Hybrid Biological Fiber-Reinforced Resin-Based Friction Materials Friction and Wear Performance Test

Article Preview

Abstract:

Friction material is essential for automotive braking system. Based on previous study of existing friction material problems, hybrid biological fiber-reinforced resin-based friction materials (HBRMs, from the reinforced fiber component of resin-based friction materials) were explored in this study. Bamboo fiber, jute fiber and wool fiber (all have length of 3-5 mm) were processed to make three types of HBRMs and considered as three factors of biological reinforced fiber in test using orthogonal experimental design. Each factor had three levels of 1%, 2% and 3% fiber mass fraction while the ratio of other raw materials remains unchanged. According to the orthogonal experimental design table, nine formulations (denoted as M1-M9) were determined to test the HBRMs. For comparison, non-bio-fiber reinforced friction material (NBM) was added in the test. The properties of the HBRMs tested included Rockwell hardness, impact strength and density. The friction and wear performance of the braking materials was examined by a speed friction tester. The results show that the friction coefficient of the HBRMs was slightly higher than that of the NBM, indicating biological fibers affected the friction coefficient. The friction coefficient of the HBRMs decreased firstly with the increase of temperature and had the lowest value when the temperature reached 300°C, and it increased then as temperature increased. During recovery process, the friction coefficient of the HBRMs firstly increased with the decrease of temperature and then decreased greatly when the temperature dropped to 100°C. The wear rates of the HBRMs increased with the increase of temperature and reached maximum value when temperature reached 200°C, then it decreased with the increase of temperature. The results of fuzzy comprehensive evaluation analysis on the friction coefficient and wear rate show that the best comprehensive properties were presented when the mass fraction of bamboo, jute and wool fiber were 3%, 3% and 1%,respectively.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

388-396

Citation:

Online since:

November 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] L. Han, L. Huang, J.S. Zhang, Y.F. Lu. Optimization of ceramic friction materials. Composites Science and Technology. 2006, 66(15): 2895–2906.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2006.02.027

Google Scholar

[2] L. Gudmand-Høyer, A. Bach, G. T. Nielsen, Per Morgen. Tribological properties of automotive disc brakes with solid lubricants. Wear. 1999, 232(2): 168–175.

DOI: 10.1016/s0043-1648(99)00142-8

Google Scholar

[3] B. Öztürk, F. Arslan, S. Öztürk. Hot wear properties of ceramic and basalt fiber reinforced hybrid friction materials. Tribology International. 2007, 40(1): 37–48.

DOI: 10.1016/j.triboint.2006.01.027

Google Scholar

[4] U.S. Hong S.L. Jung, K.H. Cho, M.H. Cho, S.J. Kim, H. Jang. Wear mechanism of multiphase friction materials with different phenolic resin matrices. Wear. 2009, 266(7-8): 739–744.

DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2008.08.008

Google Scholar

[5] G. Cueva, A. Sinatora, W. L. Guesser, A.P. Tschiptschin. Wear resistance of cast irons used in brake disc rotors. Wear. 2003, 255(7-12): 1256–1260.

DOI: 10.1016/s0043-1648(03)00146-7

Google Scholar

[6] J. Hardell, E. Kassfeldt, B. Prakash. Friction and wear behaviour of high strength boron steel at elevated temperatures of up to 800℃. Wear. 2008, 264(24-26): 788–799.

DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2006.12.077

Google Scholar

[7] B. Christopher. Modern carbon composite brake materials. Journal of Composite Materials. 2004, 38(21): 1837–1850.

DOI: 10.1177/0021998304048412

Google Scholar

[8] Q.F. Guan, G.Y. Li; H.Y. Wang. An J. Friction-wear characteristics of carbon fiber reinforced friction material. Journal of Materials Science. 2004, 39(2): 641–643.

DOI: 10.1023/b:jmsc.0000011520.48580.fc

Google Scholar

[9] A. Rahim AbuBakar, H. J. Ouyang. Wear prediction of friction material and brake squeal using the finite element method. Wear. 2008, 264(11-12): 1069–1076.

DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2007.08.015

Google Scholar

[10] G. Nicholson 100 Years of Brake Linings & Clutch Facings–Facts about Friction. P&W Price Enterprises, Inc., (1995).

Google Scholar

[11] N. Chand, SAR. Hashmi, S. Lomash, A. Naik. Development of asbestos free brake pad. Mechanical Engineering Division. 2004, 85(1): 13–16.

Google Scholar

[12] S. Yoshiyuki. Granules of raw material for friction material and method of manufacturing the same. United States Patent. 6265356. (2001).

Google Scholar

[13] S. J. R. Simons, X. Pepin. Hardness of moist agglomerates in relation to interparticle friction, capillary and viscous forces. Powder Technology. 2003, 128(1): 57–62.

DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2003.08.041

Google Scholar

[14] X. Pepin, S. J. R. Simons, S. Blanchon, D. Rossetti, G. Couarraze. Hardness of moist agglomerates in relation to interparticle friction, granule liquid content and nature. Powder Technology. 2001, 11(1-2): 123–138.

DOI: 10.1016/s0032-5910(01)00324-2

Google Scholar

[15] E. Rondet, M. Delalonde, T. Ruiz, J.P. Desfours. Identification of granular compactness during the kneading of a humidified cohesive powder. Powder Technology. 2009, 191: (1) 7–12.

DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2008.09.004

Google Scholar

[16] A. Wirth, D. Eggleston, R. Whitaker. Fundamental tribochemical study of the third body layer formed during automotive friction braking. Wear. 179: (1994) 75–81.

DOI: 10.1016/0043-1648(94)90222-4

Google Scholar

[17] W. Osterle, M. Griepentrog, T. Gross, I. Urban. Chemical and micro structural changes induced by friction and wear of brakes. Wear. 250/251: (2001) 1469–1476.

DOI: 10.1016/s0043-1648(01)00785-2

Google Scholar

[18] M. Eriksson, S. Jacobson. Tribological surfaces of organic brake pads. Tribology International. 33: (2000) 817–827.

DOI: 10.1016/s0301-679x(00)00127-4

Google Scholar