Drag Reduction Study about Bird Feather Herringbone Riblets

Article Preview

Abstract:

Flying bird has gradually formed airworthy structures e.g. streamlined shape and hollow shaft of feather to improve flying performance by millions of years natural selection. As typical property of flight feather, herringbone-type riblets can be observed along the shaft of each feather, which caused by perfect alignment of barbs. Why bird feather have such herringbone-type riblets has not been extensively discussed until now. In this paper, microstructures of secondary feathers are investigated through SEM photo of various birds involving adult pigeons, wild goose and magpie. Their structural parameters of herringbone riblets of secondary flight feather are statistically obtained. Based on quantitative analysis of feathers structure, one novel biomimetic herringbone riblets with narrow smooth edge are proposed to reduce surface drag. In comparison with traditional microgroove riblets and other drag reduction structures, the drag reduction rate of the proposed biomimetic herringbone riblets is experimentally clarified up to 15%, much higher than others. Moreover, the drag reduction mechanism of herringbone riblets are also confirmed and exploited by CFD.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

201-205

Citation:

Online since:

November 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] M.J. Walsh, Riblets as a viscous drag reduction technique, AIAA Journal. 21 (1983) 485-486.

DOI: 10.2514/3.60126

Google Scholar

[2] M.J. Walsh, A.M. Lindemann, Optimization and application of riblets for turbulent drag reduction, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. 347 (1984) 1-11.

DOI: 10.2514/6.1984-347

Google Scholar

[3] H. Choi, P. Moin, J. Kim, Direct numerical simulation of turbulent flow over riblets, Journal of Fluid Mechanics. 255 (1993) 503-539.

DOI: 10.1017/s0022112093002575

Google Scholar

[4] D. Brian, B. Bharat, Shark-skin surfaces for fluid-drag reduction in turbulent flow: a review, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A. 368 (2010) 4775-4806.

DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2010.0201

Google Scholar

[5] F.G. Howard, W.L. Goodman. Drag reduction on a bluff body at yaw angles to 30 degrees, Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, 24(1987) 179-181.

DOI: 10.2514/3.25893

Google Scholar

[6] W. Nachtigall, Starlings and Starling Models in Wind Tunnels, Journal of Avian Biology. 29 (1998) 478-484.

DOI: 10.2307/3677167

Google Scholar

[7] G.D. Homberger, K.N.D. Silva, Functional Microanatomy of the Feather-Bearing Integument: Implications for the Evolution of Birds and Avian Flight, Amer. Zool. 40 (2000) 553-57.

DOI: 10.1093/icb/40.4.553

Google Scholar

[8] R. Parfitt Alex, F.V. Vincent Julian, Drag Reduction in a Swimming Humboldt Penguin, Spheniscus Humboldti, when the Boundary Layer is Turbulent, Journal of Bionic Engineering. 2 (2005) 57-62.

DOI: 10.1007/bf03399481

Google Scholar

[9] L.M. Tian, L.Q. Ren, P.Q. Liu, Z.W. Han, X. Jiang, The Mechanism of Drag Reduction around Bodies of Revolution Using Bionic Non-Smooth Surfaces, Journal of Bionic Engineering. 4 (2007) 109–116.

DOI: 10.1016/s1672-6529(07)60022-5

Google Scholar

[10] J.J. Rohr, G.W. Andersen, L.W. Reidy, E.W. Hendricks, A comparison of the drag-reducing benefits of riblets in internal and external flows, In Experiments in fluids. 13 (1992) 361–368.

DOI: 10.1007/bf00223243

Google Scholar

[11] K.N. Liu, D. JOSEPH, O. Riccius, C. Christodoulou, Drag reduction in pipes lined with riblets, In AIAA journal. 28 (1990) 1697–1698.

DOI: 10.2514/3.10459

Google Scholar

[12] D.W. Bechert, M. Bartenwerfer, The viscous flow on surfaces with longitudinal ribs, In Journal of Fluid Mechanics. 206 (1989) 105–129.

DOI: 10.1017/s0022112089002247

Google Scholar

[13] D.W. Bechert, M. Bruse, W. Hage, J.G.T. van der Hoeven, G. Hoppe, Experiments on drag-reducing surfaces and their optimization with an adjustable geometry, In Journal of Fluid Mechanics. 338 (1997) 59–87.

DOI: 10.1017/s0022112096004673

Google Scholar