Sintering and Performance of MgO from Bischofite with ZrO2 Additive

Article Preview

Abstract:

Effect of ZrO2 on sintering properties of MgO prepared from natural brine from Qarhan Salt Lake, crystalline bischofite and MgCl2·6H2O(AR) was studied. The results showed that ZrO2 of addition exceeded 1 wt% had promotive effect on sintering of magnesia prepared from MgCl2·6H2O(AR). While 1.5 wt% ZrO2 was added, the bulk density of sample was 3.37 g/cm3, and relative density was 94.1%. With 1 wt% ZrO2, the bulk densities of magnesia prepared from crystalline bischofite and brine were 3.10 and 3.27 g/cm3, and the relative densities increased by 10.0% and 19.6%, respectively. The main reasons for promoting MgO sintering with ZrO2 were that monoclinic phase ZrO2 converted to cubic phase Zr2O and excess ZrO2 reacted with MgO to generate Mg0.13Zr0.87O1.87, which activated lattice and promoted the diffusion of ions during sintering process. In addition, liquid phase sintering was also one of the main reasons for promoting the sintering of brine magnesia.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

11-17

Citation:

Online since:

November 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] V. Martinac, M. Labor and N. Petric: Mater. Chem. Phys. Vol. 46 (1996), p.23.

Google Scholar

[2] Y.B. Lee, H.C. Park and K. D Oh: J. Mater. Sci. Vol. 33 (1998), p.4321.

Google Scholar

[3] R. Sarkar and G. Bannerjee: J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. Vol. 20 (2000), p.2133.

Google Scholar

[4] S. Maitra, S. Das and A. Sen: Ceram. Int. Vol. 33 (2007), p.239.

Google Scholar

[5] M. Chaudhuri and G. Banerjee: J. Mater. Sci. Vol. 34 (1999), p.5821.

Google Scholar

[6] Y.K. Kalpakli: Refract. Ind. Ceram. Vol. 49 (2008), p.314.

Google Scholar

[7] T. Lucion, P.H. Duvigneaud, A. Laudet, J.F. Stenger and E. Gueguen: Key Eng. Mater. Vol. 264-268 (2004), p.209.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/kem.264-268.209

Google Scholar

[8] N. Petric, V. Martinac, M. Labor and M. Mirošević-Anzulović: Chem. Eng. Technol. Vol. 22 (1999), p.451.

Google Scholar

[9] N. Petric, V. Martinac, M. Labor and M. Mirošević-Anzulović: Mater. Chem. Phys. Vol. 53 (1998), p.83.

Google Scholar

[10] J.W. Nelson and I.B. Cutle: J. Am. Ceram. Soc. Vol. 41 (2006), p.406.

Google Scholar

[11] G.K. Layden and M. C: J. Am. Ceram. Soc. Vol. 42 (1959), p.89.

Google Scholar

[12] B.Q. Han, Y. S Li, C. C Guo and N. Li: Ceram. Int. Vol. 33 (2007), p.1563.

Google Scholar

[13] M. Chen, C.Y. Lu and J. K Yu: Mater. Sci. Forum Vol. 561-565 (2007), p.623.

Google Scholar

[14] Q.Z. Huang, G.M. Lu, J. Wang and J.G. Yu: Metall. Mater. Trans. B Vol. 41 (2010), p.1059.

Google Scholar

[15] Q.Z. Huang, G.M. Lu, J. Wang and J.G. Yu: J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis Vol. 91 (2011), p.159.

Google Scholar