High-Lift Mechanism of a Bionic Slat

Abstract:

To avoid broadband noise from a slat cove, the deployed slat contour is usually modified by filling cove, but the design is sensitive to aerodynamic performance. In the paper, a bionic slat without a cove is built on the basis of a bionic airfoil (i.e. stowed bionic multi-element airfoil), which is extracted from a long-eared owl wing. The quasi-two-dimensional models with a deployed bionic slat and a stowed bionic slat are manufactured by rapid manufacturing and prototyping system, respectively, and measured in a low-turbulence wind tunnel. The results are used to characterize high-lift effect: the lift coefficients of the model with a stowed slat are larger at less than 4°angle of attack, but the model with a deployed slat has the larger lift coefficients at greater than 4°angle of attack. Furthermore, the deployed bionic slat can increase stall angle and maximum lift coefficient, but also delay the decline of the lift coefficient curve slope meaning that the leading-edge separation is postponed within a certain range of angle of attack. At the same time, the flow field around the models is visualized by smoke wire method. The leading-edge separation of the model with a stowed slat is shown at low Reynolds number and angle of attack. However, the finding does not occur in the flow field of the model with a deployed slat at the same conditions, probably because the gap between the bionic slat and the main wing results in favorable pressure gradient, the deployed bionic slat decreases the peak of adverse pressure gradient by increasing the chord of the bionic multi-element model, and the bionic slat wake excites transition to the boundary layer on upper surface of the main wing. This superiority may be used as reference in the design of the leading-edge slat without a cove.

• Periodical: Applied Mechanics and Materials (Volume 461)
• Pages: 220-229
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.461.220
• Online since: November 2013
• Authors: Chang Jiang Ge, Mei Chen Ge
• Keywords: Alula, Bionic Slat, High-Lift Mechanism, Leading-Edge Separation, Low Reynolds Number

References

[1] J.A. Hayes, W.C. Horne, P.T. Soderman, P.H. Bent, Airframe Noise Characteristics of a 4. 7% Scale DC-10 Model, AIAA Paper. (1997) 97-1594.

DOI: 10.2514/6.1997-1594

[2] P.T. Soderman, F. Kafyeke, J. Boudreau, N.J. Burnside, S.M. Jaeger, R. Chandrasekharan, Airframe noise study of a Bombardier CRJ-700 aircraft model in the NASA Ames 7- by 10-foot wind tunnel, International Journal of Aeroacoustics. 3 (2004) 1-42.

DOI: 10.1260/147547204323022248

[3] L.C. Chow, K. Mau, H. Remy, Landing Gear and High Lift Devices Airframe Noise Research, AIAA Paper. (2002) 2002-2408.

DOI: 10.2514/6.2002-2408

[4] Zhaokai Ma. Slat Noise Attenuation Using Acoustic Liner , AIAA Paper. (2005) 2005-3009.

DOI: 10.2514/6.2005-3009

[5] M.G. Smith, Leung Choi Chow, N. Molin, Attenuation of Slat Trailing Edge Noise Using Slat Gap Acoustic Liners, AIAA Paper. (2006) 2006-2666.

DOI: 10.2514/6.2006-2666

[6] M. Choudhari, M.R. Khorrami, D.P. Lockard. Slat Cove Noise Modeling: A Posteriori Analysis of Unsteady RANS Simulations, AIAA Paper. (2002) 2002 -2468.

DOI: 10.2514/6.2002-2468

[7] K. Takeda, G.B. Ashcroft, X. Zhang, Unsteady Aerodynamics of Slat Cove Flow in a High-Lift Device Configuration, AIAA Paper. (2001) 2001-0706.

DOI: 10.2514/6.2001-706

[8] R.R. Graham, The silent flight of owls, Journal of Royal Aeronautics Society. 38 (1934) 837-843.

[9] G.M. Lilley, A study of the silent flight of the owl, AIAA Paper. (1998) 98-2340.

[10] R.A. Kroeger, H.D. Gruschka, T.C. Helvey, Low speed aerodynamics for ultra-quiet flight, Air Force Flight Dynamics Laboratory Technical Report. (1971) 71-75.

[11] T. Bachmann, S. Klan, W. Baumgartner, M. Klaas, W. Schroder, H. Wagner, Morphometric characterisation of wing feathers of the barn owl Tyto alba pratincola and the pigeon Columba livia, Frontiers in zoology. 4 (2007) 23.

DOI: 10.1186/1742-9994-4-23

[12] W. Nachtigall, F. Wedekind, A. DREHER, Hinweise auf Aerodynamische Rauhigkeitseffekte an Vogel-Flogelprofilen, In Biona Report 3, Bird Flight – Vogelflug (ed. W. Nachtigall). (1985) 195-218.

[13] W. Nachtigall, B. Kempf, Comparative studies on the function of the bastard wing (alula spuria) in the flight biology of birds, Journal of Comparative Physiology. 71 (1971) 326-341.

DOI: 10.1007/bf00298144

[14] J. Meseguer, S. Franchini, I. Perez-Grande, J.L. Sanz, On the aerodynamics of leading-edge high-lift devices of avian wings, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part G, Journal of aerospace engineering. 219 (2005) 63-68.

DOI: 10.1243/095441005x9067

[15] T.S. Liu, K. Kuykendoll, R. Rhew, S. Jones, Avian wing geometry and kinematics, AIAA Paper. 44 (2006) 954-963.

DOI: 10.2514/1.16224

[16] S. Klan, T. Bachmann, M. Klaas, H. Wagner, W. Schroder, Experimental analysis of the flow field over a novel owl based airfoil, Experiments in Fluids. 46 (2009) 975-989.

DOI: 10.1007/s00348-008-0600-7

[17] Biesel W, Butz H, Nachtigall W, Erste Messungen der Flugelgeometrie bei frei gleitfliegenden Haustauben (columbia livia var. domestica) unter Benutzung neu ausgearbeiteter Verfahren der Windkanaltechnik und der Stereophotogrammetrie. Biona-report 3 (1985).

[18] A.M.O. Smith, High-Lift Aerodynamics, Journal of aircraft (37th Wright Brothers Lecture). 12 (1975) 501-530.