboer, J. Chevaillier, C. Gourdon et al, Film drainage between colliding drops at constant approach velocity: experiments and modeling, Journal of Colloid Interface Science 229 (2000) 274-285.

DOI: 10.1006/jcis.2000.6987

Google Scholar

[3] W. Bouwhuis, R. C.A. van der Veen, T. Tran et al, Maximal air bubble entrainment at liquid-drop impact, Physical Review Letters 264501 (2012) 1-4.

DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.109.264501

Google Scholar

[4] R. F. Tabor, C. Wu, F. Grieser et al, Non-linear and cyclical collisions between drops and bubbles: using AFM to understand droplet interactions in micro-scale flows, Soft Matter 9 (2013) 2426-2433.

DOI: 10.1039/c2sm27463a

Google Scholar

[5] C.W. Wang, T.G. Liu, B.C. Khoo, A real ghost fluid method for the simulation of multimedium compressible flow, J. Sci. Comput. 128 (2005) 278-232.

DOI: 10.1137/030601363

Google Scholar

[6] S. Osher, J. A. Sethian, Fronts propagating with curvature-dependent speed: algorithms based on Hamilton-Jacobi formulations, J. Comput. Phys. 79 (1988) 12-49.

DOI: 10.1016/0021-9991(88)90002-2

Google Scholar

[7] M. Sussman, P. Smereka, S. Osher, A level set approach for computing solutions to incompressible two-phase flow, J. Comput. Phys. 114 (1994) 146-159.

DOI: 10.1006/jcph.1994.1155

Google Scholar

[8] T.G. Liu, B.C. Khoo, K.S. Yeo, Ghost fluid method for strong shock impacting on material interface, J. Comput. Phys. 190 (2003) 651-681.

DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9991(03)00301-2

Google Scholar

[9] T. Aslam, A partial differential equation approach to multidimensional extrapolation, J. Comput. Phys. 193 (2004) 349-355.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2003.08.001

Google Scholar

[10] C.W. Shu, Essentially non-oscillatory and weighted essentially non-oscillatory schemes for hyperbolic conservation laws, ICASE Report 97-65. (1997).

DOI: 10.1007/bfb0096355

Google Scholar

[11] C.W. Shu, S. Osher, Efficient implementation of essentially non-oscillatory shock capturing schemes, J. Comput. Phys. 77 (1988) 439-471.

DOI: 10.1016/0021-9991(88)90177-5

Google Scholar

[12] G.S. Jiang, D. Peng. Weighted ENO schemes for Hamilton Jacobi equations, J. Sci. Comput. 21 (2000) 2126-2143.

DOI: 10.1137/s106482759732455x

Google Scholar