Hydrostatic Stress and Triaxiality Factors in a Lotus Root Cross Section

Article Preview

Abstract:

Engineers often use nature as an inspiration for generating designs. Plants have optimised their structures over millions of years of evolution. A lotus root, rhizome of Nelumbo Nucifera Gaertn having gas canals was studied in the paper. The lotus root cross section subjected to an external water pressure was analysed and compared with other cross sections including a circular hollow cross section. It was found that the lotus root cross section has more areas containing higher triaxiality factors due to the holes. The hydrostatic stress in the lotus root cross section varies from zero to several times that of the external water pressure. However, the hydrostatic stress in a circular hollow cross section has a constant ratio to the external pressure. The research results show that engineering components with designed multi-holes can affect its failure behaviour. The structure of lotus root may be adopted in the design of engineering materials and structures.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

230-234

Citation:

Online since:

November 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] W.P. Chen and S.M. Zhang, The structure, elongation and thickening of rhizome in Nelumbo Nucifera Gaertn, Acta Botanica Sinica, 31(3) (1989) pp.191-197.

Google Scholar

[2] K.J. Niklas, Mechanical behavior of plant tissues as inferred from the theory of pressurized cellular solids, American Journal of Botany, 76(6) (1989) pp.929-937.

DOI: 10.1002/j.1537-2197.1989.tb15071.x

Google Scholar

[3] L.J. Gibson, The hierarchical structure and mechanics of plant materials, J. of the Royal Society Interface, 9(76) (2012) pp.2749-2766.

DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2012.0341

Google Scholar

[4] P.W. Bridgman, Studies in large plastic flow and fracture: with special emphasis on the effects of hydrostatic pressure, McGraw-Hill (1952).

DOI: 10.1126/science.115.2990.424

Google Scholar

[5] S. Kweon, Damage at negative triaxiality, European Journal of Mechanics A/Solids, 31 (2012) pp.103-212.

Google Scholar

[6] Y. Bao, and T. Wierzbicki, On the cut-off of negative triaxiality for fracture, Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 72 (2005) pp.1049-1069.

DOI: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2004.07.011

Google Scholar

[7] C. Wei, P.M. Lintilhac and J.J. Tanguay, An insight into cell elasticity and load-bearing ability, measurement and theory, Plant Physiology, 126(1) (2001) pp.129-138.

DOI: 10.1104/pp.126.3.1129

Google Scholar

[8] O. Hamza, A.G. Bengough, M.F. Bransby, M.C.R. Davies and P.D. Hallett, Biomechanics of plant roots: estimating localized deformation with particle image velocimetry, Biosystems Eng., 94(1) (2006) pp.119-132.

DOI: 10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2006.02.006

Google Scholar